Sanjay Dutt gets 6 years in Jail. Fair? - Page 3

OMG ! I forgot whatever I had to type seeing the above AV and signature😛

Originally posted by: Pradarshak

If he was acquitted of terrorism charges, IMO this term is too harsh on him. I am not against any punishment just because he was well-behaved all these years.He had already been in jail for 16 months. 6 years sound way too long, it could have been 2 yrs or so for the crime he committed.

WELCOME BACK PRADARSHAK !!!!😊

Nice thoughts!!! But Crime is a crime ! No one is so innocent that they keep or allow any one to keep anything in their home.Why should there be a concession/rebate in the punishment if he is a celebrity? In India there are somany other cases in which the punishment is given after somany years,who knows they too might be reformed by that time! If there is no concession for those people,why some rebate for Sanju Baba!!!

Sanjay Dutt ..is not making any charity by acting in films.He is acting for his sake and for his money! Bollywood is worried because there are 100 crore worth films to be done by him in the next few months ,so they are worried about their projects!!!

However if he is a naadan Bhai then he will be given right judgement by apex court!!

Wishes,

Mythili

Originally posted by: mythili_Kiran

OMG ! I forgot whatever I had to type seeing the above AV and signature😛

Do you mean my Avi and Sig?? I don't understand ...sorry... 😳

i think whn people like salaman khan who killed so many people r roaming around and abu salem is standing for elections? then r poor souls like sanjay who had been threathened to keep th weapons being punished so harshly?i mean a sentence of a 2 or 3 yrs would have been enough bcoz he is not a hard core criminal. and his threthenings sld have been kept in mind while punishing him.
over all i think 6 yrs is way too much. and i just hope he is absolved by the SC.

A. A person who distribute's weapons(and is caught in possesion of mass killing weapons) during a highly volatile communal situation
B. A person who is drunk and goes and kills people
C. A serial Rapist
D. A murderer

In my book I as a citizen will be happy if all 4 are put to death, but to me the crime of A is the worst, Others you can explain they have a mental deficieny and they are sick minded people. I for no reason can understand person in A.I think that is the highest crime in this and I think even if you take victims of A,B,C and D, they will pick the crime of A to be the highest

There is no justification that since B, C and D are roaming around A, should be set free too 😆

Originally posted by: sareg

A. A person who distribute's weapons(and is caught in possesion of mass killing weapons) during a highly volatile communal situation
B. A person who is drunk and goes and kills people
C. A serial Rapist
D. A murderer

In my book I as a citizen will be happy if all 4 are put to death, but to me the crime of A is the worst, Others you can explain they have a mental deficieny and they are sick minded people. I for no reason can understand person in A.I think that is the highest crime in this and I think even if you take victims of A,B,C and D, they will pick the crime of A to be the highest

There is no justification that since B, C and D are roaming around A, should be set free too 😆

You make a good point, that just b/c another criminal is roaming free does not mean that others should be allowed to do the same... any crime that hurts someone is just as bad as any other, and any person capable of hurting someone has issues. We can't pardon some crimes saying they were committed because the criminal was not in their senses. however, when a crime is commited it is up to the law to reform the person who committed to make sure they do not do the same again. One life is lost, should we as a society committ another crime by taking another life? I am simply saying Jail is not the solution to every crime!... There are more better and productive ways a criminal can be punished, reformed and pay for his crime while working for the betterment of society. And isn't that the goal of the justice system in the end that society functions well. Let me give an example. Salman khan hunting case (note: NOT his drunk driving case). Sending Salman khan to jail, where he will sit and repent. Is that the best punishment? He is already repenting and probably cursing himself for ever doing that... so why not now use his popularity to our advantage. Why not get him to go around spread the message of how bad hunting is... why not get him to serve in a National park taking care of the endangered animals? Jail is meant for those who are a threat to society, who if left in the open with other people, will harm them, hence they should be kept away. If a crime is committed one has to pay for it, but sitting in Jail is not always the best method in my opinion, when other ways could benefit society as a whole and maybe make a better place to live in... 😊

Originally posted by: sareg

A. A person who distribute's weapons(and is caught in possesion of mass killing weapons) during a highly volatile communal situation
B. A person who is drunk and goes and kills people
C. A serial Rapist
D. A murderer

In my book I as a citizen will be happy if all 4 are put to death, but to me the crime of A is the worst, Others you can explain they have a mental deficieny and they are sick minded people. I for no reason can understand person in A.I think that is the highest crime in this and I think even if you take victims of A,B,C and D, they will pick the crime of A to be the highest

There is no justification that since B, C and D are roaming around A, should be set free too 😆

its not like who r roaming around free its bcoz y they r roaming around free? bcoz the ones who have the backing of underworld roam around free and those who dont they suffer inspite of being threathened to kill their family or anything. and nt saying they sld not punish him but 6 yrs is way too much.

Law sld be to kill the crime not the criminal. the ones who r real criminals r roaming around freely. inspite of paying attention to them. a peoson who does not have underworld backing is harrased this way and the official get all the underserving praise.

a mistake and a crime r two diff things. something which is done intentionally is a crime but something which u r made to do at the point of a gun is a diff thing and therefore sanjay dutt needs to be set free of a jail of less duration.

sanhay dutt is not a person of criminal disposition so he is not likely to commit any crime in future. so people who r real criminal sld be caught (which our police is not able to do or not willing to whtever) and punished severely.

Originally posted by: sandya_rao7

its not like who r roaming around free its bcoz y they r roaming around free? bcoz the ones who have the backing of underworld roam around free and those who dont they suffer inspite of being threathened to kill their family or anything. and nt saying they sld not punish him but 6 yrs is way too much.

Law sld be to kill the crime not the criminal. the ones who r real criminals r roaming around freely. inspite of paying attention to them. a peoson who does not have underworld backing is harrased this way and the official get all the underserving praise.

a mistake and a crime r two diff things. something which is done intentionally is a crime but something which u r made to do at the point of a gun is a diff thing and therefore sanjay dutt needs to be set free of a jail of less duration.

sanhay dutt is not a person of criminal disposition so he is not likely to commit any crime in future. so people who r real criminal sld be caught (which our police is not able to do or not willing to whtever) and punished severely.

I agree with you 👏👏👏

I was one of very few on this forum who always wanted Sanjay Dutt and Salman Khan behind bars but 6 years seem too long for just carrying weapons. He already served some time in prison and also the harassment and uncertainty he had to live through all these years.

Originally posted by: Modesty

They say justice has prevailed but today as an ordinary Indian citizen I feel very dejected and frustrated.

How come Sanjay Dutt who's not called even a fly with that illegally acquired Ak47 get 6 years of RI and Yasin Malik JKLF chief who'd killed many innocent Kashmiri Pandits spent only 4 years in Indian prisons? Why is he roaming freely in my country and making a mockery of our Constitution?

Doesn't it reek of Judiciary's double standards? I strongly believe that Sanjay Dutt has been denied justice. For me tis a very sad day today.

TC.

Beats me. 😕

Originally posted by: Saregama_fan

I agree with you 👏👏👏

thanks