Just like Varsha doesn't think she should justify her views, and the mods said the same thing, I will not justify anything to you.
I will be happy to discuss my views with you, but you must learn to express yourself in a respectful manner. What you dish out is what you will receive. If you are harsh and disrespectful in your tone when posting, people will be harsh to you in return.For your information, Archana refused to give Ajit money on one occasion only, after she found out he didn't want it to open a business (as he lied to Vandu about). He only wanted the money to "get back at Manav". Archana found this out and was looking after Manav's interest. I'm sure you wouldn't want Manav to lose money in this way, and for anyone to take advantage of him.If Archana, after finding out Ajit was trying to cheat Manav out of money, had remained quiet and allowed Ajit to get the money, you would be one of many who would have chastised her for saying or doing nothing, and for allowing Manav to be fleeced.You can't eat your cake and have it!In addition, if Manav or Archana gave Vandu money, there's no guarantee she or the family would benefit from it. Remember after the leap when Vandu was working and Ajit wasn't and he was always drunk, Vandu would hide money in the wardrobe for their daughter's school fees and to pay bills.When Ajit found this money, he took it and used it to drink and probably gamble, after beating up Vandu. So, giving Vandu money wouldn't help her most of the time. Also, if Manav and Archana paid bills for Vandu or bought groceries for her, Rasika and Ajit would confront her about where she got the money to do all these things, so you see, blaming Archana alone won't help the situation. Even if Manav alone gave Vandu money, there's no guarantee her life would be easier as a result.