/manipulating law - Page 2

Originally posted by: koolsadhu1000

I have not seen the serial but I want to give my comments on this Sukriti's character ever since being shown as a judge .

She should be exposed . She makes court rulings on the basis of personal friendships and biases . She should be exposed in such a way that she should never be allowed to wear that black robe of a judge again .

If Sachin should be disbarred for sanctioning forged signatures by Savita , so should Sukriti for giving preference to Archana in this case and disrupting Manav's settled life in Canada by not even considering that his daughters go to university there and that Archana has not even seen them in 18 years . [ Of course the fact that one daughter who went to a well established university in Canada later drove a taxi in India blessed by her mother who simply LOVES poverty is not technically Sukriti's fault . It is Teju's own decision . And Archana's blessing with sanskaari guidance . Or misguiding an 18 year old ...i dunno .]

Soham is also a criminal . Infact he is a full fledged criminal . Yet CVs show sympathy towards his portrayal ...if Sachin has done one act by using his knowledge of law to keep quiet about forged signatures Soham has gone one step further and even done real crimes to please the don Balan .

I don't understand the CVs . Everyone who has a full right to be angry with Archana is shown as a criminal .😆😆 For example Sachu , Soham and Savita . They do one criminal activity or the other . Of course i understand their purpose ...Archana is gonna change everyone's hearts by laying terrific guilt complexes on them . Oh dear, I am contradicting myself .😆😆

Coming back to Sukriti . I insist she is exposed .😆 She was the one who convinced Archana that husbands ' change ' after becoming rich and that poverty is bliss . The next we see of her is that she has become a judge and uptill now she has done all rulings in Archana's favour instead of reprimanding her in chambersfor not even bothering about her daughters who grew up motherless inspite of having a mother .

I hope someone catches her red handed listening to Purvi and disrobes her just as corrupt priests are defrocked by the higher clergy .

all the characters are forced to do wrongs/mistakes/crimes to cover archu's sanskars and to make archu mahan...
archu never takes any initiative to make people who hate her think good about her...but she always takes initiative to create the situation so that people who hate her make wrong/mistake/crime...
Archu always took initiative to make people do wrong by her actions
1. Savita made wrongs because of archu's never ending concern about K's
2. Varsha made crime by getting addicted to soham, and the addiction was initiated by archu
3. archu gave sachu a signal that 'soham is only her eklauta son'
4. archu's concern/giving everything to purvi so that Ovi can make mistakes

Originally posted by: koolsadhu1000

She should be exposed . She makes court rulings on the basis of personal friendships and biases . She should be exposed in such a way that she should never be allowed to wear that black robe of a judge again .

If Sachin should be disbarred for sanctioning forged signatures by Savita , so should Sukriti for giving preference to Archana in this case and disrupting Manav's settled life in Canada by not even considering that his daughters go to university there and that Archana has not even seen them in 18 years . [ Of course the fact that one daughter who went to a well established university in Canada later drove a taxi in India blessed by her mother who simply LOVES poverty is not technically Sukriti's fault . It is Teju's own decision . And Archana's blessing with sanskaari guidance . Or misguiding an 18 year old ...i dunno .]

Uprooting a family who has been living their lives in another country to bring them back for 6 months so the couple are forced to live together in India is nonsense...Especially when the couple has lived seperately by choice for past freaking 18 yrs...No need for official divorce...Darn divorce has happened already yaar in my eyes...Intent is there..😆

I don't understand the CVs . Everyone who has a full right to be angry with Archana is shown as a criminal .😆😆 For example Sachu , Soham and Savita . They do one criminal activity or the other . Of course i understand their purpose ...Archana is gonna change everyone's hearts by laying terrific guilt complexes on them . Oh dear, I am contradicting myself .😆😆

Thats the power of Sanskars 😉 Song came to mind "ITs the power of love' 😆

Coming back to Sukriti . I insist she is exposed .😆 She was the one who convinced Archana that husbands ' change ' after becoming rich and that poverty is bliss . The next we see of her is that she has become a judge and uptill now she has done all rulings in Archana's favour instead of reprimanding her in chambers for not even bothering about her daughters who grew up motherless inspite of having a mother .

I hope someone catches her red handed listening to Purvi and disrobes her just as corrupt priests are defrocked by the higher clergy .

Originally posted by: Dabulls23

The right way for Purvi to fight for her mother Archana is to tell the judge in court to varify signature on divorce papers...not by going behind the door to ask judge to do her any favors...she makes it look illegal when she does not need to do so...

Well I dont think shes doing something illegal. Shes just helping her mom and plus she doesn't have hard proof that the signatures on the divorse papers aren't hers.

Well, Sachu, being a lawyer, also passed forgery and blackmailed Archana. Nonetheless, Purvi's actions are wrong, but she has every right to fight fire with fire.

Originally posted by: Dabulls23

Right on Nirvan

Only thing Purvi knows is to use power incorrectly and illegally...Approaching judge as she is her Aai's friend is unethical not only Purvi's part but definitely on judge Sukriti's part..

I guess they have been reading this forum...CHanged the actor who played Sukriti, who is this time more neutral and spoke truth which should have been told to Purvi the first time she approached her..

It is upto Archana and Manav two grown up people age on 50+ to know what they want out of this marriage...If they have not realized that by 5 1/2 months waiting period than what is few more days will do change that? What will Purvi-Arjun be able to do in stopping this divorce..She needs to also realize and accept that this divorce may come true...SHe is living in her own little lala land..SHe is no kid...She is grown up adult age of 18 and should be able to accept abt Divorce...

Purvi should have been told by Sukriti that she is doing something wrong and illegal-unethical by approaching a professional judge to compromise the case by asking her to do something she would not do for anyone else...As a matter of fact should not do...It is a conflict of interest...But Sukriti has pacified Purvi's this behavior by doing somethings outside of norm and rules.. 😳

Manipulation to the max by purvi in Divorce case and burning that contract in Arjun's company's case...

Like to know where are the so called sanskars right now?

Varsha di, this happens when the good is glorified so much that everything becomes good even if its SO Bad. i mean ofcourse it is for arman's BHALAI, but excuse me, like sachin, isnt purvi treating two 50+ adults like children. she is not in control of their lives.
Archana had ample opportunities,
- to tell the truth
- to expose savita and sachin
- OR to go back to the family without breaking the family when manav confessed that he still loevs her dearly. she is the one who wants to be God for sachin that she is torturing three people in return for Sachin's Shravani wish, more than sachin being a moron, it is archana being the super moron.

Originally posted by: Arvi_fan

In Purvi's defense this divorse isn't a divorse because Archana didn't sign the divorse papers I agree that she agreed to the divorse but she was forsed to agree. So what Purvi is doing is right. She is trying to stop a divorse that isn't a divorse

that wud have quashed the divorce right in the beginning and all wud be okay but archana did accept she wants divorce and that she signed the papers and she wants money and her children back. was the shoot done at marine drive???

Kools that so never going to happen!!
Commentary please 😭

Originally posted by: nalonynnej

Well, Sachu, being a lawyer, also passed forgery and blackmailed Archana. Nonetheless, Purvi's actions are wrong, but she has every right to fight fire with fire.

Sure she can disclose Savita's truth, but she's under her dearest aai's indestructible oath. 😆 Plus at this point in the trial, who would believe her without circumstantial evidence?

but two wrongs dont make a right and purvi is actually insulting two grownups by maniplating her way through. the best would have been telling the truth but these tactics are illegal and idiotic in my POV/

Originally posted by: nirvanlove

but two wrongs dont make a right and purvi is actually insulting two grownups by maniplating her way through. the best would have been telling the truth but these tactics are illegal and idiotic in my POV/

Originally posted by: nalonynnej

Ideally, Archana wouldn't succumb to her son's request in the first place, but it is a daily soap, toh drama banta hain. 😆

lol agreed