Kool's Commentary : March 16 - Page 2

Kools I have given up watching this show a long time ago when both of them took the idiotic decision of divorce.. I just read your commentary and Tanya's update to keep up. Inspite of Savita showing him the bitter truth I am 100% sure Manav will still not get it. It has to be Archana always to tell him what to do.. oh man what a waste.

Originally posted by: Tanyaz

Manav shoould use his brains and use baby sachu ... he should tell his mother that I am calling Shravani to take the baby back as you are not well....Or else let me come back with my wife ...One thing is for sure , savita cannot be left in this house alone with the baby ... it is very unsafe for the child ..

Originally posted by: Dabulls23

Right on sistah...That is what I meant..Actually I feel sorry for Savita and ULM both...They should now really make their relationship strong outside of Archu's involvement...Than I will feel CVs did right by them...

Pavitra Archana was not so Pavitra when she was doing MFs with ULM while she was engaged to TDH and he was engaged to shrav...

Hypocracy to the max..

Few have brought up good points abt Why Ks or JPBP Sulo has not come to check on Savita knowing the fact she is illl...Savita went to see her...There are social protocols one must follow with their Samdhis to remain in society..Not sure where Sulo's sanskars went with this? Should she not advicing her daughter and SIL that deal with your Ds issue right now and forget abt getting involved in Vaishu or Madhuri's problems?

Sulo's sanskar's have flown to the US with her richest Damad.

Originally posted by: lovely

I agree Sachu is very unsafe right now.. But see giving an ultimatum of taking away Sachu from her again will definately kill Savita. That is not a good option. He would be stupid enough according to me if he does that.

i agree its not a good idea, d cvs will kill manav character if he does that,and manav is not evn bthered about sachin,y will he care he is not his son.ans savita telling him to choose between savita and archu is not wriong,manav brought this thing in savitas mind.today also he was mre concerned about archu then savita,wen his father who has never called manav hme for petty issues told him to come home urgently. manav still dint get the point

Some of the interpretations on Savita's anger have beaten me dumb. The stretched logic so amazing, it makes me wonder whether it's ok to point out the anomaly. Especially when so many perceptive readers are seemingly agreeing to it wholeheartedly- I must be missing… and ennui. For a change I'll speak …

A.) 'Savita's anger because of divorce'- Of all people who has the least right or reason to give vent to a righteous and disapproving rage, it's her. Divorce was acted upon to secure Sachin (rightly or wrongly). The divorcees were deeply in love and not irreparably acrimonious. And see the effect. Sachin was born in Savita's household, not lost to her and ultimately she had that ample chance to raid and rob his departing mother. For Savita everything had boiled down to Sachin- at any cost, as clearly seen at time of Shravni's release on Manav. She no longer cared whether Shravni stays or goes; only Sachin must stay…Now we apply righteousness borne out of her briefly just support for Armaan or her forbiddance to divorce. Why, then on what premise her present anger is rooted? The divorce got nullified and her just wish prevailed- where is the need to go angry now? (But even Cvs' have forgotten this angle perhaps).

B.) Anger due to Second Jailing- Again unconvincing logic. She would be righteously angry on Dharmesh-Jaywant, or even Karanjikars (their twin faults- 'relationship' or at worse 'inaction', though faults untenable for a 'righteous' anger)…But Archana should be the person she ought to be thankful to. It was she, who, with complete indifference to personal ruin had actually secured Manav's freedom and stood by them fast, actually earning the wrath of her entire clan. How could be she get angry on her on this point rather then thankful? Goes over me.

These and Savita's earlier complete acceptance of that 'baggage' (for Sachin's death) makes whole 'Angry Aai on a baggage' track moot...Stretched artificiality for the sake of stretching only, as is their wont. Or on alternative, to cash well on Usha Nadkarni's versatility in portraying varying shades of a senior character…Better they wrap up this dubious track and show her happy and reconciled.

This is only a tale related perspective.

ULM went from taking faltoo zimmedari of unwed prego shrav and sachu by taking upon himself to marry her by divorcing his wife to zimmedari of K family...

Originally posted by: Tanyaz

feeling sad after the show ..Don't even feel like commenting ...

Husband called ...Curfew in Bahrain ....but hopefully things will be in control now ...

hope all is well tanya.heard abt it too.

really disappointed with the CVs, is choosing betn mother and wife the only option Manav has ? why cant there be an amicable solution to this mess where all parties are happy ....... why choose one over other ? Savita may have said this in her illness and depression but she always wanted this to happen, She has to realise this for once an all that Manav married Archana and they are husband and wife now it's wrong to separate them, by doing this she may get Manav back but will never get his love or respect, she'll only have him physically by her side but will never be able to connect with him emotionally.

Manav should forcefully take control now .Don't let his mother manipulate him any more ....

Awesomly put Kools!..Very very true: