Ashamed of Archu's family - Page 5

Originally posted by: koolsadhu1000

By all means😆😆😆

Originally posted by: tarantulla_p

The Karanjkars are a confused bunch. They want the best for Archana and assume the best is her remarriage. The problem is there is a huge disconnect from what they want for her and what she is clearly happy with.

If they genuinely want to see her happy, how come none of them ever asks Manav if he cares enough to kill all the roadside romeos for her, why did he divorce her? They are always after Archana for answers. She is very clearly still in love with the guy but cant marry him coz he WONT marry her. So, there isnt much she can do can she.

All middleclass Indian families perceive a daughter is better off married with a kid or two than all alone with a smashing career. This is a fact and I am sure the Karanjkars are no different here. Where they are wrong according to me is they never stood up for her when her first marriage was crumbling all around her. All of them accepted Manav's ill adviced decision with no opposition and they are fooling themselves now that Archana is ready to move on when she clearly is kicking and screaming otherwise.

My two cents are : the only person to blame for all of Archana's miseries post marriage is Manav. Had he been half a husband that Vinod is to Manju and we wouldnt see the poor girl in such a miserable situation.

Originally posted by: smrth

I don't want to hurt on personal levels.

Originally posted by: nikitagmc

I agree with you, not much to write cos you people have said a lot. While everyone keeps blaming Archna- Manav, they are no less innocent. And the bashing about the PR is now getting quite irritable. Once it was okay, but everyday??? Its like they want to hide their own guilts of forcing Archana into the marriage.

The only person on this show who is still likeable is Satish. Archana Manav have made a lot of foolish decisions. However, that does not absolve anyone else of their mistakes too. The sisters are lost in their own lala land, and Mom and Dad are heaping their antiquated ideas on their daughter- he accepted you with your ateet and blah blah.

PS: Vidyasu, it is nice to read varying opinions. I really liked your last posts regarding the factory strikes thing. I hope you will start commenting again.

Originally posted by: -SD-

agree with you all. I feel like asking these questions to the CVs as well as all PR forum members.

Why Jaywant? Only because dharmesh chose that man and he agreed to marry Archu? how can sulochana still say 'jaywant ke sath archu khush rahegi wo ek achha pati saabit hoga etc' though she knows Archu hates that man because of the manav jail incidence..? If archu wants to stay alone, whats wrong with that?

Originally posted by: rashmi26181

Originally posted by: smrth

Vidyasu, it was a pleasure to go through your posts anytime I chance to see them.

Regarding this constant usurpation of the story's carriage by side characters with not miniscule contribution by the script writers, with their continuous demeaning of the main leads, has left hugely unsatisfactory plot. With the clumsiest hand they go on suspending a most irritating kind of 'grayness'- hijacking the tale to a fool's land. In the process, the leads are subjected to absurdness, subservience, tomfoolery and annoying artificiality in their scripts. Clear case of periphery at the cost of core

Originally posted by: sunimaleed

Quite rightly said. In fact this family has lost all meaning of having a good relationship with people who have always been kind and loving towards them. To be mean to a person who has done soo much for them and turning away from him when he needed them the most was the most cruel thing to do. Where is the humanity and sacrifice these parents had taught their children? Varsha is despicable and Vaishu is the worst kind of person I would want to associate with as sister.
It is quite amazing to see Satish being very concerned about the affairs of Manav more than this family.
Vinod is also very inconsiderate and how can he talk so rudely to a person who has brought so much meaning and reason for them to move.
Was it not Manav who helped to get Varsha out of her messy situation when she was involved with a married man? Was he not present at her wedding and helped her both financially and afterwards when she was going through a lot of problems bcos of her previous relationship with a married man? Was it not also he who stood by her at the time?
Vaishu also was helped by Manav even on the day of her wedding when they ran out of food and when there was no one to help them and saved them from the embarrassment?
Was he not divorced from Archu all along during these times? At that time they considered him to be their son and not even their son-in-law.
Even before getting married to Archu was it not he who saved their father from committing suicide and then agreed to marry Archu after knowing what a traumatic experience she went through with Ajith trying to defame her that led to the eventual breakup of Archu's proposed marriage to Satish?
Why can't creatives portray this family to be what they stand up for?