Page
of
1VANI KA PARTNER 24.1
🏏WPL 2026: Match 15: RCB W vs DC W at Vadodara on 24/01/26🏏
I hate this so much
AR GETS PENDRIVE 25.1
Gomzi come back
Anupamaa 24 Jan 2026 Written Update & Daily Discussions Thread
KRK Arrested
Republic Rhythms: Aazadi Quest SEASON 2 ~ Round 1
Which OG Cast Member Would You Like To See Returning Next?
Sara Ali Khan Unfollows Orry On Instagram
Palash was caught in bed
Parenthood
What movie would you like Ranveer Singh to do after Dhurandhar 2?
Arshad Warsi Vs Prabhas
Gadar Was Offered To Govinda
🏏New Zealand vs India 3rd T20I in Guwahati @ 7 PM IST🏏
Originally posted by: Neutral2
@amritat
Partiality is partiality even if it is in the name of custom. If Draupadi want an intercast marriage she should first give chance to karn. In the ved it is not mention that brahmin is an upper cast and sudra is a lower cast. All are equal. Only society make upper and lower cast. Cast is divided on their work not by status.We all know that she chooses Arjun before the swayamver.Secondly, if Draupadi is strict to custom/ society rule then she should not marry to 5 men. Obviously karn will taunt him.But she did tapsaya to forget the memory of previous husband which wh**e wont do. At that time sex is only used to give birth to new life not for enjoyment. Hence in this regard she is superior to todays world one man woman.For me even man marry more than one woman is equal to woman marry more than one man.As per jaydrath case it was either draupadi or arjun who beg for his life. I am sure yudi is not.
Originally posted by: Neutral2
@amritat
Partiality is partiality even if it is in the name of custom. If Draupadi want an intercast marriage she should first give chance to karn. In the ved it is not mention that brahmin is an upper cast and sudra is a lower cast. All are equal. Only society make upper and lower cast. Cast is divided on their work not by status.We all know that she chooses Arjun before the swayamver.
Secondly, if Draupadi is strict to custom/ society rule then she should not marry to 5 men. Obviously karn will taunt him.But she did tapsaya to forget the memory of previous husband which wh**e wont do. At that time sex is only used to give birth to new life not for enjoyment. Hence in this regard she is superior to todays world one man woman.For me even man marry more than one woman is equal to woman marry more than one man.
As per jaydrath case it was either draupadi or arjun who beg for his life. I am sure yudi is not.
Originally posted by: sanayabarunlove
My friend is right. When it comes to discussing dharma, we all have perspectives. And they change according to our favourite characters. It is quite clear you like Karna and we respect that.Draupadi married Arjuna because no Kshatriya was able to complete the task. She rejected Karna because she as a woman didn't want to marry a man who held a lower caste. You mentioned in you own post that the swayamwar was held solely for Kshatriyas, if that was the case then your point that all castes are same is not valid. Then it should have been an open swayamwar, right?And secondly, so what if she didn't want to marry Karna? For a mere statement, you cannot ask you friend to disrobe a woman. I don't intend to pick all the faults in Karna, but the vastraharan was mostly his provocation. Next, jayadrath was spared because yudhishtir asks his brothers to do so. Please get your facts right.
Originally posted by: Neutral2
Swayamwer is held for kshatriya because they want cast marriage. Even all kshatriya are not allowed. Only kings or princes are allowed.If she is ready for intercast then karn was given first chance.I admit that her choice matter but her justification that she would not marry a suta is wrong/partial.She should held a choice ceramony.Karn should never say to disrobe her. Even wh**e should not be treated like draupadi was treated. But draupadi was lawfully won by dury apart from shakuni magic dice.Many time yudi taunt draupadi when she was unable to walk. I have said karn was equal dharmraj to yudi or slightly less. In one version draupadi said to karn that he get ang raajya in daan at swayamver. Who knows what happen because english version of ved vyas become short.Yaa you are right yudi said not to kill jaydrath. Even he forgive keechak. But draupadi and bhim killed keechak. May be time and situation was different.I have said draupadi was little bit partial. Thats the reason she fell down from hill.
Which version are u referring too?Originally posted by: Neutral2
Swayamwer is held for kshatriya because they want cast marriage. Even all kshatriya are not allowed. Only kings or princes are allowed.If she is ready for intercast then karn was given first chance.I admit that her choice matter but her justification that she would not marry a suta is wrong/partial.She should held a choice ceramony.
Karn should never say to disrobe her. Even wh**e should not be treated like draupadi was treated. But draupadi was lawfully won by dury apart from shakuni magic dice.Many time yudi taunt draupadi when she was unable to walk. I have said karn was equal dharmraj to yudi or slightly less. In one version draupadi said to karn that he get ang raajya in daan at swayamver. Who knows what happen because english version of ved vyas become short.
Yaa you are right yudi said not to kill jaydrath. Even he forgive keechak. But draupadi and bhim killed keechak. May be time and situation was different.
I have said draupadi was little bit partial. Thats the reason she fell down from hill.