Kool's Commentary : Feb 1 PR - Page 8

@tanya

There were so many tracks which had potential ..

I want Vaishu to go back to Dharmesh simply because I am bored with her ...🤢

Originally posted by: toothbrush13

Amen to that!

Everything in the story seems so artificial now. And it's not like they had to put in all these fillers because they were out of potential, there were a lot of loose ends left to explore from just the original story (before divorce and to an extent before the remarriage). I caught a few scenes last night on TV and goodness the quality has really dwindled. I honestly don't get why they're going on with the current plot points, if they can even be considered a plot. These filler tracks on siblings of infertility and infidelity - which have been very shoddily done - are things that, if at all, should come in at the last 3-6 months of their contract with Zee when nobody is watching the show anymore but they still have to show something.

Really, they're wasting the potential of the story, the technicians, the actors, and most of all the stronghold they had on the audience.

But I still like your commentary, Kool. The images of Dharmesh in the orange shorts and turban rival the stories on Manohar. 😆

Originally posted by: koolsadhu1000

TB what to do .😆 Sometimes when the episodes SUCK beyond repair I literally put in things with MY imagination ...........the way I wud have commented when I was ...say ....16 . And then I add some tadka of my teekha comments ..............theres no problem getting angry with the show coz it really HELPS u a lot in that way . So Teekha comments come VERY EASILY to me . And lo behold , my awfully ungrammatical commentary is READY . And people sitting in offices all over giggle post lunch .😆

blue: dont forget in middle of lectures at university when the professor is droning on and on about some micro economic theory/😆

Originally posted by: koolsadhu1000

The haveli was a big corny idea .No one gets shelters in havelis nowdays .Havelis r Extinct on Mumbai Poona or Mumbai Nasik roads .

.

And Haveli with two staircases . How Hindi film like .

.

I think script writing team has changed , they r taking story down the drain again .

If Vaishu wants to GO BACK , she shud go .And yes , if Varsha wants to adopt or buy babies , go DO IT .Less headache for us , just get them out of the picture .

The original story was much better , much better .This SUCKS .Post divorce sucked , POST Marraige SUCKS even more .

Hey Kool,

Originally posted by: viram

How regressive can the CVs be.? I can understand it is painful for a woman to know that she is unable to conceive . But it shudnt be shown as if it is a life and death question.What about the feelings of those women who are going through such a situation. Won't it depress them? Let them show that Varsha and Satish adopt a kid.

generally speaking I agree with you that the infertility issue is being mishandled just like the illegitimate child issue and the bigamy issue is being mishandled.

what we must remember is the theme and tone of the show. the theme and the tone is not positive. the theme and tone of the show promote female repression (first subtly and now boldly). this is why archana has been picked as a strong bahu. somebody somewhere is seriously intimidated by intellectuality and independence in women and is portraying it as a negative issue.

archana - the model girl - in the show. the epitome of virtue, chose suicide as the solution to tainted reputation that was thrust upon her, chose submission as the solution for dowry abuse, chose silent acceptance and divorce as the solution for bigamy and inlaw abuse, chose an illicit though platonic relationship with a bethroted ex as a solution for proving eternal love, chose elopement as a solution for gaining her one true love (when her family was not really bartering her but trying to secure her financial future as a gullible virgin undereducated divorcee). All these regressive solutions has won this model of virtue the strongest bahu distinction. Moral of the Story: Suffer, Suffer, Suffer some more and in this unrequired sufferance, dangerous submission and regressive mindset lies the strength of Indian women. this is the message.

vandu - equally regressive inspite of an education and her scum of the earth husband miraculously becomes man of the year.

vaishali and varsha - two girls that were educated, averse to female subjugation of any form, independent of thought, strong minded, determined and worldly (traits that most of today's educated progressive women can relate to in moderation) were shown as the opposite of the model woman Archana and in thus being the opposites the sublime message is that their traits are vices not virtues (which we know is BS because these are exactly the virtues that help women succeed in today's competitive world). the price they have paid for their progressive non-Archu behaviour is bigamy, infertility, extramarital affairs, soon probably to be divorce, poverty, abandonment and terminal illness. the message is that woman who have a brain and some spunk are not strong bahus but destructive feminine influences in Indian society.

the submissive 19th century women married losers and through the mere association of their wives became knights and are now moving towards propesperity.

the progressive 21st century women married the most eligible bachelors and through the mere association of their wives became villians, schemers, jailbirds, liars, cowards and soon-to-be paupers.

I apologize for going on a ranting trip but with these subliminal themes as the basis of this show, I find it hard to believe that any woman in this show who does not adopt the attitude of a regressive woman is destined to ever find true happiness or stability in their life.

If Kools and I were in PR we would be living a hellish life right now as we were not brought up to accept female subjugation in the name of love, romance or spousal devotion. More's the pity.