Increasing the permissible duration of pregnancy for MTP-good or bad? - Page 6

Created

Last reply

Replies

52

Views

3.5k

Users

6

Likes

55

Frequent Posters

return_to_hades thumbnail
20th Anniversary Thumbnail Stunner Thumbnail + 6
Posted: 11 years ago
#51
The Medically Terminated Pregnancy Act was not created to prevent female foeticide. It is India's version of Roe v. Wade. Under the British law abortion was illegal. The MTP act of 1971 made abortion legal and medically accessible.

The MTP acts role is to outline and define abortion rights and limitations in India. A pregnancy under 12 weeks can be aborted without any concern. 12-20 weeks is late term abortion and requires opinions of two medical professionals. The extension from 20-24 weeks or more is a purely medical question related to the health of mother and infant. If the life of the mother is at risk or the fetus is diagnosed with terminal or life debilitating illness, I see no reason to not extend the time frame. Remember the intent of this law is the rights and choices of the mother.

It is extremely crucial that we separate abortion from female foeticide.

The PCPNDT act is the one that is designed to prevent female foeticides. This act declares gender screening and testing of infants to be illegal. Any preconception and prenatal diagnostics and testing is to be done only for health reasons not to identify gender. This law strictly defines the scope of PCPNDT practices. It stipulates what is illegal and outlines penalties for those breaches.

The government has done its role in preventing female foeticide by making it illegal to obtain the gender of the child. It forces abortion decisions to be independent of gender. It is also trying its best to educate people.

The government has actually fulfilled their role to the best of their capacity. It is now up to society to follow these laws, report illegal activity and change their attitudes in general.

Again though, I cannot reiterate how extremely extremely crucial it is to support abortion rights and separate it from female foeticide. There are many religious and conservative entities trying to attack a woman's right to choose. There are many religious and conservative entities trying to deny women the right to have abortion under any circumstance. By tying abortion and female foeticide we are actually ironically empowering those who engage in an attack on women.
Angel-likeDevil thumbnail
16th Anniversary Thumbnail Trailblazer Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 11 years ago
#52
OK...I got it!
But wait... i just referred to Wikipedia , see what it says about MTP and it's intention to reduce the extent gendericide - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Medical_Termination_of_Pregnancy_Act_(1971)#Legal_status
It even speaks about maternal mortality and mobidity :s ...abortions do lead to weakening of reproductive health.
I think it is the synergized effect of MTP and PCPNDT that guards against female foeticide.
Question is, why is there a legislation when abortion should be prerogative of the woman(in situations where she doesnt know sex of the foetus).
RTH, in your last para, are you saying that women should have COMPLETE say on what she is to do with the foetus? But where did this question come from? It is the woman's prerogative... sure, and yes, there are so many cases where woman is attacked, tortured, divorced for producing a female child... but why do you say this here, link it with abortion and female foeticide? How will it cut down attack on woman... i sort of dont get the clarity.
return_to_hades thumbnail
20th Anniversary Thumbnail Stunner Thumbnail + 6
Posted: 11 years ago
#53

Originally posted by: Angel-likeDevil

But wait... i just referred to Wikipedia , see what it says about MTP and it's intention to reduce the extent gendericide - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Medical_Termination_of_Pregnancy_Act_(1971)#Legal_status



Can you cite where specifically it says MTP is intended to reduce gendercide? I don't see it anywhere.

Originally posted by: Angel-likeDevil

It even speaks about maternal mortality and mobidity :s ...abortions do lead to weakening of reproductive health.



The quote is as follows

"The Indian abortion laws falls under the Medical Termination of Pregnancy (MTP) Act, which was enacted by the Indian Parliament in the year 1971 with the intention of reducing the incidence of illegal abortion and consequent maternal mortality and morbidity."

It DOES NOT state abortion leads to weakening of reproductive health.

It DOES state Illegal abortions cause maternal mortality and morbidity.

It DOES state MTP reduced illegal abortions by offering safe abortion alternative.

Illegal abortion here means using the coat hanger method or illicit doctors and midwifes who conducted abortions without the regulation on safety and methodology.


Originally posted by: Angel-likeDevil

I think it is the synergized effect of MTP and PCPNDT that guards against female foeticide.



No MTP has absolutely nothing to do female foeticide.

Question is, why is there a legislation when abortion should be prerogative of the woman(in situations where she doesnt know sex of the foetus).



Because many people want to view fetus as life. They want to give fetus a right to life. They want to deny abortions.

Abortion laws balance pro life and pro choice views. That is where the 12 week rule in MTP comes in. Prior to 12 weeks a woman can have abortion without any restrictions. Between 12 to 20 weeks it gives fetus somewhat of a life status allowing abortion in medically demanding cases. Beyond 20 weeks it gives fetus full life protection.

Abortion laws also regulate safety and standards so women are not reproductively damaged by poor methods or doctors.

RTH, in your last para, are you saying that women should have COMPLETE say on what she is to do with the foetus? But where did this question come from? It is the woman's prerogative... sure, and yes, there are so many cases where woman is attacked, tortured, divorced for producing a female child... but why do you say this here, link it with abortion and female foeticide? How will it cut down attack on woman... i sort of dont get the clarity.




I am not talking about women being attacked for producing a female child.

This is in broader context of abortion in general. People want to deny women the choice because they want to define fetus as life.

Linking female foeticide and abortion lets conservatives to say - hey ban abortion, that will resolve the problem of female foeticide too. That is why separating the issues is important.

Edited by return_to_hades - 11 years ago

Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".