Originally posted by: White-Rose
@sweet tania
If purvi exchanged the babies without informing ovi then even ovi is no where behind purvi. When it was time to end this never ending love triangle or square (whatever it was) again she started new history by getting arjun and purvi married without informing purvi about her daughter. It was not like purvi killed ovi's baby. It was a miscarriage or doctor was not able to save the child. But at the end of the day Whatever goes around comes around. Ovi played her game very well. For her benefit she made deal of her parent's happiness, emotionally tortured a bride to give up her groom just few days before marriage, tortured her own child with alcohol in pregnancy ,how badly she treated arjun when purvi was not around
asked a pregnant woman to leave the house in her last days of pregnancy. So in return she was not able to mourn for her child. Thats karma never spare anyone. Not even purvi. Purvi ignored the feelings of a mother in her mahanta and ignored the fact ovi deserves to know about her child and in return she lost the support of onir and arjun both and even lost her child but it does not mean purvi decided the fate of ovi's child. Ovi lost her child coz of accident or alcoho (whatever was the reason ). The way it was ovi's right to know about her child same way it was purvi's right to know with whom she is getting married have a kid with first wife. But for.mahaanta ovi decided to hide the truth and becoz of same truth purvi lost her child. So everything here seems equal. No space for sorry and apology. They should take responsibility of their action instead of playing apology game and move on.
How on earth few months old child was affected for anything? Arjun and purvi sorted out their marital status issue before pari's first bday. Later it was different misunderstanding. And pari is ArVi's child. Its on them what kind of life they wish to give. Neighbour's kids were not affected by their decision. And they should not apologize to others for life they have given to their kid.
I guess its useless to talk about who was more responsible for that deal? In past endless pages of this forum were wasted and conclusion 3 of them r equally responsible. Then why only arjun and purvi should apologize?
But I agree punni was most innocent. I want purvi to say sorry to her. Lol.
Dear white rose
1) in my reply i have not said anything like purvi is responsible for death of ovi's baby... i have only said that she should not replace baby without other parent's permission dats it... so there is not any point regarding purvi killed ovi's baby and all that...its all your own story... not mine...my point is versy simple about child replacement... so first understand dat what point is mentioned by writer... nd ya still you want to continue with your cooking story than plz bold my that particular words where i have said that purvi killed ovi's baby😊
2) you are narrating here ovi's karma ...but main point is... purvi's child replacement idea is not having connection with ovi's karma...yeah ovi lost her baby due to her own karma but purvi's baby replacement idea is result of ovi's karma!!🥱 ... not found any connectivity in your statement.
3) regarding pari's point... not only few month child but grown up adult is also deeply affected due to parent's separation...nd yeah definitly its parent's choice what type of life they wants to give to their child...purvi chooses fatherless life for pari...not interested in discussion of emotional trauma of purvi from my side...so to be short purvi should feel and say sorry to pari after knowing arjun's truth. whether pari is expecting or not but as a viewer so many peoples are seeing that purvi is at fault for her own child pari.when public see such type of parents on television than its not just matter of arvi and pari...public is free to give their opinion regarding purvi's mistake for her own daughter.ovi's point is different as pia is not lovechild neighther arjun is sulking for pia.
4) again you are cooking your story...in previous discussion point was arvi is not having decision power which is written by you...so my reply was if she can take punny's decision than why not for herself?????? i have never mentioned that punni was innocent... if i have written such type of statement than plz bold it...
PS:- in your reply majority of your statements are not related to my words or my opinion...you have written completely new cooking story which is not related to previous conversation...still i am replying you becoz i can't tolerate such a baked story which is replied by u by mentioning my name.