Bamni will die

First Previous

Page

Next Last

Frequent Posters

Cold coffee_mania

@Fruitcustard_9

Stunner

+ 3

Posted: 7 years ago

#41

Alex ki vajah se trp dint decreases , Persian track was very gud.many peope had given up poras coz unreasonable track of paurav rashtra. Puru ke faras yatra se bahut trp increase ho gayi

If alex part is removed from d story , there is nothing in d story left except bekaar ka drama.

How easily alex Persian fight is said 2 be reason of decrease trp, when d episode was not fully dedicated 2 him , paurav rashtra unnecessary drama was also

Edited by deepikagupta9 - 7 years ago

Quote

luckySnow

@luckySnow

Dazzler

Posted: 7 years ago

#42

Originally posted by: deepikagupta9
Alex ki vajah se trp dint decreases , Persian track was very gud.many peope had given up poras coz unreasonable track of paurav rashtra. Puru ke faras yatra se bahut trp increase ho gayi

If alex part is removed from d story , there is nothing in d story left except bekaar ka drama.

How easily alex Persian fight is said 2 be reason of decrease trp, when d episode was not fully dedicated 2 him , paurav rashtra unnecessary drama was also

Alexander ke bina poras ka koi bajood hi nahin hai🥱

Quote

Looks like you are new here. Register for free, learn and contribute.

486792

Hibernated

Posted: 7 years ago

#43

Originally posted by: luckySnow

Alexander ke bina poras ka koi bajood hi nahin hai🥱

How can you say that? Porus was a brave and noble king irrespective of Alexander's existence.Moreover he was a good person who took care of his subjects.There are many unsung heroes who lay down their lives for their nation.They are extremely brave,courageous and have nerves of steel.

It's just that he is known in history for resisting Alexander.But it was due to his nature and coz of the person he was that he faced Alexander.Had Porus been like Ambhi Jr then he would have surrendered.But he faced Alexander coz he was Porus.

Had there been anyone else in Alexander's place even then Porus would have stood up to defend his country.And tell me one thing,Alexander fought many battles in his lifetime and faced several adversaries.But out of them all why is Porus remembered?

It is because the Battle of Hydaspes crushed Alexander's ambition to conquer India.We can debate on who won and who lost.But it cannot be denied that Purushottam's forces caused severe and irreparable losses to Alexander.

So naa Porus ka wajood Alexander ke bharose hai naa Alexander ka wajood Porus ke bharose.Both men were the masters of their own fate.

Quote

luckySnow

@luckySnow

Dazzler

Posted: 7 years ago

#44

Originally posted by: LawlessLawyer
How can you say that? Porus was a brave and noble king irrespective of Alexander's existence.Moreover he was a good person who took care of his subjects.There are many unsung heroes who lay down their lives for their nation.They are extremely brave,courageous and have nerves of steel.
It's just that he is known in history for resisting Alexander.But it was due to his nature and coz of the person he was that he faced Alexander.Had Porus been like Ambhi Jr then he would have surrendered.But he faced Alexander coz he was Porus.
Had there been anyone else in Alexander's place even then Porus would have stood up to defend his country.And tell me one thing,Alexander fought many battles in his lifetime and faced several adversaries.But out of them all why is Porus remembered?
It is because the Battle of Hydaspes crushed Alexander's ambition to conquer India.We can debate on who won and who lost.But it cannot be denied that Purushottam's forces caused severe and irreparable losses to Alexander.

So naa Porus ka wajood Alexander ke bharose hai naa Alexander ka wajood Porus ke bharose.Both men were the masters of their own fate.

whatever he is known only because of alexander ...and we should thank greek and persian writers who wrote about him otherwise poras would have lost in history...what we indians know about him. Nothing at all...just that he fought alexander...that roxana tied rakhi...and that famous surrender...otherwise nothing else...

Quote

Meghna333

@Meghna333

Beginner

Posted: 7 years ago

#45

History of Ancient India starts from Alexander's conquest, all that we have before that are mostly assumptions. We know about brave and great heros like Porus only due to Alexander.

Quote

486792

Hibernated

Posted: 7 years ago

#46

@luckySnow,If,according to you,'Wajood' or existence only means the number of chapters dedicated to a person dedicated in a history book then very well Porus is knowm in history coz of Alexander and that he gave Alexander the toughest fight ever.

The difference which Alexander's presence brought to the scenario was that unlike any other invader Alexander was honourable enough to recognise the respect his foe and due to which Porus became his ally later.As Shyamala Aunty mentioned in one of her other posts,Skandagupta too defeated the barbaric Huns and protected the entire North India but Porus is more celebrated coz his opponent was someone as glorious as Alexander.

But for me and several others the term 'Wajood' or 'existence' has a different meaning.A person's existence depends on his actions.It's his/her actions which determine whether his/her existence was fruitful or not.

Porus was great coz he fought for his country and he would have fought with the same valour and strength even if it had been anyone else in the place of Alexander.He did his duty which made his existence a worthy one.It wouldn't have mattered even if he was lost in the pages of history after that coz he committed the right act

Again when it comes to history it's highly ambiguous.Indian historians too deserve due credit for its not only the Greek and the Persian records which mentioned Porus.For every notable event in history was recorded in one way or the other.If the Greek records mentioned Porus then the Indian records provided whatever detail there is about him no matter how minute it is.

Quote

486792

Hibernated

Posted: 7 years ago

#47

Originally posted by: Meghna333
History of Ancient India starts from Alexander's conquest, all that we have before that are mostly assumptions. We know about brave and great heros like Porus only due to Alexander.

This is true for Alexander's invasion changed the course of Ancient India's history forever.It acted as a catalyst for several events.As I have said earlier,heroes emerge only in the face of the dire adversities.

I am not denying that it's due to Alexander that people know about Porus for its a fact.

However I do not agree that Porus's entire existence depended on Alexander.He was always a noble and brave hero and he would have faced any enemy in the same manner though not just any foe could have immortalised him in the pages of history like Alexander did.His actions would have remained the same though even if he would have remained an unsung and unknown hero lost in the pages of history.

We can very well say that Porus got his due recognition in history coz of Alexander.

But saying that Porus' existence depended on Alexander is too far fetched 😆

Quote

BabyHimavari

@BabyHimavari

Trailblazer

+ 4

Posted: 7 years ago

#48

Originally posted by: LawlessLawyer
This is true for Alexander's invasion changed the course of Ancient India's history forever.It acted as a catalyst for several events.As I have said earlier,heroes emerge only in the face of the dire adversities.
I am not denying that it's due to Alexander that people know about Porus for its a fact.

However I do not agree that Porus's entire existence depended on Alexander.He was always a noble and brave hero and he would have faced any enemy in the same manner though not just any foe could have immortalised him in the pages of history like Alexander did.His actions would have remained the same though even if he would have remained an unsung and unknown hero lost in the pages of history.

We can very well say that Porus got his due recognition in history coz of Alexander.
But saying that Porus' existence depended on Alexander is too far fetched 😆

and not to forget there is another version of history which said a total different story.. The version mentions that Porus actually drove away alexender and his army from the border of Indian subcontinent causing huge damage to Alex's army😉... It doesn't follow the pattern of Greek history which says that Alexender returned Puru's kingdom, his respect because of his valor, courage and nobility...

Now people follows different tells... the greek one got more recognition and popularity with time.. but we shouldn't forget that even the historians of that time had to live on the shadow of royals so whatever may be... they are bound to write something which favors and satisfies his kings...😛 ... so i don't feel that even the Greek records are totally accurate...

And history of Ancient India starts much before than Alexender's conquest... It starts from the Indus civilization when Alexender didn't even existed... 😛...

Edited by BabyHimavari - 7 years ago

Quote

486792

Hibernated

Posted: 7 years ago

#49

Originally posted by: deepikagupta9
I talked about d serial

I know Deepika😆 You were only referring to the show.

Dunno why the topic always gets diverted to real history

Quote

siyarati

@siyarati

Inactive

Posted: 7 years ago

#50

Originally posted by: EtherealRati
Okay...as soo much has been said about siddharth sir and team on this thread...i would like to defend them...its really easy to say that oh they should have done this way, they should have done that way...audiene like this...audience like that...but its eventually difficult to please the entire audience ...as audience doesnt have a single openion...just your openion...or just my openion that i wish to see my favourite more isnt the complete audience openion...and audience isnt just 20-30 people writing on this forum either...its a very divided space...like some people feel that the audience is screaming for proper alex tracks...others switch the channel when they concentrate on alex tracks because they dont want to watch alex story...they arent interested ...i have live examples regarding this...there is a audience who watches just for pourav rashtra track...me too watch for pourav rashtra only...its just i dont switch on alex scenes...but i am not very fond of them either...sooo asss openions are sooo scattered...they can never please everyone...what will makers concentrate on is what gives them trps...because at the end of day...its business for them ...a single alex track of persia made the show stand at the trps of 0.6 which the show never faced in its entire run...and ofcourse people can say that ipl was running at that time...but ironically/suprisingly...the show actually picked up on the trps in ipl finale week itself..imagine a show was being effected by ipl and the same show gains trp in the finale week itself...and again surprisingly/ironically or even shockingly for many people here who feel that audience cant connect to puru and pourav rashtra track is all drama...the thing which changed in that finale week was that pourav rashtra track was introduced again in the show. So...yaa there is an audience who connect to puru and makers havent failed with their characterization. Its easy to sit and say...oh makers wasted actors time...makers have given these actors their hall for fame for forever...rohittt se pooche koi...agar woh keh de ki porus ne usse kuch na diya ho...ya rati di se hi poochoo...the excitement on her face when she talks about porus is something i can die for...she isss sooo happpy too doo this show...siddharth sir and team has tried doing justice to all characters till the point they can...even mahabharat got a lot of history distortions but it is remembered ...and porus will be remembered too and i am sure about this. In addition, no show on tv till date has got the cinematography porus got...sooo yesss the teammm is also working as hard as the actors are.

Totally agree dear👏. Even I watch the show for PR only. I luv bamni anu and puru.

I agree rohit is dng better as Alex if compared to laksh as puru. But still i like puru more than Alex.

And anu bamni to mere fav h hi😳