Ovi hiding the truth of pia - Page 6

Originally posted by: punirashakti

Here is no one said Ovi hide Pia's truth frm arjun bcs arjun never love pia jst lyk pari...we said here ovi hide pia's truth frm arjun bcs of only arvi re-union sek...n ovi also said in pr too...

N i'm said here Ovi did ri8 thing to hide Pia's truth from arjun...yes child is a two peoples product not one...bt in Pia's case...here clearly shw hw arjun feel abt pia b4 leap n after leap too...b4 leap he get to knw abt pia...he jst upset with ovi for pia's astithva on earth...he not ask hws pia n her health to doctor n nurse he jst blame ovi n left her alone der with pia...after leap to he jst recalling pari not pia...i agree he spend time with pari only not pia bt its not mean father never even not take other child name wen he missing his child...here openly clear he jst missing pari not pia...here pia doesn't exit for him...so its ri8 decision taken by ovi to stay away pia frm arjun no matter pia is his blood...its a pia's bad luck she hv shamelss n insane father blood...

m again again said here...stay away from Arjun is best not only for Ovi bt also Pia too...Arjun Purvi destroy Pari's childhood n nw dey both deffo destroy her current life to not clearing her misunderstanding for father arjun n her masi ovi...here again arvi shwn der desffo reunion wish without concerting Pari...

wer ovi stay as single mother or maybe happily married life with someone...m sure she take decision of herself so 1stly she deffo concern her daughter pia...unlyk armaan arvi who always full fill der on egos n wishesh 1st over der childrens

Originally posted by: nikki1591

he was in shock and anger. he just found out that he had a child. he did not have time to fully become aware of the fact that this is his child. so his first words w/ anger. and he did end up staying w/ ovi bc he walked out of the hospital w her. and he said that pia is his responsibility too and he would take care of her. if purvi has no right to make a decison for others, then what right does ovi have to make decisons for others? bc its her daughter. its not only her daughter. its arjun too. ovi had no reason to suspect that arjun would not love pia as much as pari untill that point. ovi never said that she believed arjun would not love pia as much as pari, that is an inference that the audience is making. it was her own desire to have pia for herself, only and not share him w. arjun as divorced parents do. now post leap he is shown to be an awful father. he has shown to be missing pari. but has never fought for her just like as shown he never fought for pia. clearly he did not differentiate between either kid despite the mother. as far as pia scences, arjun never spent time w/ pia to recall moments and nor has pia's storyline been revealed so I can't judge for w/e has not been shown and only can judge for the fact that he has not fought for pia with the converstaion regarding pia b/t arjun and purvi

Originally posted by: nikki1591

i wonder how many of the people who say ovi was justified in keeping a child from her father would say the same if the reverse was true. that if it was a father who had kept the child from the mother. would it be justified then. a child is product of two people. father's have rights too but pple think that just bc a woman carries the child, she own it. u may carry that child but that is not the fathers fault that he can't and w/o the father the child would not exist. and father spend the rest of their life taking care of said child so the 9 mnths they biologically couldn't means nothing in comparison to the 50+ years they do. and if woman think that they own said child, then when the father doesn't want the child, and woman don't want abortion they shouldn't ask for child support bc hey u think own the child right?? can't have it both ways. women do not own the child. your right. i would've rather ovi and teju were kept separate from archana who has pretty much destroyed their lives since she came back into it. so depending on who the dysfunctional parent is, whether it be mom or dad, the child should be kept away from them.

1) Purvi was bashed (right fully so ) bc she did not allow ovi to see her dead child but ovi is justified in not allowing arjun to even know of his child existence? and everybody excuse is that bc arjun would not love pia bc the mother was ovi. that was not ovi excuse. her excuse was that she did not want to interrupt arvi married life.

2) but lets say she thought arjun wouldn't love pia as much as pari. what would she base that on??? bc as I remember when ovi was pregnant the first time, it was arjun who was trying to keep their child safe while she was giving medication to her child in the form of alcohol. oh but i forget arjun drove her to drink despite the fact that she married him knowing he loved another. when pari was born arjun stayed up w/ ovi taking care of her. and then with pia he stayed w/ her in the hospital and told her that pia was his responsibility. arjun turned out to be a terrible father but at that moment she did not know that and did not give him a chance to prove it at that time. and IT IS NOT JUST HER CHILD!!! IT'S HIS TOO!!!

3) and ovi did not do this for pia. she did it for herself. she did it for her happiness. keeping pia a secret meant that not sharing pia with arjun. no parent want to share their child w/ a divorce parent but they do so bc it is the right thing for their child. she doesn't want arjun thats fine but Pia sure as hell deserves to have a father. iT'S NOT ABOUT WHAT IS BEST FOR OVI, IT IS ABOUT WHAT IS BEST FOR PIA!!!!and no this does not prove her a strong independent woman. pple say that if she told arjun about the pregnancy the deshmuk family would have convinced her to go back to him and she would have listened😆😆. oh plz since wen has ovi listened to anyone? she married arjun despite their disapproval, she drank while pregnant despite being told no, she spent a night with arjun letting her family think she was going back to him despite manav wanting her to leave. r we honestly supposed to believe that this girl would have listened to her family request. no she does things no matter what anyone says. she is not strong independent woman. a strong independent woman would not marry a guy who was in love w/ another, would not put her child in danger, would not leave her 3 premature child w/ a nanny, would not hide her child's existence from the father. ovi is someone who only cares about her happiness. You are right and theres nothing wrong with that. nobody else who should've been concerned about her happiness was ever concerned about it, so she takes care of her own happiness. I think thats fine. its better to be like that then try to take care of everyone, mess everyones life up and ignore your own in the process. why would she think about anyone else? she has a worthless mother, a useless father, uncaring siblings and a bad ex-husband. theres no reason for her to have EVER been kind to any of these people, let alone unselfish. yes it was wrong and selfish of her to hide pia ok. but what has telling arjun achieved anyways? other than now pia knows she has a dad who doesn't care about her, instead of a dad who may care about her.

Originally posted by: tejaswiniwenham

Originally posted by: sawann

your each and every topics main aim is to bash Purvi and Arjun & left and right specially Purvi

and praise Ovi

if ovi is soo true then why dey are nt shwing her and her innocense

she is only shown to create rift between ArVi otherwise she is nt even shown