Originally posted by: koolsadhu1000
samarth ..........I would not describe Savita as a Kumata . A Kumata is one who harms her own offspring ...........sells it , maims it , kills it , eats it . Savita hates Archana , not her son ,She loves her son deeply in her own way . . I am angry at the CVS for blurring her character and retreating hurriedly realising they went too far with the burning incident . However I wud still not call her evil , i wud call her psychologically crazed with grief and the losses she had incurred by then . Coz they were TREMENDOUS . She has no right to burn the child of someone else's womb yes ...............but had this burning attempt been shown on the day Sachin died , over his dead body , the furore wud have been lesser . People wud have put it down to a crazed mother's grief . Not that I justify it ..THEN or NOW . Unfortunately CVS showed her just yelling and screaming over his dead body and this attempt was shown much later when the girl had waltzed 3 times in and out of her life , disrupting it with her so called sacrifices and each time walking away after throwing her life in havoc . First time by labelling her son characterless , second time when she hERSELF requested her NOT TO GO after ensuring she got attached to her , third time by disrupting an entire bana banaya wedding when she had so many days to discuss this rationally and do it . . I have not asked Manav to go back . I have asked him to provide his family with expenses for their upkeep , and look after baby Sachu who is his dead brothers son . I have asked him NOT to make MOTHER WIFE comparison dialogues tactlessly in front of his ignorant uneducated motherand IN FRONT OF HIS WIFE as that wud further complicate things adversely . I also strongly feel that he shud not flaunt his camaraderie with his bogus sasural so openly on his crass , uneducated mom's face ..........coz she witnessed EVERY INSULT that sasural doled out to him . She was there present for it ALL . Each time she and her son had been thrown out or passed over due to their economic status . All She had was her son . They had EVERYTHING else . Today they have even her son .
You say DARK POSSESIVE LOVE . I somehow dont see u dwelling on the time she requested Archana to stay or the time when she told Archu Sukh Dekar tujhe dukh dete huye jaane ki adat hai , u shudnt have played with our emotions that way then if u intended to go .When did Savita change Again to worse ? Only when Manav was jailed a second time . By the same family . The same pattern . Even her arch rival Rasika pointed this out matter f factly to her ..that all those who have gathered around u r hypocrites ...infact they r the ones who will look the other way while ur son rots in jail .Cud she afford losing her only living son ? One she had lost and indirectly this family was responsible for it . She snapped and decided , NOT THIS GIRL AND NOT THIS FAMILY , NAHI CHAHIYE YEH LADKI .Let her be a beauty , Gunvan kalavati whatever , nAHI CHAHIYE . Mind u she had till that point been consistent in her love and acceptance for Archu ..she had gone to Archus engagement to give a good report to Archu's mother in law Prabha . The second jailing however did it for her .She had not listened to Rasika and destroyed Varshas life by revealing her secret but had infact warned Varsha. This was not a woman who had Dark possesiv love . She was uneducated , crass , non diplomatic , blunt , tactless and openly and proudly greedy for wealth as she liked to taste the good things in life .She never taught Vandita to behave badly at her sasural like Rasika teaches Manju even after she is a mother of two kids . No Samarth ...Savita is no Kumata . She is simply Savita .Manju has repeatedly tried to BURN Archanas life ....even today she was there asking for fuel so she cud try again .These Burning attempts and their consistency is far more evil and alarming . All Manju wants is Archna to burn in hell and be miserable . Savita doesnt care if Archna lives or dies once she gets Manav back ..she is indifferent to Archana if she gets her Manav back . This is the essential difference between a dark character and grey character .Although full of mistakes and a foul mouth , she still shines brightly compared to the picture perfect hypocritical Karanjkars who change colors like chameleons . For her only two things matter ...Her Manav and now that Sachin is no more ........her ggrandson Sachu . She doesn't understand why Manav is impractical enough not to understand that alliance with the K family will never come to any good . They will ALWAYS backstab him , they have proved it AGAIN and AGAIN .Its not that she doesn't know that Archana is good .She DOES . This time , she CHOOSES TO IGNORE THAT GOODNESS . And if u look at her losses objectively , can u blame her ? Which mother in the real world wud have welcomed Archna as a bahu after the death of Sachin although directly she wasnt responsible ?The gold necklace she took on the day Archna remarried Manav was more SPITE than greed .Her grabbing of baby Sachu is again her crazed grief that knows no reason . VERY WRONG , but there it is . These r her FAULTS , but with reasons of their own ......very unfortunate reasons . The Savita we saw in beginning of PR and the Savita that remains today r two different people . Her husband actually manipulates her when he puts his mind to it .she is THAT transparent as a character .For me this show is not about the Beautiful , graceful Archana or Ankita Lokhande . Its a story as a whole and without Savita AS SHE IS , the story crumbles . She is far more interesting a character compared to Archana .All that is required is her anger to be channelised positively and her love to be directed correctly when Archana becomes pregnant .I have no doubts she will look after Archana like a mother and protect her in her own , crass , fierce way . I do hope CVS show this .
That was referred on spiritual side. As it was explained to us, an offspring can only partially repay his debt, if he/she were to help his parent reach to true dharma and peace. The premise being, a person, by his/her efforts has found correct path (dhrama), while his parent is to do it (not even exactly kumata).
A parent may yet be harmful spiritually, while not exactly harming her own offspring directly if she tries to sell/maim/kill/eat other human being in her blind grief. Please take it in this context.
Your anger on Cvs is wholeheartedly shared. They keep on heaping unfathomable inconsistencies on each characters- be it supporting characters or the leads.
Your advise on tact (I'd referred in earlier post), is best way available in the present scenario.
Manjusha or Karanjikar's harmful interferences are equally agreed upon.
The gold necklace carried in spite is… umm, a shaky logic stretched too far. Here let's agree to disagree.
In fact most of your points, I'm concurring. While your opinions or comments are your prerogative, as a special commentator, only thing I'd urge you, is to fleece them unhesitatingly on criminal lacunae like- half exonerated bigamy, bride burning, unsolved murders (Prakash), open dowry demands (and somehow 'enough' is not enough on this issues- I am so livid on them Cvs.😡)- as well as leads defects.
Your detailed response is appreciated. Thanks. More in the Evening and at your fresh spread of coffee (commentary).😊 See you.
Anupamaa
Pocket Mein Aasman
Cricket
