Agreed most painters who paint women do like to project them closer to their natural self i e painting them nude/ seminude.I guess it is their way of paying homage to woman's beauty.
But they always tell the models who are posing for them that they are going to paint them in a certain way before hand itself.Even the paintings from those olden times were done with the woman's consent.
Here Palash has asked Anandi to pose for him because he wanted to show case the beauty and the strength of Indian woman .He never told her taht he wanted to paint her semi nude when she gave her consent in the begining.
He had no business asking her to pose semi nude or whether he can paint her semi nude AFTER she has given consent to paint her.
So Anandi was right in getting angry with him because as far as she is concerned it is not part of her contract.It does amount to breach of contract.Even though no monetary exchange happened it was still a breach of trust.
Though he pacified her saying that he brought it up to get some reaction from her it still was not right on his part.
I think after consulting his Venus he made some changes to the portrait. Which may not be appreciated
Well Anandi became Kali and Haughty queen and Shiv opened his third eye.😃
May be this will run like Rasika's case except here Anandi has got a true case and Shiv is no Narendra nor the painter is Shiv😆