Dangerous foreshadowing

YHM seems to be on a mission to create scenes just to lead us to big reveals!
1. For the past God knows how many months Ishita has been deposited in the kitchen make the Bhallas dinner. I even remember her actually making palak paneer for Raman! And Ms. Ruhi .. I remember her bragging to Shravan that while he eats iddli everyday Ishita makes something new for her all the time. Now all of a sudden she is giving Ruhi iddli everyday? And remember when Buaji came and Ishita made all that veg punjabi stuff? What happened to all that ??? lastly Ishita and her Amma talking about how her Mother IN Law doesn't teach her punjabi cooking? Bottom line all this stupidity and inconsistency is only to introduce Poornima who is ...,, drumroll. Raman's Mother and Ishus real saas!!!

2.Scene 2 for effect: the whole bachelor party was for one sole purpose : for Raman to throw out his card and us to see the sudden addition of Omprakash to his name!!! All this time he has been RKB all off a sudden naya naam karaan lol no pun intended. This just to connect the Prakash to Poornima.

3. Worried about this one ... When Romi brought up the bachelor party Raman said we aren't divorced yet. Hence one if the two of them r getting a divorce ( him or Mihir). Someone had put it out there earlier can someone ask Sonali the writer???

Originally posted by: Tunaraj

YHM seems to be on a mission to create scenes just to lead us to big reveals!
1. For the past God knows how many months Ishita has been deposited in the kitchen make the Bhallas dinner. I even remember her actually making palak paneer for Raman! And Ms. Ruhi .. I remember her bragging to Shravan that while he eats iddli everyday Ishita makes something new for her all the time. Now all of a sudden she is giving Ruhi iddli everyday? And remember when Buaji came and Ishita made all that veg punjabi stuff? What happened to all that ??? lastly Ishita and her Amma talking about how her Mother IN Law doesn't teach her punjabi cooking? Bottom line all this stupidity and inconsistency is only to introduce Poornima who is ...,, drumroll. Raman's Mother and Ishus real saas!!!

2.Scene 2 for effect: the whole bachelor party was for one sole purpose : for Raman to throw out his card and us to see the sudden addition of Omprakash to his name!!! All this time he has been RKB all off a sudden naya naam karaan lol no pun intended. This just to connect the Prakash to Poornima.

3. Worried about this one ... When Romi brought up the bachelor party Raman said we aren't divorced yet. Hence one if the two of them r getting a divorce ( him or Mihir). Someone had put it out there earlier can someone ask Sonali the writer???

Originally posted by: Tunaraj

YHM seems to be on a mission to create scenes just to lead us to big reveals!
1. For the past God knows how many months Ishita has been deposited in the kitchen make the Bhallas dinner. I even remember her actually making palak paneer for Raman! And Ms. Ruhi .. I remember her bragging to Shravan that while he eats iddli everyday Ishita makes something new for her all the time. Now all of a sudden she is giving Ruhi iddli everyday? And remember when Buaji came and Ishita made all that veg punjabi stuff? What happened to all that ??? lastly Ishita and her Amma talking about how her Mother IN Law doesn't teach her punjabi cooking? Bottom line all this stupidity and inconsistency is only to introduce Poornima who is ...,, drumroll. Raman's Mother and Ishus real saas!!!

2.Scene 2 for effect: the whole bachelor party was for one sole purpose : for Raman to throw out his card and us to see the sudden addition of Omprakash to his name!!! All this time he has been RKB all off a sudden naya naam karaan lol no pun intended. This just to connect the Prakash to Poornima.

3. Worried about this one ... When Romi brought up the bachelor party Raman said we aren't divorced yet. Hence one if the two of them r getting a divorce ( him or Mihir). Someone had put it out there earlier can someone ask Sonali the writer???

Omprakash is Bhallaji's name...I think the "Prakash" bit is just a way to mislead viewers until Poornima is fully introduced

Redwine1. Lol sweetie I know the name has already been established the point of foreshadowing is to link two points. In this case to link Raman and Poornima. Sorry if it went over your head. :(.

On the divorce u have a point but I hope that doesn't mean it's ISHRA.

On the punjabi food stuff Ishita herself was telling her mom that she doesn't know how to cook punjabi dishes yesterday. And if she thinks she makes great punjabi food y the cookbooks ??

Jus sayin ;)

Originally posted by: redwine1

<font face="Georgia, Times New Roman, Times, serif" size="3" color="#0000ff">
</font>

<font face="Georgia, Times New Roman, Times, serif" size="3" color="#0000ff">Interesting post ...</font>

<font face="Georgia, Times New Roman, Times, serif" size="3" color="#0000ff">
</font>

<font face="Georgia, Times New Roman, Times, serif" size="3" color="#0000ff">Just for the sake of discussion ...</font>

<font face="Georgia, Times New Roman, Times, serif" size="3" color="#0000ff">
</font>

<font face="Georgia, Times New Roman, Times, serif" size="3" color="#0000ff">On point 1: ahem the scene was that Raman told her that she makes awful punjabi food .. he did not say she does not cook punjabi food .. Ishita herself believes that she makes gr8 punjabi food ...</font>

<font face="Georgia, Times New Roman, Times, serif" size="3" color="#0000ff">
</font>

<font face="Georgia, Times New Roman, Times, serif" size="3" color="#0000ff">On point 2: on the addition of OmPrakash Bhalla ... if u noticed the name plates of the building .. u can clearly read form episode 1 .. the name of OmPrakash Bhalla listed as the flat owner where raman resides ... the establishment of the name was done way back .. & has been consistently shown ...</font>

<font face="Georgia, Times New Roman, Times, serif" size="3" color="#0000ff">
</font>

<font face="Georgia, Times New Roman, Times, serif" size="3" color="#0000ff">
</font>

<font face="Georgia, Times New Roman, Times, serif" size="3" color="#0000ff">On point 3 ... ahem to be divorced one has to be married .. so is MIHIR already married .. is marriage a foregone conclusion ... also since u picked up on some minute points in the serial .. have another kostin ... in the same episode .. Mihir told Mihika their wedding was in March ... so is their divorce track starting after march ??</font>

if u think about the third point..this track is not about divorce...its about raman who dont want to seperate from ishita...it also foreshadows about kajal who will try to get cozy to raman..so its may be about the point where she will try something like that..raman will push her away bcoz he dont want divorce..this may be for little bit realization for him or for us viewers to show that he cant even think of getting divorce from ishita..
i thought this way..correct me if i am wrong and ofcourse..they hv drag this punjabi coocking scene to introduce to purnima..in the same way the showed raman helping ishita in surgery to introduce suraj the next problem in ishra relation

Originally posted by: Tunaraj

Redwine1. Lol sweetie I know the name has already been established the point of foreshadowing is to link two points. In this case to link Raman and Poornima. Sorry if it went over your head. :(.

On the divorce u have a point but I hope that doesn't mean it's ISHRA.

On the punjabi food stuff Ishita herself was telling her mom that she doesn't know how to cook punjabi dishes yesterday. And if she thinks she makes great punjabi food y the cookbooks ??

Jus sayin ;)

redwine1. Sorry if I offended you. Silly how worked up we all get over a soap ( myself included). I think I missed getting my point across I think criticism is of the CV and their brash way of throwing things together versus a more subtle effort. But I guess at the end of the day it a daily soap so it is what it is. I think the superior performance by the cast is what makes us crave the best ;)

Originally posted by: Tunaraj

redwine1. Sorry if I offended you. Silly how worked up we all get over a soap ( myself included). I think I missed getting my point across I think criticism is of the CV and their brash way of throwing things together versus a more subtle effort. But I guess at the end of the day it a daily soap so it is what it is. I think the superior performance by the cast is what makes us crave the best ;)

Actually while we shall look at logical connections to make dramatic conclusions CVs will be doing the reverse .. Remember this is a Kekta show we must enjoy the ride until...