What CV wanted to show through that scene

EtherealRati thumbnail
16th Anniversary Thumbnail Trailblazer Thumbnail + 5
Posted: 7 years ago
#1
Okay i first thought ...why should i even write it here ...but then i thought likh hi deti hoon...i so disliked the tula scene today...what was that...ek payal se koi upar uth jayeha itna...and moreover...sab sona daal rahe the and laachi put chandi there ...and is laachi actually allowed to put anything in the first place ????..abhi woh maharani nahi hain...banegi in future..and everyone thought ki laachi and puru ki shaadi mein shayad question aayega ..but laachi seemed so sure about it already...though i am happy that it didnt followed the cliche stuff but still a maharaja getting married to dasyu was a thing of issue at that time...and even if they wanted to show so called symbolism in the puru laachi love story and thus bring out this illogical scene...what was the need to push anusuya in between that...what cvs wanted to show that laachi ka pyar for puru is more pure than anusuya ka pyar. Kya ek maa ke pyaar ka comparision kabhi bhi premika ke saath kiya ja sakta hain...why was anusuya involved in it...ek toh itna illogical scene ...upar se dragging a mothers v/s premika symbolism...disappointing...from like last three episodes...chanakya is not being treated nicely...today it was a kinda insult for anusuya...bas laachi puru hi great hain bhai aur sab toh pagal hain...and anusuya is a sweetheart ...she will be an amazing mother in law ...but unfortunately it started like this which left a bad taste in my mouth atleast.

Created

Last reply

Replies

121

Views

5.1k

Users

9

Likes

185

Frequent Posters

sashashyam thumbnail
13th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 7 years ago
#2
I agree completely with you, Surbhi. It contradicted both the laws of physics 😉 and, far more important, the supremacy of maternal love over all others.

It was silly and uncalled for, and the average mother in law wouldn't have liked it at all. Anusuya is above all this, but even so it was in poor taste.

I felt even more strongly about Chanakya being treated like a piece of unwanted furniture during the rajtilak and the tulaabhar ceremonies.😡

I plan to cover all this in a post I shall do tomorrow.

Shyamala Di
Edited by sashashyam - 7 years ago
EtherealRati thumbnail
16th Anniversary Thumbnail Trailblazer Thumbnail + 5
Posted: 7 years ago
#3

Originally posted by: Priya258

I too felt the same😒

🤗
pritirays thumbnail
18th Anniversary Thumbnail Stunner Thumbnail Fascinator 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 7 years ago
#4
Ek tu Puru-Lachi romantic scenes thik se aate hi nahin, kahin se they don't feel like a couple in love to me and uper se ye forced scene! Looked way too fake.
I was hoping Anusuya ka jewellery will make that scale move! But alas - Puru bahut bhari ho gaya hai sacchi main! 😆
sashashyam thumbnail
13th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 7 years ago
#5
Exactly. That is what they should have shown. that a mother's love outweighs all other loves.The way it was done, it was in poor taste, besides being impossible in terms of physics.

I also agree with you about Puru and Laachi as a couple.

Shyamala Aunty

Originally posted by: pritirays

Ek tu Puru-Lachi romantic scenes thik se aate hi nahin, kahin se they don't feel like a couple in love to me and uper se ye forced scene! Looked way too fake.

I was hoping Anusuya ka jewellery will make that scale move! But alas - Puru bahut bhari ho gaya hai sacchi main! 😆

luckySnow thumbnail
7th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail
Posted: 7 years ago
#6
Krishna satayabhama wala rip off hai
EtherealRati thumbnail
16th Anniversary Thumbnail Trailblazer Thumbnail + 5
Posted: 7 years ago
#7

Originally posted by: sashashyam

I agree completely with you, Surbhi. It contradicted both the laws of physics 😉 and, far more important, the supremacy of maternal love over all others.


It was silly and uncalled for, and the average mother in law wouldn't have liked it at all. Anusuya is above all this, but even so it was in poor taste.

I felt even more strongly about Chanakya being treated like a piece of unwanted furniture during the rajtilak and the tulaabhar ceremonies.😡

I plan to cover all this in a post I shall do tomorrow.

Shyamala Di

exactly...it contradicted both...ya an average mother in law toh would have decided ab nahi hone doogi in shaadi ...yaha toh anusuya actually proposed the marriage...i agrree it wasnt in good taste...it kinda broke my heart...💔...poori story mein puru anu ka itna string connection dikha kar ...they are showing such kind of scenes now
I sooo agreee...what was that treatment to chankya ...who treats their acharya like that ???..neither he was offered a seat, nor asked to join rajtilak...he was just standing there...standing and standing...and porus was noticing this but not doing anything about it...he should have talked to chankya after that...shama maangna was such a necessity ...he should have said something like ki shama kijiyega mujhe acharya ki main aapki baat ka maan nahi rakh paaya par mujhein umeed hain aap mere vichaaro se bhi shayad kahi na kahi sehmat honge...main jaanto hoon ki aap samjhenge ki mera lakshya aapki bhavnao ko thes pahuchana nahi thi tha ...bas apni maatrbhoomi ki laaj ko bachana tha. Ek proper session was needed after alex left ...because porus actually did crossed the bar while talking to chankya in front of alexander...but yaha toh kisi ko koi farak hi nahi pad raha. Will be waiting for your analysis. 🤗
luckySnow thumbnail
7th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail
Posted: 7 years ago
#8

Originally posted by: EtherealRati

Okay i first thought ...why should i even write it here ...but then i thought likh hi deti hoon...i so disliked the tula scene today...what was that...ek payal se koi upar uth jayeha itna...and moreover...sab sona daal rahe the and laachi put chandi there ...and is laachi actually allowed to put anything in the first place ????..abhi woh maharani nahi hain...banegi in future..and everyone thought ki laachi and puru ki shaadi mein shayad question aayega ..but laachi seemed so sure about it already...though i am happy that it didnt followed the cliche stuff but still a maharaja getting married to dasyu was a thing of issue at that time...and even if they wanted to show so called symbolism in the puru laachi love story and thus bring out this illogical scene...what was the need to push anusuya in between that...what cvs wanted to show that laachi ka pyar for puru is more pure than anusuya ka pyar. Kya ek maa ke pyaar ka comparision kabhi bhi premika ke saath kiya ja sakta hain...why was anusuya involved in it...ek toh itna illogical scene ...upar se dragging a mothers v/s premika symbolism...disappointing...from like last three episodes...chanakya is not being treated nicely...today it was a kinda insult for anusuya...bas laachi puru hi great hain bhai aur sab toh pagal hain...and anusuya is a sweetheart ...she will be an amazing mother in law ...but unfortunately it started like this which left a bad taste in my mouth atleast.


Atleast Alexander clear hai...Uski maa sabse upar uske liye😆 chank ke saath Bura hua hai...Porus ke fans pehle se hi divided the aab aur conflicted honge...baki Rohit ki acting aur Alexander Ka naam makes things difficult
Edited by luckySnow - 7 years ago
EtherealRati thumbnail
16th Anniversary Thumbnail Trailblazer Thumbnail + 5
Posted: 7 years ago
#9

Originally posted by: pritirays

Ek tu Puru-Lachi romantic scenes thik se aate hi nahin, kahin se they don't feel like a couple in love to me and uper se ye forced scene! Looked way too fake.

I was hoping Anusuya ka jewellery will make that scale move! But alas - Puru bahut bhari ho gaya hai sacchi main! 😆

lol...i agree...the show has covered the love between anusuya and puru in much more detail then puru ki love story..puru aur laachi best of friends jyaada lagte hain than couple in love...when puru said na ki pyaar chahiye us tule mein or something..i didnt got his meaning ...when anusuya got up and put her aabhooshan there and puru looked at laachi...i though he wanted to tell laachi ki ab dekho...uthega yeh...but unfortunately scene completely kuch aur hi tha...what i dont get is ...ki agar laachi ka hi dikhana tha toh annu ko beech mein laane ki jarurat thi nahi bilkul.
pritirays thumbnail
18th Anniversary Thumbnail Stunner Thumbnail Fascinator 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 7 years ago
#10

Originally posted by: EtherealRati

lol...i agree...the show has covered the love between anusuya and puru in much more detail then puru ki love story..puru aur laachi best of friends jyaada lagte hain than couple in love...when puru said na ki pyaar chahiye us tule mein or something..i didnt got his meaning ...when anusuya got up and put her aabhooshan there and puru looked at laachi...i though he wanted to tell laachi ki ab dekho...uthega yeh...but unfortunately scene completely kuch aur hi tha...what i dont get is ...ki agar laachi ka hi dikhana tha toh annu ko beech mein laane ki jarurat thi nahi bilkul.


Desperate attempt by CVs to convince that Puru and Lacchi are a couple! 😆 Jab actors se nahin ho raha to director ki laga rahe hain ... 😆
Edited by pritirays - 7 years ago

Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".