Without prejuidice - Page 6

so I have to take permission what judgment should I pass for gauri ?..why giving me advice that I should not pass judgement about gauri when she has not shown .why so much problem if I crictize gauri and yes I wil say gauri defenitely enjoying life eating pizza going dico with new boyfriend

I thought you were open to discussion - it was not about what you can post/not post. Sorry if you thought that I am asking you or other members not to pass judgement - I used we - includes me and others and the argument from my side was to let wait to see if Gauri is still negative. Now it is clear, I will not make any argument.

everytime it look when there is major operation going to do it look gauri is coming to major operation ..but gauri does not come .if gauri really coming what can make gauri come back .anyways let gauri live with attitude and enjoying life in foregin country

Forget about gauri and let us go back to the original subject.

My problem with Sanchi is different. I'm fine and in fact, happy that they decided to show there's life after rape and the victim can get justice and be happy. I don't think the actress is very good, that's a different issue, but content-wise that part is great! What I hate is that this doesn't seem organic. I can totally accept that Sanchi wasn't affected and even forgot her earlier molestation attempt by the college guys. I can't accept that she didn't care that her actual rapist and instrument for change-Saurabh- tried to rape her in her own house just the day before she was actually raped. Didn't she try to resist him then? Didn't she threaten the servant who saved her in the nick of time? Didn't she go to the party where she was actually raped after all of this had happened? It seemed like she was upset not because she was raped, but because Saurabh washed his hands off her after he raped her. She was upset not because she was taken advantage of without her knowledge, but because she was not getting marriage with him after the fact--that he was refusing to acknowledge it. For me, that spoils the whole essence of the message.

Originally posted by: aparnauma

Leaves if people are not interested in watching Sanchi's story that doesn't mean they are prejudiced against rape victims.

There are lot of people who bash Ganga saying that she is scheming and plotted to get into Singh house and make a place for herself in the family.

That was a story of an orphan who never received love or affection from anybody till she met Singhs and just because she wanted to stay with them and liked the life they have shown her they bash her how is that not a prejudice?

Sanchi is a spolt brat with no reason to behave the way she did and one day she gets molested and everybody forgets what kind of🤬 she has been till then

Ganga trying to get a life for herself makes her a villain

Sanchi who tried to snatch someone's happiness out of pure spite is acceptable?

Supporting a rape victim's struggle for justice and second chance at life is something and forgetting everything that she has done is something else altogether.

Originally posted by: SPuja

We do not know if she was the same Dr. Gauri in Mumbai- it is complete suspense what happened to her (even in Mubai, they did not show her, telling nurse to let Jagya wait etc.). Why should we presume? The way Jagya was - if they did not show his redemption - I could not believe that he has changed, same is with Sanchi and Ratan Singh. We know they have changed because we saw their story. So let creatives decide whether they want to show a negative Gauri or a redeemed Gauri - passing judgement without knowing her story is not good.

your logic is extremely funny Cvs did show Jagya telling Sumitra he found out where Gauri works now gathering information from her previous hospital Gauri works in Somani hospital now and second think for yourself why would any other doctor say to nurse let Jagya keep waiting outside Cvs did not show her face but through nurse action and what she told Jagya it clearly looked Gauri scolded her She told nurse I don't care let him wait outside .You believe or not but they did tell it was same Gauri and second i fail to understand your logic Why you think we are passing judgement on her without seeing her story ?What cvs have shown us on the basis of that we are passing our judgement They haven't shown her redeemed so it means she has not redeemed How can we believe she has redeemed when till her last appearance they have shown in her negative self ?You don't want to believe it is same Gauri we believe cvs told us When they will show her redemption we will believe she has changed Till so far how many clues they gave us she does not look changed

Originally posted by: sowmya_jairam

My problem with Sanchi is different. I'm fine and in fact, happy that they decided to show there's life after rape and the victim can get justice and be happy. I don't think the actress is very good, that's a different issue, but content-wise that part is great! What I hate is that this doesn't seem organic. I can totally accept that Sanchi wasn't affected and even forgot her earlier molestation attempt by the college guys. I can't accept that she didn't care that her actual rapist and instrument for change-Saurabh- tried to rape her in her own house just the day before she was actually raped. Didn't she try to resist him then? Didn't she threaten the servant who saved her in the nick of time? Didn't she go to the party where she was actually raped after all of this had happened? It seemed like she was upset not because she was raped, but because Saurabh washed his hands off her after he raped her. She was upset not because she was taken advantage of without her knowledge, but because she was not getting marriage with him after the fact--that he was refusing to acknowledge it. For me, that spoils the whole essence of the message.

There are so many girls who become rape victims for no fault of their own, who have no support and no means of getting justice or moving on in life. Ganga was one until she met Jagya. Sanchi on the other hand had a family who supported her through everything, who kept taking care of her with or without her consent, who fought for her. She misused all of that. She knew the guy she supposedly loved was bad--he had already tried to rape her afterall. She still went to him even after this fact, even after her family told her not to, going so far as to threaten the poor servant who only tried to save her and so she is equally at fault in this case. It's like if you jump in the fire knowing you'll get burnt and then cry foul when you do. Sanchi is not the flagbearer for the message of getting justice and being happy after being raped. Ganga is, in the true sense. Combine with the fact that Sanchi's backstory is highly unflattering for the character and the actress herself is not the best, you have a character and a story that doesn't make sense and is not well liked.

Very well said I think you have put people who are not impressed with Sanchi's story their feelings very well Most of us feel same way

exactly hina and i dont understand why again and again saying gauri is not shown for long time .dont v know that gauri is not shown for long time ?.v r not new to balika vadhu .v also watch balika vadhu from begning .v also know gauri is not shown for long time . and what judgement should v pass about gauri how can anyone tell this to us . u can give ur opinion that whether gauri is redemeed or not u can tell us why do u think gauri is redemeed or not but dont tell us v should not pass judgement about gauri dont stop us what v feel about gauri character .