/manipulating law

Page

Next Last

Rich`

@cs-07

Dazzler

Posted: 13 years ago

This is the second time and this tme it has proved how purvi and sukriti really messed up with the judiciary system. Corruption even in our veryy own crappy EK shows. 😆

Quote

Frequent Posters

Dabulls23

@Dabulls23

Stunner

+ 2

Posted: 13 years ago

Right on Nirvan

Only thing Purvi knows is to use power incorrectly and illegally...Approaching judge as she is her Aai's friend is unethical not only Purvi's part but definitely on judge Sukriti's part..

I guess they have been reading this forum...CHanged the actor who played Sukriti, who is this time more neutral and spoke truth which should have been told to Purvi the first time she approached her..

It is upto Archana and Manav two grown up people age on 50+ to know what they want out of this marriage...If they have not realized that by 5 1/2 months waiting period than what is few more days will do change that? What will Purvi-Arjun be able to do in stopping this divorce..She needs to also realize and accept that this divorce may come true...SHe is living in her own little lala land..SHe is no kid...She is grown up adult age of 18 and should be able to accept abt Divorce...

Purvi should have been told by Sukriti that she is doing something wrong and illegal-unethical by approaching a professional judge to compromise the case by asking her to do something she would not do for anyone else...As a matter of fact should not do...It is a conflict of interest...But Sukriti has pacified Purvi's this behavior by doing somethings outside of norm and rules.. 😳

Manipulation to the max by purvi in Divorce case and burning that contract in Arjun's company's case...

Like to know where are the so called sanskars right now?

Edited by Dabulls23 - 13 years ago

Quote

Looks like you are new here. Register for free, learn and contribute.

umayal

@LuvSSever

Rocker

Posted: 13 years ago

Nirvan,

There has not been a single entity or arena or area that is showed properly or depicted as it is, for real, in Ekta Ma's shows.

Be it the Judiciary system, the doctors, police ,any professionals, Marital relationship, Husband-Wife pyaar, Mom's love, father's love, Bhai-Behen rishta, a family what it comprises of,whatever it might be, None was for real.

Yet we stick to it. Irony......Had to Blame on Cvs who made it attractive with the initial plot and the actors who still with their hard-work, efforts, tries to convince us seeing it.

Edited by umayal - 13 years ago

Quote

umayal

@LuvSSever

Rocker

Posted: 13 years ago

You stated about this corruption which is true, but even more lame, did you see how Vishnu's case was handled. The police fellows saw it, Vishu has fired two bullets, arjun was shot with the bullets and the girl got kidnapped was there to give the witness, yet on Vishnu's parent's witnesses he would be freed it seems, Ufff...

What BS they are showing...

do his parents witness hold value seriously...

Edited by umayal - 13 years ago

Quote

m_masti

@m_masti

Voyager

Posted: 13 years ago

it is complete wrong by sukruti than purvi...as a person with powers she should not do like this...

i think the only thing Purvi can do in court is, she can ask the signatures to be checked and they are not signed by Archu...

i hope they will not increase the stay, its better if they separate, they have really different priorities in life, it might spoil kids future more by making everyone under one roof...

Edited by m_masti - 13 years ago

Quote

Puneet

@AsYa_fan

Voyager

+ 4

Posted: 13 years ago

In Purvi's defense this divorse isn't a divorse because Archana didn't sign the divorse papers I agree that she agreed to the divorse but she was forsed to agree. So what Purvi is doing is right. She is trying to stop a divorse that isn't a divorse

Quote

sherma

@sherma

Rocker

+ 2

Posted: 13 years ago

Originally posted by: Arvi_fan
In Purvi's defense this divorse isn't a divorse because Archana didn't sign the divorse papers I agree that she agreed to the divorse but she was forsed to agree. So what Purvi is doing is right. She is trying to stop a divorse that isn't a divorse

exactly stop it in a proper way,claim it to b a froud signature or tell manav abt the condition sachin has put,

i tink damodar,vandu,sulo,purvi whoclaims to be armaan fan and want them together,but inreality are very happy with the divorce

Quote

koolsadhu1000

@koolsadhu1000

Stunner

+ 3

Posted: 13 years ago

I have not seen the serial but I want to give my comments on this Sukriti's character ever since being shown as a judge .

She should be exposed . She makes court rulings on the basis of personal friendships and biases . She should be exposed in such a way that she should never be allowed to wear that black robe of a judge again .

If Sachin should be disbarred for sanctioning forged signatures by Savita , so should Sukriti for giving preference to Archana in this case and disrupting Manav's settled life in Canada by not even considering that his daughters go to university there and that Archana has not even seen them in 18 years . [ Of course the fact that one daughter who went to a well established university in Canada later drove a taxi in India blessed by her mother who simply LOVES poverty is not technically Sukriti's fault . It is Teju's own decision . And Archana's blessing with sanskaari guidance . Or misguiding an 18 year old ...i dunno .]

Soham is also a criminal . Infact he is a full fledged criminal . Yet CVs show sympathy towards his portrayal ...if Sachin has done one act by using his knowledge of law to keep quiet about forged signatures Soham has gone one step further and even done real crimes to please the don Balan .

I don't understand the CVs . Everyone who has a full right to be angry with Archana is shown as a criminal .😆😆 For example Sachu , Soham and Savita . They do one criminal activity or the other . Of course i understand their purpose ...Archana is gonna change everyone's hearts by laying terrific guilt complexes on them . Oh dear, I am contradicting myself .😆😆

Coming back to Sukriti . I insist she is exposed .😆 She was the one who convinced Archana that husbands ' change ' after becoming rich and that poverty is bliss . The next we see of her is that she has become a judge and uptill now she has done all rulings in Archana's favour instead of reprimanding her in chambers for not even bothering about her daughters who grew up motherless inspite of having a mother .

I hope someone catches her red handed listening to Purvi and disrobes her just as corrupt priests are defrocked by the higher clergy .

Edited by koolsadhu1000 - 13 years ago

Quote

Kalapi

@Kalapi

Dazzler

Posted: 13 years ago

True what Masti said that it is more wrong on Sukruti's part than that of Purvi. But, Purvi did personally influence the judge. She actually has been shown to even go on Union Strike when Archana employment was terminated. She did burn the company documents for personal gains….I guess 'the brand' of Kiranjikar or eh…Sanskaar according to our CVs😲…I haven't watched yet today's episode, She and Arjun again wanted to influence the judge for personal gains…to me both Archana and Manav have very different set of priorities (as already pointed out by someone) why forced them to live together, in fact as couple Arman has lived separately more than together…can really, one expect someone after 18 yrs of separation to start living together as nothing has happened in the world😲…Arman, actually to me is better separated than being together …besides the Purvi/Arjun/Ovi mess will only create more tensions if they start living together...unless of Course, Manav gives up Ovi for good😲😳

Quote

Dabulls23

@Dabulls23

Stunner

+ 2

Posted: 13 years ago

#10

Originally posted by: Arvi_fan
In Purvi's defense this divorse isn't a divorse because Archana didn't sign the divorse papers I agree that she agreed to the divorse but she was forsed to agree. So what Purvi is doing is right. She is trying to stop a divorse that isn't a divorse

The right way for Purvi to fight for her mother Archana is to tell the judge in court to varify signature on divorce papers...not by going behind the door to ask judge to do her any favors...she makes it look illegal when she does not need to do so...

Quote

1 2 3 4 5

/manipulating law

Related Topics

Explore Topics