Posted:
I do not understand Jodha in Maham's episode
Jodha saw in her own eyes Maham's son Adham tried to kill her husband a Shahenshah a month before
Jodha knows Maham killed Jalal and Ruqus kid with a ark because of which Ruku cannot become mother and hence Jo has to give her baby to Ruq
Jodha knows Maham tried to create misunderstanding that Sujamal is her lover in Akbar's mind
YET she goes and tries to feed her OKKK fineee with me she is a great human feeling sympathy
But what is this today she says take back shrap curse
Dear Jo are you doing Maham seva because she is another human being like you OR to make her take back curse?
And how will Akbar the father feel once he knows your intention?
He is really angry at Maham because she curse his babies YETTT he never went and told her take back your curse badi ammi blah blah Why? Have you ever thought of that
Is Maham curse so much importance?
Do curse apply on innocent kids? Never
Is this not promoting stupid superstition that an evil dai ma curse gets a empire's powerful emperor and his queen so jittery
Jodha do you believe in God or an evil woman curse?
Akbar seems to be believing God while you are scared of an evil woman and her curse
Any rational thinking human will feel that curse cannot have an impact on babies.
Your husband Akbar only says father's crime kids should not be punished
Do you not believe in that?
OK Akbar killed Adham a bit cruelly than was required so will God punish babies for that never God is great and consider all humans as his kids. Especially God loves kids and will never ever hurt them. Where is your faith in God?
And why do you forget all actions of human is written by God only man only impements. God wrote Adham's cruel death because his crimes were so much. Akbar only impelemented what God had wanted.
Stop going to Maham and begging her to remove curse and she curse Akbar and babies more pls stop doing this. This is promoting superstition openly.
Seconly in real history Maham tried to kill Akbar twice and killed his few babies. Why is she being shown as some tragedy heroine here? Akbar is looking like a villan a esaan faramosh son here. Why CVs? Are you not tired already spoiling many Akbar's family reputation by showing them as villan be it Bakshi, Nigar, Hamida, Ruqu and Akbar himself many times before. Now why show him as a ungrateful son while in reality he treated a daima with more respect than own mother even though he is an emperor. Which man in real history has treated daima with so much respect and love ever? Which man has forgiven his daima and her children for repeated murder attempts on him? Yet you are making Gulbadan say maham saved his life many times. She saved him on that Kabul fort when Akbar and she was bombarded by humayun forces. So many soldiers have given their life to save Akbar in so many wars does that have no value? Only once maham saved him and she becomes greater than some angel?
I somehow do not like this kind of portrayal of a pure villan.
At that rate we can say hitler was a saviour to Aryans and germans etc every villan is a hero of someone else that does not make them real heroes.
Anupamaa
Tu Juliet Jatt Di
Naagin 7
377