i think shaurya is shakshi n rehman son - Page 2

Firstly, since the story is about anti- Goenkas, Shaurya has to remain Goenka all the while. The whole theme of rich vs poor will otherwise fall apart. He was portrayed as a 'Rayeeszada' and all these comes from the Goenka surname.

Secondly, practically pregnancy cannot be forged like this. It is just not possible. Besides, Rajnath was in Kolkata and Rehmat was in Lucknow. How did she meet Mr. Goenka to trap him ? Lucknow to Kolkata needs to be explained first. If Raj was in Lucknow then there is a possibilit that she was already pregnant with Raj's child while she was legally married to Rehmat Khan. Thus, murdering her husband was necessary.

SHe also paid a huge amount. How did a small journalist get that much money unless someone paid for it ? Who was that someone ? Raj ?



Thirdly, Raj is not Dev Goenka. He cannot be fooled like this. If a woman is at least 1 mon pregnant prior to her marriage, the child will be delivered within 8 months of the marriage. A man like Raj will take that easily sounds stupid to me. Alternatively, if Raj already knows Shaurya is not his son there is not reason why he should cry when Shaurya attempted suicide.

Fourthly, neither Rehmat nor Rajnath is her true love. WHo was her true love ? Knowing Sakshi, she will do anything and everything to keep herself safe. I cannot believe she was careless enough to get pregnant out of a marriage that didn't mean anything to her. Even if she was she would have simply aborted the child. We all know how ruthless she is.

Besides, we know she was ambitious. Marriage, relationships nothing mattered to her more than herself.

About Kangana, I am terribly confused. She is younger to all here. Had she been the eldest of both Dev and Shaurya we could have assumed that she was Raj's daughter from his first marriage. She has no sign of being Sakshi's daughter and nobody cares for her too.

@dey leave the 8 month part. Of course it can be passed of as premature delivery by bribing the doc or nurse.

this can be possible but the changes are pretty less

coz raj loves him a lot more than sakshi

so he might be his own blood

sruthiravi,

I do not think so. Rajnath is also insanely attached to Shaurya. And honestly Sakshi couldn't have fooled him to the extent of believing a pregnancy. Plus Rehmat was a good guy. Whereas Shaurya sucks. He has worst traits of both Sakshi and Rajnath. The way Sakshi taunted Rajnath how Shaurya tried to kill Dev same way as he did to Arnab, shows they are alike.

leave the 8 month part. Of course it can be passed of as premature delivery by bribing the doc or nurse.

Shruti a premature delivery shows on its own. The premature babies need extra care. Any normal baby cannot be shown as a premature delivery if you want a logical story. Besides, the mother must be on the hospital bed to bribe anyone at that time.

If she does she has to do it before the delivery but then how was she married to Mr. Goenka in Kolkata after murdering Rehmat in Lucknow ? Rather there is a possibility that she was already pregnant with Rajnath's child while still married to Rehmat. But again, how did Akram or his uncle didn't know what made Sakshi Mrs. Goenka ?

Then there are ample of other ways to know if he is your son or not for a man like Rajnath. Its easy to fool anyone like Dev or Rehmt but its always difficult to fool anyone like Rajnath.

Originally posted by: pjm123

i feel kangana is not rajnath daughter.because sakshi looks not attached to her.May be due to her fault she is not feeling attached.In revenge also victoria loves his son but with daughter she is not attached because victoria feels that she deceived charllote father. Somehow i has feeling sakshi had affair with mathur after marriage with rajnath.That's why mathur sometimes called him sakshi. regarding marriage with rajnath,i think she fakes pregancy.That's why rajnath once said u do acting very well,who knows better than me.Then sakshi said then u did marry to me due to that acting. And in one interview simone told that she knows about kangana and karan affair.I think she wants to let go it for his son sake.Why she is not attached to her daughter this much.That's why i am more fishy about sakshi and kangana relationship.

i think shaurya is rehman son.

Originally posted by: shruthiravi

But let me look at this scenario. If Dev is gonna fight alongside Durga an accusation can come on him that , he went against his family because he wants to own the Goenka empire. I mean if Shaurya is eliminated Dev is the only heir for the Goenka empire.

If Dev needs to redeemed of such an accusation the logical conclusion has to be Shaurya is not a Goenka. Shaurya has more animal instinct similar to Sakshi. Rajnath though cunning has a class of his own and is more subtle suitable for high class society, whereas Shaurya has street manners. He prides too much on that Goenka tag. Remember " I am Shaurya Goenka". The biggest punishment for him is the knowledge that he is not a Goenka and that tag is his mother's charity for him.

agree with u. Shaurya is defying everyone. He doesnt have any manners. I will be happy if shaurya is not a goenka but how is it possible raj is very affectinate towards him.

i think kangana is not their blood..
They are not taking care of her..
Which father will use own daughter as a prey, play with her feelings, to achieve his target??
Sad to see rajnath using her, to plot againsy Dev