🏏Th.2 ~ ICC Men's T20 World Cup 2026: Final IND vs NZ🏏
JILLAT KI LADDU 9.3
DADI IS SICK 8.3
Anupamaa 08 Mar 2026 Written Update & Daily Discussions Thread
Dhakke Maarke Nikaalna Part 2
Kareena defends Deepika’s 8 hour work hours request
Originally posted by: koolsadhu1000
Its so stupid , the only dialogue to show Varsha's great maternal instincts is her knowledge that the child ONLY drinks chocolate milk which is btw quite UNHEALTHY habit to encourage on DAILY basis . 3 year olds eat solid food , veggies , dal rice , khichadi , everything . NOTHING is given to Soham . Only milk and THAT TOO Archana cannot do and needs VARSHA for THAT . And the baby cries cries and cries , naturally , he must be having worms or something by guzzling all that sugar .
Originally posted by: koolsadhu1000
Its so stupid , the only dialogue to show Varsha's great maternal instincts is her knowledge that the child ONLY drinks chocolate milk which is btw quite UNHEALTHY habit to encourage on DAILY basis . 3 year olds eat solid food , veggies , dal rice , khichadi , everything . NOTHING is given to Soham . Only milk and THAT TOO Archana cannot do and needs VARSHA for THAT . And the baby cries cries and cries , naturally , he must be having worms or something by guzzling all that sugar .
Instead of choosing a easy possible way or the sensible one ,ARMAN choose the mahaan decision just that these Cvs want to justify soham's donation 😡.
Arrey both would have had a talk or fight with each other to get through each point to the other. whats there in deciding to give soham to varsha ..Ufff...
Manav as he has started , because he started well, saying you were doing this all along now what happened, your mother can take care 4 ,what about 2, I didnt say you dont love him or that you do it intentionally, knowing or unknowingly it is happening, sachu is driven into that state ,even after I warning you about this and asked to take care of it, you are going careless.
This is what he started.
He could have lashed at her for ending in this state and when she accepts for soham donation, he along with the sarcasm would have scolded her that I was asking the reason for this mess and the solution but you are accepting for a greater mess by accepting to what I said sarcastically.
He could have fight with her to get through his point, instead he fell for savita's words and took that horrible decision that makes him dead.
Same goes for archu too. If she cares for soham and want soham with him, she could have talked back to manav that manav you are wrong in your statement and the decision,
My point was not that, I am telling you sachu is behaving weird , we need to handle him properly, dont know who spoils his brain and ears with strange things , so I was asking you a solution for it but where were you taking the issue to.
She could have fight with him, you misunderstood my things, I was to keep both my sons happy and take care of them properly but these days some thing happening that going out of control. so I thought you would help me in this but you are blaming.
Like this if they have fight with each other also and atleast tell each other POV and finally understand both want both of their two children to do good and ways for it has to be found out and implemented, then that would had been fine.
But archu too readily accepts for varsha sake.
what she said to sulo, if manav wants I will give, what is this. if you dont want to give your son, fight with your husband, tell his interpretation and the decision was wrong. Accepting for majboori and all is BS. Tell him I dont want to give soham and I love sachu more too. Some things were gone wrong, we both need to straight it up. But thats not she said.
she too wants it in her inner mind. she too thinks ,yes varsha need soham and if soham is not there sachu can be taken care of well. so she accepted manav's decision.
So both these characters irritate me a lot from yesterday and I dont know why I am still writing things about them, this could had been but they are at fault, like this Like this .😕 .
To hell with them.
Originally posted by: Dabulls23
Bhalla I came to US very young age of 21 with a small 3 mo young baby and had another one in 18 mo..From 1975 I have always worked until 2004..Managed house, kids, my job, supported hubster in his post grad studies by handling kids 4 nights a week all by myself with no support system...And doing all that while being poor..😳Archana has no reason to complain..As I wrote yesterday to mandy that just because Soham cries does not mean she needs to jump each time..Its ok for babies or lil ones to cry sometimes...Helps their lungs in growing 😃 healthy..Most women work outside and inside of their house...May be Manav should start helping out a bit..Nothing wrong in that...Both Savita-Sulo can take turn in helping with kids while Archu coooks etc..
Originally posted by: koolsadhu1000
Kool Di, if they show Archana as very caring than why should she not be able to take care of two kids? There are mothers who can take care of triplets as babies even four babies. What is this if I have Soham I can't take care of Sachu? Archana is not to be regarded as innocent, taking care of two kids is nothing compared to taking care of five or ten. And on top of that, she complained when she said she has to take care of two kids, I loved how Manav reprimanded her for that, why even give birth to a child if you will have diffculty in taking care of two children?
bhalla we all r women in foreign countries , looking after 3 or 2 kids ALONE while hubbies do travelling jobs etc , minus ANY facilities like servants , Grandmas etc like India . . Babysitting is costly here so we roam around with babies like Mother Apes , a one woman show , the babies CONSTANTLY on our head . Archana has two Grandmas who DO help out from time to time , A servant , an entire Chawl full of helpful neighnours who volunteer to baby sit Soham etc . She is bloody LUCKY . Even if THIS she cannot manage , its SHAMEFUL . Manav asked Sulo correctly ...HOW YOU managed 4 kids , teach ur daughter !
Originally posted by: koolsadhu1000
Even if Manav were doing this to test Archana he knows very well she would have gone along with what he said, she always does. Manav made his choice first
Fail to see how this excuses Archana . Do u mean to say the one who made the statement FIRST is the one to blame and the one ho agreed to it immediately is NOT?Its like saying the one who lifted the murder weapon to hit is the criminal while the one who aided and abetted him by simply holding his hand is not .And if it comes to that , it was Archana who always gave away Soham to Varsha FIRST uptill now in this whole series ! But its not the FIRST thing thats at issue here anymore , its a JOINT DECISION today ! Not once has she tried to stop Manav infact she told him Due to Soham I cannot concentrate on Sachu ! What kind of a stupid excuse is that to agree to ur husband for giving up the baby away ! Admitting to inefficiency and agreeing immediately to giving babies away , so much so that even the husband notices that and comments sarcastically !And honestly what was she looking so SHOCKED about when Satish suggested Legal adoption so Varsha does not bother him when question of giving baby away AGAIN arises ? Was she seriously expecting to happily turn up on the steps with Mamta Card in some weeks ? Archana has done EXACTLY this for last three years ...she spoilt her sister rotten by encouraging her addiction to her baby and is nOw telling Manav SHAMELESSLY that Oh II cud pay more attention to Sachu before this coz Varsha looked after Soham ! What kind of an answer was THAT !!!Manav needs a tight slap but Archana needs an equally tight one .