Originally posted by: koolsadhu1000
Not wanting a dime from Dharmu is Fine . Its a choice after all . But This also means Dharmu goes SCOT FREE .
Has India gone THAT ahead ?Debatable . In PR it hasnt . People stand on roads and gossip about jeeoo saali affairs is the picture and I am merely pointing out PR STANDARDS . On a real life basis its perfectly possible to live alone with self respect but Vaishali and her sisters LACK sense .
I am merely stating reality . Ultimately EVERYTHING boils down to FINANCES only .U cannot show self respect on EMPTY STOMACH .Vaishalis parents r retired and not being dependent on Dharmesh means depending on MANJU . Vinod has no job . If Manju kicks out she has to live at MANAVS expense .And we all saw WHERE THAT LED TO . Has SELF RELIANT Vaishali ever done a job ?
Nope . Now toh she is PREGGY . Timing to find job by roaming on roads kinda sucks . The ONLY women WORKING in PR who cann AFFORD to show SELF RELIANCE and SELF RESPECT are MANJU and VARSHA .
.
It is not just about Vaishali's choice. The reason some of us want Dharmu to be stripped out of the last penny is because we want atleast punishment from that angle. More so, bcos he is a lucky b*****d who goes scot-free every time!
It is not a question of how we would react if we were in place of Vaishali. Vaishali is a fictional character and so is Dharmesh. Whether we would think of monetary gains or self-respect, we cannot say, even if we empathize with the characters.
Vaishali needn't use that money she gains from Dharmesh. She can just keep it locked in a bank. It is just so that Dharmesh is not left to enjoy that part of the money. I'm not being sadistic here, but there needs to be some kind of punishment for Dharmesh. Whether it happens in PR or not , or if it is even possible legally or not is totally a different thing, but why leave a person like Dharmesh to go scot-free? If it is possible from us to punish him, why not?
That is how I took it as, when Kools mentioned about Vaishali needed monetary gains from Dharmesh and it has nothing to do with being materialistic. This is just my opinion.
Edit: It is not being materialistic, it is called 'expecting justice to be served', which is similar to when a family awaits death sentence for the guilty when their daughter is killed. Killing the guilty person will not bring back their dead daughter, but for the family there is a satisfaction that justice is served. I am giving that just as an example and a strong one at that. This is similar but in a lesser vein. Asking for monetary gain for Vaishali will not bring back the life she has lost or the burden she has to bear in the future of her life, but there will a kind of justice being served and this will no way lessen her self-respect in my humble opinion.
Edited by bee5 - 15 years ago