Mistreatment of parents is wrong - Page 6

wow!!!

Originally posted by: koolsadhu1000

I am reserving my comments coz I wanna watch the full episode [ after many days I will watch ]

But Varsha I TOTALLY AGREE with every WORD

Now only one thing is remaining . Rasika telling Sulo That VINOD IS NOW HER BETA

And yea , a scene where Sulo wants to talk to Vinod but is forced to go through RASIKA to get to him

Lets see how THAT feels .

Inspite of being a MOTHER , Sulo broke ethics of motherhood and told another woman Your Beta is now MY beta and I refuse to give address.

THIS IS RETRIBUTION . Let her understand how HELPLESS a woman feels when her child ...her son ...is totally in the hands of a younger woman who walked in his life just some days back and that girl's family starts taking over and dictating to her about HER SON .

Hi Kool Di,

Exactly my words👏 Rasika shud go to Sulo and say Vinod is my son now, and you have no right to know where he is or even meet him. Sulo insulted savita terribly, and I think she should get the same thing back at her. But I doubt Rasika would ever be that nice to Vinod, she won't ever treat Vinod like her son.

Savita LOST her son due to Karanjkars. And Sulo has always protected the person who insulted Deshmukhs. The same will come back at her now

Originally posted by: tiya229

wow!!!

i came here after a long time, so forgive me, if i say something wrong:

the way i see it: Savita DESERVED Arman's separation and Manav's "tough love" as she is "evil and wrong"..

but sulochana doesnt DESERVE anything as she is "nice"???

uh-uh... nope.

the way i see it: to support a wrong person, is WRONG. To forgive manju was sulochana's choice. to protect her was sulochana's choice. then she must also, be prepared to suffer the consquences. when karma comes and bites, it doesnt see archu's mom, or savita... it simply happens...

on the flip side, archana was dumped on savita by everyone around her, when she rebelled, she was lablled the BAD mom, and DESERVED manav's separation and that HOW can a MANAV not support his beautiful, lovely, supportive wife??? and the question was "isnt savita responsible for the mess, as she took archana's jewels?"

then now,i say: how can VINOD not support his wife??? afterall she is the SOLE earner of their family! and sulochana is reponsible for this mess. maybe, if she didnt support manju so much, and didnt protect her, maybe things would have been different...

by ignoring whats under your nose, you arent mahan or nice, just a good ol'fool... sulochana chose to ignore the signs that were UNDER her nose, she must suffer the consquences...

and also, this is NOT a question of mother's love vs son's love. it is more of a choice: should i ignore my bahu's mistakes, or stand up for myslef and protect my self. sulo chose to do the former, much like many senior indians of the cliche old generation...

i think, this should be a lesson to older generation watching: LOVE but not blindly.

PS: i dont watch the show anymore, just logged on here, and saw some posts and the hypocrisy bothered me.

Completely agree tiya👍🏼

Originally posted by: Tanyaz

What happened to Sulochan was very sad ...She should have never signed papers without looking ...She should know Manju by now ..Both Archana and Sulochna are so naive at tiems ...

I am very interested to see what will happen in this track now ..I hope the CVs habndle it well...About time Manju and Vinod get punished for their deeds ...

Completely agree Di, Sulo was very foolish to sign the papers. She should know what Manju can do but she is Manju's biggest support.

when karma comes and bites, it doesnt see archu's mom, or savita... it simply happens...

Seeing Sulochana being treated worse than a maid, I can tolerate, I can say that it is karma for Sulochana tolerating everything Manju has done to her family but I cannot support Vinod and Manju tricking Sulochana into signing papers and kicking her out of her home. That is just wrong! I don't care what a parent has done, to do this to them in their old age there is just no excuse.

y are relations defined only with respect to archana ... only her mother is mother ... & other's mothers r not mothers

Originally posted by: prasad1991

y are relations defined only with respect to archana ... only her mother is mother ... & other's mothers r not mothers

& all those who are saying that savita chose to be away from manav ... its totally wrong ... shravani had given many chances to armaan ... savita was pleading in front of them for not geting separated ... that time archana got separated on her own wish ... she just messed up everything

Oh no prasad, Sulo is not the only mother in PR, and yes Savita did not choose to be away from Manav. That was Sulo who separated a mother from a son and now she will be getting her karma.

I also hope Rasika shields Vinod as Sulo shielded Manav from his own mother.