Soham -Neena Pair

One worst thought came in my mind What would happen Soham and neena will be married?😆Both loves money . Both are basically negative. Iam sure their pair will be same as Raunak and Kinnari Pair . Please reply on my posts

Soham and neena, aren't the same. He. may 'love' money, but in a diff than way from neena. He wants money so he can buy drinks for himself.. He tries to get money without working hard. He drinks to drown away in his sorrows.

Neena on the other hand, is scheming and has a very negative and wrong view about everyone who cld be coming close to her getting the property, money. She is a manipulator, has no heart, and just plain negative in every way. All she cares about is getting money. She doesn't even want to spare sohum's kids, when she knows how poor they are, and how much they need money. Her role is pretty sad tho, same old dialogues of all vamps in ekta show.

Soham may be shown as money hungry, but he isn't a negative character. Just crazy/obsessive and wants to be loved, kinda character. He's been through a lot, had a tough life, grew up in a village with Archana's sister, Varsha. He doesn't know much about the etiquettes of the world. He also wasn't literate. Even though, now he is shown to be. Think Archana must have taught it him. He's seen had life and betrayal. Honestly, CVs just ruined his part of the story. He was headed on a positive route. Sigh. Anyway..

As for Neena, she's educated, and comes from a better life. But is acting cheap, filling her husband's ears, to attain her own monetary benefit. She knows his weakness, so always rubs on that, to make him dance by her tunes. Doesn't believe in sharing.. All she wants is the entire property!

See, they are different from each other.. Regardless of them 'loving money'. And these difference is BIG difference !

If Soham was only after money, he would have happily reunited with his parents to get their money. Even if he didn't want to reunite with them, he could have still gone after their property. He has made bad life choices, but he is not at all as money-minded or evil as Neena.

Suppose Soham and neena would get married what will happen

Basically Soham is not reuniting with his family because of gauri kand and he thinks that he and his children dont get any property and other reasons is that he thinks will be underestimated by his parients and by sachin. but he loves money . and he is also negative . He is alchohalic ,Murderrer and thief . Specially when gauri sachin marriage was going to happen . he became phscopath . Infact their were chances of gauri being raped by soham . He was behaving little bit like Ansh virani of Kyunki Saas bhi kabhi bahu Thi .Because of soham -gauri parients have suffered very badly till many of us thinks that he is not negative character.

Originally posted by: rouble_lover

Soham and neena, aren't the same. He. may 'love' money, but in a diff than way from neena. He wants money so he can buy drinks for himself.. He tries to get money without working hard. He drinks to drown away in his sorrows.

Neena on the other hand, is scheming and has a very negative and wrong view about everyone who cld be coming close to her getting the property, money. She is a manipulator, has no heart, and just plain negative in every way. All she cares about is getting money. She doesn't even want to spare sohum's kids, when she knows how poor they are, and how much they need money. Her role is pretty sad tho, same old dialogues of all vamps in ekta show.

Soham may be shown as money hungry, but he isn't a negative character. Just crazy/obsessive and wants to be loved, kinda character. He's been through a lot, had a tough life, grew up in a village with Archana's sister, Varsha. He doesn't know much about the etiquettes of the world. He also wasn't literate. Even though, now he is shown to be. Think Archana must have taught it him. He's seen had life and betrayal. Honestly, CVs just ruined his part of the story. He was headed on a positive route. Sigh. Anyway..

As for Neena, she's educated, and comes from a better life. But is acting cheap, filling her husband's ears, to attain her own monetary benefit. She knows his weakness, so always rubs on that, to make him dance by her tunes. Doesn't believe in sharing.. All she wants is the entire property!

See, they are different from each other.. Regardless of them 'loving money'. And these difference is BIG difference !

Sohum is impulsive. He did not shoot gauri to kill her, but meant to aim at Sachin. But the bulletin hit gauri, who came in front of Sachin to protect him! You can call his shooting gauri, an accident. A murder is someone who kills a person with an intent to murder them, it's often planned. But in this case, it was done on an impulse and he had lost his mind, because of nonsupport from his fam and his stubbornness of getting gauri.

I'm not saying what he did wasn't wrong, it is considered second deg. Murder. But, he isn't a "murderer" so to speak.

He isn't a 'negative' character. Just is impulsive, careless, irresponsible, he got swayed on the wrong path under Balan's company from a young age. It is difficult to tame him back to a city person, but that doesn't mean, he means bad or is a bad person/character. He just haven't allowed himself to be tamed well enough to live a city life.

The Manav in my opinion completely contradicts the original Manav In the show. He too acted very irrationally towards Soham telling him he hates him and didn't accept him etc. that had hurt him Soham a lot! He was getting better, under Archana's care.. But various events happened, that had stopped him from walking in the 'civilized' path. He was known to be a 'holligaan' but that's because that's the kind of life he knew abt, thanks to Balan.

But he no way intent anything bad on anyone! And him RAPING gauri ?!! No way! He tried to kidnap her, force her to marry him, because he was crazy in love with her. Not saying these actions are justified, but like, he since wasn't getting any support from anyone, nor understanding.. He acted rashly excuse all he cld think of was being with Gauri. When you in love, and in a situation where you can't get to your love, it's a true test of time. How we act then determines a lot of thing, but should not entirely be used up judge our character, because, being in love is being in an irrational state of mind, where logic disappears. He never meant to hurt anyone, only wanted ppl to understand him and oblige by his desire. Just didn't know how to act on it in a civil manner and mature manner. He had no ill intentions, towards any person.

And he isn't any way shown money hungry, where he is trying to extract money from his family! Infact he had forbidden his children to keep any relations with the family.

He is insecure abt Sachin and his fam, not because of property, but feels that just how he was betrayed and not understood by his fam, his children wldnt be also, and they too wld have to go through disappointments and he doesn't want that to happen. He doesn't want his children to be treated unfairly by them. This is just his, insecure conditioned mind talking. That is all. And no, he isn't anyone's enemy, just views and blames them all for snatching Gauri away from him, and feels he was treated unfairly, just because he wasn't literate and in the fam's view, not fit for gauri. He was hurt by their thinking. He said, so what if he isn't literate, wldnt he still have feelings??! He believed gauri to be his soulmate.. He just saw everyone to be his enemy whoever opposed him being with gauri. The more got denied, the more stubborn he got! Sigh.

What happened with his fam in regards to gauri, he was EXTREMELY hurt and broken, he doesn't want his kids to have high hopes of support from the fam and then again be heartbroken again.

Just how ankita in his view deserved to be with naren as she is his bride and expecting baby, but despite knowing all, Archana still got Pari married to naren, he feels that to be a betrayal. He understands Ankita's pain, as he too has faced loss like that. So, here.. He didn't want her to get hurt, which she did, which is what his point is.

Forcing Sonu to beg on street is sign of negative ness . then why he is positive

Sure! I agree! He isn't a responsible father figure. But he isn't the scheming type. Which is far negative! He is irresponsible, that does not mean he is negative. If he were selling his kids for money, or torturing his kids for money, then it's a different case. He is irresponsible because he believed he is bad, good for nothing. But later, did you see how he was changing his ways? He started working at a mechanic place, promised his kids to be a better father, cared about his kids brought Pranav present for his birthday, stood up for Ankita! Even Mansi when he learnt she was forced upon by Raunaq. He was working on being better, which proves his authenticity. No matter what your past may have been, if you make the effort to change to be a better human being, the day you decide on the change and work towards implementing it, you are reborn again, as a better person. Realization of it is big! Which happened with Soham. This is proof he isn't bad at heart, just was lost and not a responsible guy before. He at least later recognized his potential. If someone wants to change for the better, disbelieving in his effort or goodness would be discouraging them from improving and living up to their higher potential!

Sohum is impulsive. He did not shoot gauri to kill her, but meant to aim at Sachin. But the bulletin hit gauri, who came in front of Sachin to protect him! You can call his shooting gauri, an accident. A murder is someone who kills a person with an intent to murder them, it's often planned. But in this case, it was done on an impulse and he had lost his mind, because of nonsupport from his fam and his stubbornness of getting gauri.

I'm not saying what he did wasn't wrong, it is considered second deg. Murder. But, he isn't a "murderer" so to speak.

He isn't a 'negative' character. Just is impulsive, careless, irresponsible, he got swayed on the wrong path under Balan's company from a young age. It is difficult to tame him back to a city person, but that doesn't mean, he means bad or is a bad person/character. He just haven't allowed himself to be tamed well enough to live a city life.

The Manav in my opinion completely contradicts the original Manav In the show. He too acted very irrationally towards Soham telling him he hates him and didn't accept him etc. that had hurt him Soham a lot! He was getting better, under Archana's care.. But various events happened, that had stopped him from walking in the 'civilized' path. He was known to be a 'holligaan' but that's because that's the kind of life he knew abt, thanks to Balan.

But he no way intent anything bad on anyone! And him RAPING gauri ?!! No way! He tried to kidnap her, force her to marry him, because he was crazy in love with her. Not saying these actions are justified, but like, he since wasn't getting any support from anyone, nor understanding.. He acted rashly excuse all he cld think of was being with Gauri. When you in love, and in a situation where you can't get to your love, it's a true test of time. How we act then determines a lot of thing, but should not entirely be used up judge our character, because, being in love is being in an irrational state of mind, where logic disappears. He never meant to hurt anyone, only wanted ppl to understand him and oblige by his desire. Just didn't know how to act on it in a civil manner and mature manner. He had no ill intentions, towards any person.

And he isn't any way shown money hungry, where he is trying to extract money from his family! Infact he had forbidden his children to keep any relations with the family.

He is insecure abt Sachin and his fam, not because of property, but feels that just how he was betrayed and not understood by his fam, his children wldnt be also, and they too wld have to go through disappointments and he doesn't want that to happen. He doesn't want his children to be treated unfairly by them. This is just his, insecure conditioned mind talking. That is all. And no, he isn't anyone's enemy, just views and blames them all for snatching Gauri away from him, and feels he was treated unfairly, just because he wasn't literate and in the fam's view, not fit for gauri. He was hurt by their thinking. He said, so what if he isn't literate, wldnt he still have feelings??! He believed gauri to be his soulmate.. He just saw everyone to be his enemy whoever opposed him being with gauri. The more got denied, the more stubborn he got! Sigh.

What happened with his fam in regards to gauri, he was EXTREMELY hurt and broken, he doesn't want his kids to have high hopes of support from the fam and then again be heartbroken again.

Just how ankita in his view deserved to be with naren as she is his bride and expecting baby, but despite knowing all, Archana still got Pari married to naren, he feels that to be a betrayal. He understands Ankita's pain, as he too has faced loss like that. So, here.. He didn't want her to get hurt, which she did, which is what his point is.