enough of hatred

Page

Next Last

-SD-

@-SD-

Voyager

Posted: 13 years ago

one thing I find very funny in all these hate discussions these days, which reminds me how BJP and Congress fight in news channel shows.

for example:

BJP blames Congress for the 1984 sikh killing (congress ministers led mob of congress workers and they killed/raped thousand of sikhs in Delhi). So tell me what should congress answer? they should tell no we didn't to do that, someone else did etc etc..but do u know what they tell. they tell BJP who the hell u r to tell us that we killed sikhs, u killed muslims in gujrat. Even when BJP tells about corruption, congress is used to remind them about the Gujrat riot. What I mean to say they are politicians and they look good while fighting like that. at least we are not politicians.

so when someone says "Savita is bad", people who oppose should tell the goodness of Savita and also they should accept that savita is bad (because she has done and has been doing many evil deeds which are unforgivable). what is the point in raising Sulochana issue (even i admit Sulochana is bad. u may check my posts in 2009/10, i created a thread Hate sulochana). If you have to talk of Sulochana'sbadness, to prove Savita is good, it means you are just like politicians who talk of any damn thing and prove they are right. Can't you just prove Savita is good without referring Sulo?Moreover, why can't we accept savita's evil characters at all? Why are we getting personal?

same thing I would like to tell for the savita haters also.

Even i went through posts, where people tried to prove Manju is good. I understand Archana has done some blunders, we need to hate her etc etc..but does that mean we would say Manju is good...come on..Give me a break !! 😆 she had instrumental roles in almost every manmade calamity that has happened to the K and D family. So just going to any extent to prove your point is something that suits poloticians. Similarly, someone suggested urination over Savita's face. isn't that very humiliating?

I request stop the hatred. spread love and humour. that is what we are here in IF for.

Quote

Frequent Posters

Tanyaz

@Tanyaz

Trailblazer

+ 5

Posted: 13 years ago

Great post SD. I am pressing like button but it's not working , as usual ...

Quote

Looks like you are new here. Register for free, learn and contribute.

Lumos

@Lumos

Rocker

Posted: 13 years ago

Very maturely and sensibly put...😊

Quote

archanamanav

@archanamanav

Rocker

Posted: 13 years ago

this is good one..like button not working han..
yes give me a break too from majusha praising🤣

Quote

448368

Suspended

Posted: 13 years ago

"I request stop the hatred. spread love and humour. that is what we are here in IF for." 👏 🤗

SD m with u on this, finally a sensible thread on this forum after a long time, kudos my friend for bringing it up ...

Quote

Jia

@gremlin.

Rocker

+ 2

Posted: 13 years ago

Awesomesauce!!! Love it, especially this part!

spread love and humour.

In fact, I am just gonna go and follow it!

EDIT: There, you can see my love all over the first page now! 🤣

Edited by gremlin. - 13 years ago

Quote

suan

@suan

Rocker

+ 3

Posted: 13 years ago

Sd,

Fantastic and timely post. Hope many members read it and see the wisdom of your advice and follow it as well. We surely need it on the forum at this time! 👍🏼

Quote

LovePRSoham

@LovePRSoham

Rocker

Posted: 13 years ago

Aww SD thanks for this thread.. Much needed at this time... 👍🏼

I see Jia is already doing it 😆 Great Jia Pyaar baant the chalo 👏

She knows how to deal with it 😉 Nice Siggies Jia... 😆

Quote

576259

Suspended

Posted: 13 years ago

Originally posted by: -SD-

one thing I find very funny in all these hate discussions these days, which reminds me how BJP and Congress fight in news channel shows.
for example:

BJP blames Congress for the 1984 sikh killing (congress ministers led mob of congress workers and they killed/raped thousand of sikhs in Delhi). So tell me what should congress answer? they should tell no we didn't to do that, someone else did etc etc..but do u know what they tell. they tell BJP who the hell u r to tell us that we killed sikhs, u killed muslims in gujrat. Even when BJP tells about corruption, congress is used to remind them about the Gujrat riot. What I mean to say they are politicians and they look good while fighting like that. at least we are not politicians.

so when someone says "Savita is bad", people who oppose should tell the goodness of Savita and also they should accept that savita is bad (because she has done and has been doing many evil deeds which are unforgivable). what is the point in raising Sulochana issue (even i admit Sulochana is bad. u may check my posts in 2009/10, i created a thread Hate sulochana). If you have to talk of Sulochana'sbadness, to prove Savita is good, it means you are just like politicians who talk of any damn thing and prove they are right. Can't you just prove Savita is good without referring Sulo?Moreover, why can't we accept savita's evil characters at all? Why are we getting personal?

same thing I would like to tell for the savita haters also.

Even i went through posts, where people tried to prove Manju is good. I understand Archana has done some blunders, we need to hate her etc etc..but does that mean we would say Manju is good...come on..Give me a break !! 😆 she had instrumental roles in almost every manmade calamity that has happened to the K and D family. So just going to any extent to prove your point is something that suits poloticians. Similarly, someone suggested urination over Savita's face. isn't that very humiliating?

I request stop the hatred. spread love and humour. that is what we are here in IF for.

i somewhere felt that the post was directed at me & like thinkers

give me a break dude ... wen did i even say that manju is "GOOD" ... i had said manju is "BETTER"

suppose a person has killed 1 person & other person has killed 10 ... both r BAD ... none of them is GOOD ... but still first person can be said BETTER than the second

i hope i have made myself clear

& ur point of bringing sulo during savita's bashing ... well bringing 1 character for unnecessarily covering other has been happening from long back

lemme give u eg ... archana had clearly told satish that u just look after my sister & not after anybody else ( UR MOM) in the world ... satish followed her orders blindly ... instead of setting varsha straight , he always forced bhavana to accept varsha ... he always forcibly pushed varsha down bhavana's throat ... everybody on forum was supporting satish

then during soham's case suddenly everybody realised that y satish didnt stop varsha on time ... they had 4gotten that he was still following archana's orders ... suddenly hatred for satish started

1 member went upto the level of saying that satish shud badly suffer to which bunch of others joined her ... just to save archana from hatred , that member found it convenient to divert the hatred towards poor innocent satish

such things were always prevalent over here , wats new about it

@ green

now who is going to decide which extent is extreme over here ... & by that lines u r trying to suppress views ...

for eg a particular sound can be music for 1 person & noise for other ... it is subjective & ones own perspective ... so i dont think anybody has right to say that other people r crossing extents ... even they can say when u blindly support ur favourite

Edited by prasad1991 - 13 years ago

Quote

-SD-

@-SD-

Voyager

Posted: 13 years ago

#10

Dear Prasad,

If I go on arguing with you over Manju matter (whether she is better or good or worst or little bad), again we will end up with a quarrel. you would go on saying she may be bad daughter in law,but a good wife. Then I will remind you that she is not a good wife as she took Vinod to mahila samiti once. She takes Rasika's evil advices for her girihasthi. Right?

Yes I have referred to your post, where u tried to prove Manju is way better than Archana. But that does not mean I am a Archu/Sulochana supporter. I don't know whether you were there in IF during the first Arman break up, but I blamed Archu-Sulo duo for that. If you go through few posts by me, everywhere I tried to make fun of Sulo's deeds. Rather you may say, whenever I try to create humour, I do it at Sulo's expense. Yes I hate her, because she interferes in others' lives. Only thinks of Archana. never cared for varsha and vaishali. She should have stayed with Varhsa, when she was mentally sick. The list will be very long.

But that does not mean savita has done wonderful things. Why was she so serious when she saw FDs in Archana's names? What was the big deal if an obedient son like Manav saves some money in his wife' name? Did Archu ever misbehave her even after she humiliated her many times and even called her badchalan etc? Having said this I don't want to sound like an Archana supporter as well. You might have gone through a post of mine, where I made fun of Archu saying that she wants to distribute her daughters among neighbors those don't have girl child.

As you say, this hatred is not new in this forum. But does that mean we should continue like that only??

Quote

1 2 3

enough of hatred

Related Topics

Explore Topics