Originally posted by: ambolove
Hi laila, but what you have said is also based on what you think, and not fact. Same as what I said was based on my opinion and my thinking and not actually based on fact.
If you see pari's side as fact, then actually not all of it is.
Nonsense. And it is NOT because a Pari fan.
About not being partial, I was talking about how ankita made the decision to stop Pari and narens allowance based on what Pari was taking without accounting for it, despite being family.
It's a tough call to make. To stop your own families allowance. Yet she did it.
Probably she was doing it for other reasons, but we all have our own assumptions and thoughts and what she did and why she did it.And the decision was based on? I do not recollect this - mind showing us the scene? Granted i am three weeks behind on the show. Still this does not make Anitka qualified to run it. How about Teju? She's had even more years of experience.I am talking about the show at the time the decision was made. it was a wrong decision and based on NOTHING but the need to boost Anitka's self esteem nothing to do with her qualifications. the theft - if it exists - is an afterthought and was NOT the reason why Pari did not become MD. I suggest you think logically rather than emotionally.
Anyway isn't that bad business in itself on pari's part? Not accounting properly? Yes there's a possibility that Pari WAS accounting properly but how was she going to give it all back? In fact was she intending to? Did she see herself in debt? Or did she take full responsibility and thought to herself that she will put that money back into business? I'm sorry but whatever she was doing was VERY bad business practice especially since the company didn't belong to her in the first place! I personally wouldn't want to work with a company like that where employees are allowed to take whatever they want even if they are not entitled to it. Isn't it the mark of a great business person, budgeting? I assumed that would be the first thing a business person would be doing.
Yet in recent years I don't see Pari doing any sort of budgeting. And I'm not claiming that as fact, it's based on what I personally am seeing on the show.
Pari used to be good with money when she was rich, now she's poor all she seems to do is spend and budget very poorly because according to her she's used to that lifestyle.Once again; if she was not doing a good job with the company, her grandfather would have said it in the scene.
So why is she relying on naren? When she can start her own businesses? Instead of stealing money to make her life comfortable? When she's so clever herself and she's got the brains and business mind to start her own businesses, why didn't she do it? Why was she a) relying on her husband to take them out of the rut and b) relying on her grandfather to give his business to her?
Isn't that a major flaw in her decision?
She's great with business so why not just do it? Make your own! Rather than relying on someone else.but why should she? she has run her grandfather's company for years. why should she give it up because you are an Anitka fan?
Again based on fact according to what I saw on the show which WAS backed up by evidence showing Pari to be relying on others rather than using her own business mind.sorry i disagree.
That's not how a good business woman thinks at all. If every business person thought that then obviously they would be stuck in debt like Pari is.
It would have been great to show Pari as a proper business minded girl who single handedly took her family out of debt. But she didn't do that. Rather blaming everyone else for her predicament, also based on fact, seen on the show.
So apart from that how do we know that ankita was just sitting in ranvijay's house for five years and wasn't self employed? Or wasn't in higher education? Obviously also not based as fact. We can't just assume that ankita WASN'T doing something and Pari WAS doing something because we DIDN'T see what happened during those five years so we can't assume? Right? And it could be that she WAS just sitting, doing nothing, I'm not refuting that.What do you mean we should assume she was doing something else? It was right there on the show she did not. I think you are reading into things in the show and creating your own drama in your own imaginary world.
Anyway we have seen on the show that ankita is apparently a good MD. Based on my thinking, of what I saw, obviously others will see it in a different light but my thinking is that she was a good employer.
Fact is Pari WAS stealing from the company, and yes this IS a fact as stated on the show. If a business is to survive then everything needs to be accounted for financially. I did not say emotions are the only part of a business.
But if she's stealing, then she'll steal more and this will lead to debt and THAT is based on thinking and above all EMOTIONS. So you see? Emotions come into play everywhere.
Right now based on fact, on what we are seeing on the show, Pari is letting emotions rule her life. And that's a fact, because otherwise how can you try to get rid of five year old kid just to eliminate your rival?
She tried to get ankita killed for a reason, just to get EVERYTHING back, including her grandfathers business. Again, bad business, killing someone just to own something.Again, i have not seen this but you have.
And dear I did not say anything against what you were saying about kinnari, I was AGREEING with you.
Anyway you support Pari and I support ankita, so let's just leave it at that.
I'm here to enjoy the show, what's left of it and don't really want to pick apart all the individual characters.
I like all the individual actors and actresses and think every show needs it's villain and Pari is a good multi dimensional character who I have a soft spot for but who I still love to hate.you like the way the show is? OK.
Fact is in recent years Pari has changed a lot from what she used to be. She was a caring friend, a loyal lover, a doting daughter, a perfect granddaughter, an unparalleled business woman. But she is none of these now, so how can you expect her to do right by her business?
She may have been perfect then, it may be fact that she DID right by her business and employers THEN. But can she really do that NOW as a completely different person who has completely different ideals, someone who feels no qualms in stealing from someone else's business, from trying to murder someone else to getting someone kidnapped?
I don't think her business acumen would be good at all now if everything else is so scewed.
She'd be making wrong decisions now.
Like I said the Pari from the past was different to the Pari from now. Pari from the past would have accounted for every penny which is why she was so successful. She was making good decisions compared to the Pari of NOW.
If she can steal as an employee then how will she make a good employer? In fact how would she make a good business woman? Making bad decisions in business will always come back to bite you on the bum.
Obviously all this is based on what I think as a person and obviously not set in stone as fact.
Happy reading.Actually I think you write too much and I gave up reading it. Ever heard Keeping it to the point? You said the same things 50 times. that's too much. If you respond again with an essay, i won't read or respond to it.
😆 😳