|| SHAHEER SHEIKH || { Conquerer of Sleep - Gudakesa ARJUNA } #AT30 - Page 76

aaj kal AT pe koi nahin aatha kya hua hain sabko????

Krishna was like a father scolding his son, poor arjun.
Helpless and confused, brother burns hand, wife burns his heart, krishna burns his heart.
Burn baby burn.

Originally posted by: navya19

aaj kal AT pe koi nahin aatha kya hua hain sabko????

Originally posted by: Medha.S

Krishna was like a father scolding his son, poor arjun.
Helpless and confused, brother burns hand, wife burns his heart, krishna burns his heart.
Burn baby burn.

nahin no father son equation they are of same age group right so I think they should have the friendship only the most intellectual friend consoling a ferocious friend and angry with a subtle humble innocent friend

Originally posted by: frappie

koi baat nahin nishu di just got to know ur name hi jo hain woh discuss kar lenge and seriously aaj arya arya karti toh sab milke usse thapad marte including bhrata krishn

I really didnt like today's episode shown through the convoluted prism of distortedArjun-Krishna relationship.

Hey I dont think todays episode was actually bad I do accept that Krishna and Arjun are like body and soul who are the incarnation of nar and narayana but krishna is a person who rose above dharma so it is obvious that parth followed his swadharma by accepting the conditions of his jesth bhratha and so did yuddhi.But an innocent pious woman got insulted .Considering Arjun he never revolted during the VH which according to madhav was wrong and he has every right to be angry.This is my interpretation

Also madhav did not tell anything in particular to paarth he was actually angry with the entire lot of brothers for him his sakhis feelings were most important considering the intensity of the situation and he never said anything harsh he just said I will forgive once my sakhi forgives you right so it is completely justified...

Originally posted by: frappie

Hey I dont think todays episode was actually bad I do accept that Krishna and Arjun are like body and soul who are the incarnation of nar and narayana but krishna is a person who rose above dharma so it is obvious that parth followed his swadharma by accepting the conditions of his jesth bhratha and so did yuddhi.But an innocent pious woman got insulted .Considering Arjun he never revolted during the VH which according to madhav was wrong and he has evry right to be angry.This is my interpretation

One can contort to see that angle 😉. I am not talkin about what he did or not. Just that didnt like today's interpretation of their relationship. No offense...

Originally posted by: raj_a_p

One can contort to see that angle 😉. I am not talkin about what he did or not. Just that didnt like today's interpretation of their relationship. No offense...

any time dude your opinion your wish I just put up my opinion u have every right to contradict and put up your opinion 😊

Raj bhrata- u mean Madhav parth p kabhi angry nhi hue.🤓