Dear Mohini,
I am with you 100%, but as for the reason why PR survives, tell me, have you stopped watching it? Honestly? Well, I confess I have not stopped watching, though I
have stopped writing long posts defending Arjun (Purvi piggybacked on him in my posts, for I never cared much for her preachy, interfering nature).
As for showing this in the US, I am sure it would not survive in this form. But they would rehash it, introduce every possible permutation and combination of deviation, perversion and dysfunctionalism, and would dish it out. I used to watch US serials off and on while out of India on diplomatic assignments. After I retired and settled in India, last year, I watched one called The Guardian - about a young man on probation for drugs, and there was not a single variety of perversion that was not on display there. I am conservative, and so there came a point when I could not take it any more and I quit. Then there was another called Damages, with Glenn Close, in which everyone, but everyone, was betraying and murdering everyone close to him or her, without the least compunction. That was the single most depressing and scary serial I have ever seen, and of course I did not last too long with it either.
In the 1980s, Dynasty, which was enormously popular, had all the characters divorcing and remarrying in a round robin fashion, without ever coming out of that charmed inner circle for their next spouse. I could not understand why they never looked a little farther afield. Dynasty had the ex-wife of Blake Carrington, now married to another oil magnate, endlessly scheming against his current wife. It also had Adam Carrington in the lost and found formula beloved of Hindi films, and the viewers held their breath as he almost had an affair with his sister Fallon, of course not knowing that she was his sister. Almost, but thankfully not ,in the end. And when their (again) lost and found younger sister got married to a European prince the whole wedding party was mowed down by, believe it or not, a most unconvincing bunch of 'terrorists' in a most unconvincing shootout. So, it is all the same stupidities dished out, with more gloss or less.
The best TV channels in the US, to my mind are the likes of PBS , and they draw heavily on the classics, like Jane Austen, Thackeray, Dickens, Conan Doyle, and the less classic like Agatha Christie, and the like. Also US TV has absolutely superb documentaries on any number of subjects -- familiar and esoteric.
In Indian TV, in the old, golden days of Doordarshan, before Zee and Sony and the rest appeared, there were very meaningful serials like Buniyaad, about the aftermath of Partition, and Hum Log. There were Shahrukh's TV outings directed by men now famous as film directors, and genuinely and consistently funny serials (
not like the crude stuff on Comedy Circus these days), like Mr. Yogi, Kaakaji Kahin with Om Puri, Yehi to Hai Zindagi - I can remember so many that I watched whenever I was posted in India. The number of episodes never went beyond 104. Some were of 52 episodes, and most only of 13.
Doordarshan never had to bother about TRPs, and even today, when anything is telecast both on Doordarshan and on a commercial channel, whether it the
Ramayana or
Satyameva Jayate, or now
Saraswatichandra, I always watch it on Doordarshan, which is completely pop-up free. Nowadays, even NatGeo has sideways pop ups covering 1/3 of the screen disfiguring a wonderful documentary on Petra.
Now, PR will cross 1000 episodes! No wonder it is mostly tripe of the worst kind. Plus these days the real focus is on backless blouses, string-tied cholis, the chunky earrings, and the like. I do not think the story line gets anything like as much attention! Of course even in Dynasty, I am sure the gorgeous gowns contributed to the ratings in no small measure.
Even so, PR does not have to have quite so awful a script. I watched only BALH besides PR, and I have now dropped that as well. As of now, I am sticking to Sanjay Leela Bhansali's
Saraswatichandra, DKD Mahadev, and the weekly
Ramayana, besides of course PR. The other three can more than balance out the trash in PR. so I can cope for now.
They say that curiosity kills the cat, but curiosity is, I think, the real reason why I have not stopped watching PR. I keep looking out to see if Purvi will ever cop it for all the damage she has done to the unfortunate men who fell in love with her, and also how it all pans out in the end. I hope it does not take me another 1000 episodes to find that out!😉
Shyamala B.Cowsik
Originally posted by: Mohini19
Okay, so the original post created by ambolove was closed down. Apparently, the reason given was the use of inappropriate language and ideas. Honestly, I really don't want to argue with the moderators because I simply am too confused about the definition of appropriate language and ideas on PR forum.
Anyways, dear members, I am taking the liberty of continuing ambolove's post (I hope ambolove is okay with this). I thought it was a great post. SO, I'm posting what I posted under that thread. I'm guessing that most likely this thread will also be closed.
I'm disgusted to the core with PR's current tracks. More than disgusted, I'm extremely upset. No amount of words are enough to convey how upset I am with the fact that PR is still on air.
And the more screwed up part is that when anyone questions that brainless lady Ekta Kapoor about the regressive nature of her shows, she gets argumentative and counters it by saying, "oh in KSBKBT, Ba was shown learning fashion designing at 70+ age. That is very progressive". Can you ever make this brainless woman understand?
Anyways, what is extremely frustrating is that PR is among the top 10 shows across all channels. How? I don't know.
There is a section of viewers like us who are very upset and find that almost everything is wrong about PR and rightly so. But, apparently, a large section of viewers in India, at least the ones that constitute the TRPs, feed on such nonsense and crap.
I can challenge anyone that if such a show was on air in the US, someone would have sued the production house by now.
As some of you have pointed out, PR represents everything that a DYSFUNCTIONAL, UNETHICAL, AND REGRESSIVE society would stand for.
Edited by sashashyam - 12 years ago