You weaken your own case by adopting a position which is not only extremist but manifestly and demonstrably false. For example, nobody that I know of blames any of these on any woman:
Crucification of Christ;
Assassination of Julius Caesar;
Betrayal and murder of Hussein in Karbala;
Destruction of Baghdad ("progressive Islam") by Mongols;
European Colonialism;
Near-extinction of Native Americans;
Slavery and Racism;
First World War;
Second World War;
Atomic bombing of Japan;
crimes of Hitler, Pol Pot, Al Qaida etc;
Titanic disaster;
Jewish Holocaust;
Hindu Holocaust (~80 million in last millennium);
Assasinations of Lincoln, Gandhi, and JFK ;
Genocides in Armenia, Rwanda, Bosnia, Bangladesh, Southern Sudan, etc.
I could go on and on, but you get the idea. This is a broad scan of human history, not just some cherry-picked region or period.
Have you ever read Mahabharat, even a condensed version? I can't imagine just who holds Dropadi responsible for that war and consequent disasters? Certainly not anyone in his right mind. At a higher plane, that war is depicted as pre-destined in which various people played their cosmically assigned roles. At the human plane, it is normally blamed on Duryodhan, followed by people like Bhishma, Drona, Karna, etc who placed loyalty to their evil king ahead of justice and righteousness. If anything, Dropadi is one of the victims: she lost her son to the war, prior to that was gambled away by her husband, and also suffered the humiliation of attempted disrobing in Duryodhan's court (which was unsuccessful, and is often cited as an example of how God helps His sincere devotees).
We can certainly discuss specific instances where a specific person or group deserves greater credit or blame than others. However, as a general rule, it seems self-evident to me that human civilization is what both men and women have made it, and they are both responsible for its achievements as well as failures. Anything else is petty politics, often facilitated by ignorance.
380