Originally posted by: EtherealRati
exactly...it contradicted both...ya an average mother in law toh would have decided ab nahi hone doogi in shaadi ...yaha toh anusuya actually proposed the marriage...i agrree it wasnt in good taste...it kinda broke my heart...đ...poori story mein puru anu ka itna string connection dikha kar ...they are showing such kind of scenes now
I sooo agreee...what was that treatment to chankya ...who treats their acharya like that ???..neither he was offered a seat, nor asked to join rajtilak...he was just standing there...standing and standing...and porus was noticing this but not doing anything about it...he should have talked to chankya after that...shama maangna was such a necessity ...he should have said something like ki shama kijiyega mujhe acharya ki main aapki baat ka maan nahi rakh paaya par mujhein umeed hain aap mere vichaaro se bhi shayad kahi na kahi sehmat honge...main jaanto hoon ki aap samjhenge ki mera lakshya aapki bhavnao ko thes pahuchana nahi thi tha ...bas apni maatrbhoomi ki laaj ko bachana tha. Ek proper session was needed after alex left ...because porus actually did crossed the bar while talking to chankya in front of alexander...but yaha toh kisi ko koi farak hi nahi pad raha. Will be waiting for your analysis. đ¤