agree with u completely! there is a disconnect and a rushed, slightly surreal feel that is really coming through for me at the moment. thakursa was their ace, the catalyst, the direct and indirect reason for every awful thing that has happened in paro and rudra's life since the show started! and for his villainy to be so easily swept under the rug like this just doesn't justify his character for me. he is not a bumbling village idiot, he was a king and he thrived and remained undetected for years!
and for the love story to work attention must be given to both the female lead and the male, it cant always be balanced but i have to feel that both r equally important for the story and for each other. it should be about how they relate to those around them, to themselves and their own lives as much as being about how they relate to each other. but i always feel like paro is only there just to prop up and further rudra's story, if he didn't exist then there would be no need for her.
a mainly female audience will most likely empathise and sympathise with the female lead more and if they dont allow us to connect to her or feel her importance, her pain, her reasoning, her thoughts, her fears then how will we care what happens to her. there have been some beautiful rare moments when i've thought 'aha, there she is' and then just as suddenly the moments r lost amidst the excessive avalanche of rudra's pain and despair and tears.
i feel like the cv's r just incessantly bashing me over the head with how traumatised he is, when in fact i want to know why paro isn't more upset with everything that's happened to her - where is her angst? the writers seem confused about what makes people invest their time and patience and love into a show and i really hope they figure this out soon. they have great actors and a great central premise and they could do so much more with them.