wat kind of mother archana is? - Page 15

Originally posted by: koolsadhu1000

Me too Varsha ...PR bebomes horribly interesting with Slapochana's slaps . She gave TDH such a slap that he ran to America😆 I am very interested in who is her next bakra . 🤣 With Archana weeping in the background of course . I bet she will slapVrsha .😆Varsha opted being the mistress of a Bihari gunda instead of facing Slapochana .😆

Aare…Varsha and Kool…the next bakra is the line is Arjun😉….soon to be halal-ed at the Karanjkar's altar🤣🤣…am so eagerly waiting for that day😆…

Btw…did Mumbai have escalators 18+ yrs ago….or was that another 'time-less error' on the part of our dear CVs😃… besides, why was Archu saying Varsha ran away….surely her Mother's instinct isn't telling her they are alive….for God's sake, Varsha jumped off with a toddler into an water body…how is Archu darling assuming that Varsha had the strength to swim with a child??? 😳

Btw….if the Cvs are so desperate to halal the "Man' Manav on Karanjkar's, why wait??? Why all these sentimental prologues??😆

Originally posted by: Kalapi

Kalapi, hope we both get angels for daughters in law! I like the bit about when your baby does the honors of making you a sasuma! I agree with everything except the last para or is it the last two? About Purvi. She destroyed a file that was needed for a meeting but told Sachin she did it knowing he could easily replace it. Agreed it was wrong but not on the same level as Savita's mistake. Sukriti being a judge should take all aspects of the situation into account before rendering her judgement, just like family court. Very fine line if she overstepped her bounds.
Chalo, let us see what this crazy serial has in store for us tomorrow with the divorce ka chakkar.

Edited by soapwatcher1 - 27 August 2012 at 9:48pm Soapwatcher - Quote.

I am sure we will be a force to reckon with🤣

Anyway, the underlined lines got me thinking. Since I am not a lawyer myself, I started researching (and Janhvi, thanks for you got me researching)😃. Even, it seems forgeries are hard to prove and needs a lot of evidences. Not sure hearsay is enough in the Court of law (as seems that Archu told Purvi etc.). My general take on forgery from the internet is, seems for first time offender (USA?), it is a probation, or a fine (of $100) or both or extended imprisonment of 2 yrs. Even in India, imprisonment seems to be 6 months to 2 yrs and is bail able. So, as such a crime that doesn't dim a life sentence or the guillotine..

Now regarding Purvi's actions, those are offenses no doubt. In the highly regulated Industry I work in (rather not working right now😉, since am busy replying to posts) even easily duplicated reports are not destroyable. There are particular directives on record retentions and destructions and employees are encouraged not to destroy any records...we are trained annually on Government/company policies and regulations...

Besides, destruction of company property knowingly, even those that can be easily reproduced shows a trait in the character that takes matters into her own hands for ultimate personal gains ... and is rather a criminal mischief, right...I find such trait surely not acceptable of a lead (and from a positive character, who should be the epitome of virtue and a role model, right) in making? I find such acts, hard to defend and condemnable...Purvi, has shown these trait repeatedly, taking legal matters on her own hand for personal gains. She unduly influenced the judge, who was responsible for the final verdict. Yes, conflict of interest is also hard to prove (and I do know what I am talking here), but the line is thin and most often blurred and is easily crossed. She directly influenced her, not that she went and talked to a lawyer for the case, but the judge who will be responsible for the final verdict. She, of course, took matters in her own hand and was influencing the system (am not even talking about Sukriti here). Same was with the Union; she was unduly influencing the system for her ultimate personal gains. But we still try to justify her actions and come up with why she did it, instead of condemning it openly...of course, Purvi and Arjun is the 'jodi' so saat khoon maaf, right???? But, didn't Savita, wrong or right, had her own reasons too???

Forgery may be termed as the fraudulent making or alteration of a writing to the prejudice of another man's right. A person commits forgery if he:

1. Makes any false document or any part of it,

2. With an intent to:

i. cause damage or injury to the public or any person,

ii. support any claim or title,

iii. cause any person to part with property

iv. cause any person to enter into express or implied contract,

v. commit any fraud or that the fraud may be committed.

PUNISHMENT

1. Whoever commits forgery shall be punished with imprisonment, which may extend to two years, or with fine or both.

2. Where the forgery is committed with intent to cheat then the punishment shall extend to seven years and will also be liable to fine.

Janhvi...I am truely confused...What Savita did was an intent to separate the couple...it didnot amount to neither physical injury nor the 'know' destruction of Property, that is 'will' according to your post. The divorce if it go thru, would go thru with the standard alimony...no nothing as she knowingly stopped Manav from giving 'alimony", right? So, to me (a layman) the offense is minimal, not as you say a life sentence...besides, the fact, that they lived separately and tried to divorce before, will probably prove that the couple isn't compatible together?? So, at least, the way I see it, it is a fraud (as the trial will be be India) and maybe a 2 yr jail time...

The other question is, with the excellent lawyer that Manav could provide, how easy will it be to prove forgery and even that Sachin was involved...no eyewitnesses, Right??/