Mere paas court ke liye arguments hai!

the redbox contents - i agree. raj could have questioned salve from where did it come? and when raj is accused of killing shakti for the redbox - uss waqt redbox was with neither of them. how did it contents reach the court? this is a blooper of course.
the cadets of course - the can tell abt the mobile cross connection - but do they have any proof - the voices were not even recorded and of course salve will blame them for lying to save capt. raj.
as far as abhi is concerned - the man is not a fool. naina mite think that due to sunlight abhi's vision was dimmed but that pt came to abhi's mind also so he cleared it. vaise bhi cadets jo bhi prove karna chahtein hain - nothing would have worked out - we have more intelligent senior officers sitting on top of their heads.

No, koi proofs nahin the........par yeh fon cross connections deta hai, yeh to proov ho sakta tha na..........

Kam se kam, benefit of doubt mil jata

nahin hota yaar - everything in a court is based on proofs. phone ke cross connection ke baare mein only cadets ko pata hain aur kisiko nahin - agar faculty unke saath hoti toh aat banti. even raj did not believe when pooja mentioned it remember. how do u expect the jury to believe? as usual they would have asked the filmy dialogue - kya tumhare paas koi saboot hain? the cadets knew that and that's why they did not mention it. it would not be enough to prove raj innocent. shakti died and even if abhi had not witnessed this raj would have been blamed because he was the last person to see shakti before he died and naturally he would have to give an explanation. vaise bhi gehlot would see to it that the axe falls on raj.

Originally posted by: jivora

Kam se kam, benefit of doubt mil jata

benefit of doubt tab diya jaata hai - if the victim has proofs to prove his point. here the victim is raj. the cadets were the ones who heard the mobile talk. they cannot be given benefit of doubt - however they can testify for raj in the witness stand provided they have the necessary proof. this is the legal rule i think so.

Originally posted by: anujkpjk

nahin hota yaar - everything in a court is based on proofs. phone ke cross connection ke baare mein only cadets ko pata hain aur kisiko nahin - agar faculty unke saath hoti toh aat banti. even raj did not believe when pooja mentioned it remember. how do u expect the jury to believe? as usual they would have asked the filmy dialogue - kya tumhare paas koi saboot hain? the cadets knew that and that's why they did not mention it. it would not be enough to prove raj innocent. shakti died and even if abhi had not witnessed this raj would have been blamed because he was the last person to see shakti before he died and naturally he would have to give an explanation. vaise bhi gehlot would see to it that the axe falls on raj.

I agree with you.

The telephone cross connections were shown so that cadets have their belief on Rajveer.

exactly jis red box ke liye rajveer itne time se apne mission par hai achanak uske contents salve ke pass...!!!! aur court ko ye janane mein koi interest nahi tha ki ye uske paas aaya kahan se....!!aur raj ka mission to poora ho gaya..ab to ye proov ho chuka hai ki naveen was innocent and was not traitor..lekin ab ye kaun proov karega ki raj is innocent...aur wo lala aur nair jo ki asli traitor hain kya sabke samne aa payenge.....aur mujhe samajh nahi aata ki jisko marna hota hai wo khud kyun nahi marta raj ko hi kyun bolta hai...dono ne ye nahi socha ki unke marne ke baad raj ka kya hoga....the result is courtmarshal n the prision...!! poor raj... 😭

what all you guy are saying is true but have you ever heard of a case which finishes in just one day and this is a murder case even if you have 100s of eye witnesses murder cases go on for years cos there dealing with someones livelihood i know this is a serial but come on some consideration should have been given to these facts