TVS - The way I see him

First Previous

Page

Next Last

Frequent Posters

Putija

@PutijaChalhov

Stunner

+ 8

Posted: 13 years ago

#21

Adi changed from bad to good and dropped his emotional baggage and TVS changed from good to bad acquring emotional baggage.😉😆 as he is in love with Sugni😕

Edited by chalhov - 13 years ago

Quote

Hillylove

@Hillylove

Dazzler

Posted: 13 years ago

#22

I guess some people need to come to this side of the world to know the definition of "womanizer." If western men saw Vikram being called womanizer they would laugh him to scorn.😆 Vikram has no game or he would have known what to do with Sugni long time ago, and not to mention Adi could not get him to agree to share room with Sugni. Sometimes we come with some big theories, but it is not based on facts at all.🥱

Excellent Post JulieD, that is what you call a factual reply.

Edited by hillydee - 13 years ago

Quote

Looks like you are new here. Register for free, learn and contribute.

Hillylove

@Hillylove

Dazzler

Posted: 13 years ago

#23

@DJ

No offense, but a womaniser spends money on dolling you up, but never go to any extreme for your family. They do not stand up for you against others, worse their family, not to mention you are next in line for prostitution in your family. Lets be real here, Vikram married a Thakurain not a Bedni initially, you really think if he had wrong intentions, he would make Sugni so important in his life. Sugni is not a Thakurain, she does not require the respect that Vikram has shown her. He showed her this because he is respectful of all women and see them as equal.

A womaniser NEVER give you their Mother's ring. A man only gives the girl he sees as wifey his Mother's ring and that is not womanising.

If your Mother disrespected a womaniser, as Gulabiya did, you would see the worse of him.

Womanisers are men who play with a lot of women, and are never respectful of their feelings. They only spend money on them to make them look beautiful. They do not give them money to improve their lives or their families lives. They would not care if you ruin your life, or if other men use you as toy also.

If the writers want to write about a good, decent, loving man, and you and your like minded viewers see it as womanising, then that is your fault in terms of interpretation, not the cvs or those who really understand what a good man looks like.

No offense.

Quote

nariy

@nariy

Beginner

Posted: 13 years ago

#24

Originally posted by: chalhov
Adi changed from bad to good and dropped his emotional baggage and TVS changed from good to bad acquring emotional baggage.😉😆 as he is in love with Sugni😕

It's not love its lust!!!😉

Quote

Putija

@PutijaChalhov

Stunner

+ 8

Posted: 13 years ago

#25

Originally posted by: nariy
It's not love its lust!!!😉

Had it been Lust there were lot of opportunities for TVS to make use of and if CVs wanted to convey that well it did not appear so to me 😲😕 a lustful man need not announce in front of village that he will marry her and there were other oppurtunities, situations as well to take advantage .

Edited by chalhov - 13 years ago

Quote

DJ..

@DJ..

Sparkler

+ 2

Posted: 13 years ago

#26

Originally posted by: hillydee
@DJ

No offense, but a womaniser spends money on dolling you up, but never go to any extreme for your family. They do not stand up for you against others, worse their family, not to mention you are next in line for prostitution in your family. Lets be real here, Vikram married a Thakurain not a Bedni initially, you really think if he had wrong intentions, he would make Sugni so important in his life. Sugni is not a Thakurain, she does not require the respect that Vikram has shown her. He showed her this because he is respectful of all women and see them as equal.

A womaniser NEVER give you their Mother's ring. A man only gives the girl he sees as wifey his Mother's ring and that is not womanising.

If your Mother disrespected a womaniser, as Gulabiya did, you would see the worse of him.

Womanisers are men who play with a lot of women, and are never respectful of their feelings. They only spend money on them to make them look beautiful. They do not give them money to improve their lives or their families lives. They would not care if you ruin your life, or if other men use you as toy also.

If the writers want to write about a good, decent, loving man, and you and your like minded viewers see it as womanising, then that is your fault in terms of interpretation, not the cvs or those who really understand what a good man looks like.

No offense.

Whether the characterization is warped cannot be ascertained cause the CVs have played it smartly They are sitting on the fence Hopefully soon they will use the current and stir the story towards the possible end.

With regards to my views on the Vikram I see despite all his valor grace and flamboyance. Well all in all how to differentiate between a good man and a bad man best know by a Man only I guess I have said it all 😊

Quote

Hillylove

@Hillylove

Dazzler

Posted: 13 years ago

#27

So, you are saying there is a new definition for womanising and you wrote it? More power to you dear.

Quote

Hillylove

@Hillylove

Dazzler

Posted: 13 years ago

#28

Your view from a man's perspective could also be interpreted as that only a womaniser would do this for a girl, because such love is too big for the average guy.😎

Quote

muktha_cute

@muktha_cute

Dazzler

Posted: 13 years ago

#29

can anyone let me know the meaning of this newly discovered word womanizer

Quote

Saviosaraff

@Saviosaraff

Navigator

Posted: 13 years ago

#30

Originally posted by DJ.

Originally posted by JulieD..

Similarly I view TVS employing Sugni as a driver can well be a ploy to keep her near him and not go astray and fall for any other man.

Sugni had asked Vikram to employ her and after Dhanuma said they did not need any servants in the mansion, he employed her as a driver. She was not Vikram's personal driver

It wasn't Vikram who offered her a job but it was Sugni who asked him for employment and he had left it to Jiji to give her some job in the haveli but Jiji together with Dhanuma refused her any kind of employment, when Amrita intervened and reminded them that they needed a driver for Adi and finally it was Adi who had challenged her that if she could learn to drive by tomorrow morning she could have the job. So Vikram was no where in the picture he only fixed her salary.

Quote

1 2 3 4

TVS - The way I see him - Page 3

Related Topics

Explore Topics