Bigg Boss 19: Daily Discussion Thread - 25th Sep 2025
Yeh Rishta Kya Kehlata Hai Sept 25, 2025 EDT
ROOM SERVICE 25.9
🏏T20 Asia Cup 2025: PAK vs BD, Match 17, A2 vs B2 - Super 4 @Dubai🏏
Hawt Geetmaan Moments 🔥🔥💋💋
Deepika to reunite with Vin Diesel for XXX 4?
Important Questions
Movies of Sonam Kapoor's which I enjoyed
Sameer Wankhede takes Aryan Khan’s series TBOB to Court
Yeh Rishta Kya Kehlata Hai Sept 26, 2025 EDT
Hrithik at Homebound screening…what happened?
Quiz for BB19 Members.
DANDIYA NIGHT 26.9
OTT vs. theatre: which one do you prefer?
Daayra shooting begins - Kareena and Prithviraj
How Salman Khan Would Address You in Weekend Ka Vaar? Quiz
Abhira master planner of breaking Arman relationships
Going by the script- at present, on three counts they are dubious w.r.t. Archana or her welfare;
1. Allowing Dharmesh's perverse attack go reproach less, let alone insisting on a counter apology for his loose behavior. In a civilized family, a SIL can not have such license.😆 Arre baba samarth Archna slapped him . Even in the yelling sHE yelled first .😆😆😆😆
2. Even more dangerously, they let go the fraud of a fiance with out even a whimper, not giving any real thought to the morals of a creep under the condonance of 'itna bhi bura nahi he..'. More concerned parent would surely weigh the prospects or dangers to a normal married life with such a person.True3. Suffering and submitting meekly to 'not- so- infrequent' dictates of a future MIL even before the marriage, not giving any thought- into what kind of poisonous, autocratic environ, full of suspicions, their daughter is heading to.😆😆😆😆 U mean Prabhi The Siamese Cat . She looked pretty nasty when she told Sulo EK minute , The matter is NOT for discussion , didn't she . When she demanded Archu leave her job .
But I can not see them as a family to be ashamed of. They are merely weak- for all the claims to a moralistic value system of a sound middleclass.😊 Yes .
Originally posted by: sereaishitedare
I don't understand why these people don't understand the simple concept of grieving. Archana needed time to grieve the ending of her marriage, and she was never given the opportunity to before being pushed into another relationship. I know some people think she had over a year to grieve, but sometimes it takes a lifetime to grieve, and it's evident that Archu hadn't had proper time to grieve because she is still gaga over Manav.
I also don't understand the concept of needing a man to live a happy life. I am offended by that being a woman, and I don't understand why the creatives of the show portray such idiotic ideas on a very popular show. I honestly believe they are a bunch of 40 year old sickos sitting around upset at the social progress some parts of India are making with respect to women's rights and don't want to see that progress, therefore they show such idiotic concepts to promote their despicable views.Also, why do they have to show good people being so passive? Just because you are a nice person, doesn't mean you need to let everyone boss you around. Archana's parents are portrayed as well-meaning parents and respectable members of society, but in my point of view they are nothing but emotional bullies that don't want an identity of their own and just want to blend into their society, and in turn aren't letting their daughter have an identity of her own either.Why does a woman always need to be known by her relationships? Sulochana's daughter, Manav's ex-wife, Vinod's sister, Jaywant's fiancee? I think its pathetic.Who on here agrees with me and if you don't agree with me on certain topics, I'd love to hear from you.=)
Originally posted by: vidyasu1
I rarely comment these days because it has not been a pleasant experience for me.. However, I could not help myself this once. I agree with you 200 per cent. Archana has been bashed mercilessly on this forum while her family has been spared and held to be right -- for the simple reason that the daughter voluntarily decided to divorce her beloved. Does that give them the right to push her into marriage with a person whom she quite plainly abhors? How can they not see her distress? Her dad finally seemed to have figured out the truth but her mom advocated the usual jugaad stuff. Once she is married everything will be all right. How? Why? Why should it be all right? It is not Manav who forced Jaywant on Archana. That crime was done by Dharmesh with wholehearted support from sulochana. She threatened and forced manav into giving Archana an ultimatum.. She made him feel guilty, called him selfish. After all this, she goes around as if she is the best mom in the world.
Vaishali in particular annoys me. I hang my head in shame for doormat women like her. Had I been in her place I would have given a tongue-lashing to my husband, perhaps even walked out on him. How can she absolve Dharmesh completely while blaming her sister, refusing even to accept her apology? An unnecessary apology in the first place. How can Vaishali be oblivious to the gargantuan flaws in her husband's character? How can she support him being so mean, selfish and cruel? I felt like murdering Dharmesh when he spoke of Manav's undeserved raise. The man was put in jail by you, the least you can do is compensate him. Had he sued you for defamation you'd have likely had to shell out money in lakhs.
Kool your post in fact proves my point: that the script writers have created a story where the family appears the picture of reasonableness -- when, at least in my opinion, it is not. -- in contrast to the stubborn and psychotic daughter.. They have deliberately made the leads neurotic so as to glorify the family.: After all who will put up with such a daughter?
And excuse me, was sulochana not the intelligent mother who always told her daughter she must educate herself and find a job? Assuming Archu chooses to stay single, why should she have to live off her brother? Can't she get a job or is marriage the only option in life for women? Mumbai is a progressive city. I lived there years ago and was fascinated by the long line of female office-goers at bus stops and train stations. It has a culture of women going to work. I just don't accept that, Dombivilli or not, women have to stay at home and look after babies or they are finished. If they must work, it must be within the parameters drawn by husband and mother-in-law. At least Sulochana with her so-called progresive (but in fact not) outlook should know better than to believe this hogwosh theory.India is changing, Mumbai more so, and it is really sad that the CVs have chosen to perpetuate the "abla naari" stereotype rather than show a woman being able to take care of herself.If I remember correctly, Archana told Jaywant off -- several times. She told him she will never, ever marry him. She stuck to this line even after Manav's ultimatum. It was after shravni blasted her and accused her of being selfish that she, against her will, went to J. That is hardly voluntary. She again decided to break up with him and told her parents so but they emotionally blackmailed her without understanding her distress. At this point J had been proven to be a cheat with possible criminal instincts. But the parents just cannot see this. The less said of her horrible, utterly selfish sisters, the better. Varsha can throw a pillow at her lovely father-in- law but can't say a word to her goonda b-i-l. She is an insult to womanhood. As is Vaishali who seems to worship the ground her criminal husband walks on. No amount of all this being practical can convince me that this is correct and must be accepted. Sorry if this sounds like a rant. Just as well I decided to stay out. Otherwise there will be daily fireworks.😊
i just wnt to add 1 ting here,they r living in an era were d only way out of a rape victim is to marry d rapist,and vandita was a studying she wasnt at home still she got married to ajit.d fact is dis k family is very gud to archu,u remember sulochana slapping varsha cause she had gne for dinner wid her friends.and a fact is a fact a girl like archu needs sumbody in her life a whole lot of education cant mke her normal,i am saying dis wtching yestday episode were she burnt her hand and if sulochan wldnt hav cum she wld hav gone furter wid it.AS sulochana thoughts r concerned,i hav seen my parents worried abt my marriage from d dtime i remember,now i realise it she is collecting gold,vessels for us for so long,all parents r worried for their child future, and if archu wld hav shown or tryed to get over manav her mther wldnt b so desperste to get her married,her life was just revolving around him and it is still d same.Originally posted by: sereaishitedare
Hi there Kool, I remember you from Ghar ki Lakshmi Betiyaan, and I remember we agreed on most everything 😆I understand what you mean by being the odd one out in society, and I agree with you on that, but that is not the issue I have with the creatives here. The issue I have with them is that they portray antiquated ideas regardless of whom they use as their scapegoat character. Whether its Sulochana or Manav, they are still trying to say that all women need a man in their lives to live happy productive lives. That is simply not the case. I have two aunts who are not married, and its not like they weren't pressurized, they just didn't give in to the pressures. They showed strength of character and stood up for themselves (this is in india by the way) and that is what I would have liked to see from a TV show as popular as PR simply because it is watched by so many and the characters are idealized by so many impressionable youth.About making a home with Vinod and his bitchy wife, who says Archu has to live with them. She got her magical one-year education and can hold a job, get an apartment of her own and live her life happily. Women can do so many things without a man in their lives. I'll use my aunts as examples. One is a doctor and the other a beautician. They both adopted children and have many friends they hang out with. Their friends have become their extended families. And the only real blood family they talk to are the ones who respected their decision not to get married. If India's going to progress, the everyday people need to know how society works outside their little village or street or community, and there is no better way to get this information to them than it is through television soap operas.About what a horrible life she will have with her bro and his wife, what about the life she COULD possibly have with Jaywant.. What's the guarantee that he will keep her happy? What's the likelihood that she will accept her as her husband willingly?My problem with Sulochana stems from her inability to recognize that her daughter, the one she claims to know better than anyone, is grieving the loss of her marriage. Why can't she for the love of god let her daughter have some space to get over the loss of her marriage. I'm sure at some point after Manav and Shravani are married, she will truly accept the fate of her marriage and move on. Why can't Sulochana wait until her daughter is good and ready?A lot of girls tell their parents they won't marry, the parents don't take them seriously because they trust their children to understand life and understand what they want from life as they mature or pass through whatever phase it is that they are going through, why couldn't Sulochana trust her daughter to make the right decision for her life? As much as I try to, I don't understand why Sulochana puts the happiness and opinions of outsiders on a higher pedestal than her daughter's happiness. The only reason this drama started was because one of her neighbors said something about Archu getting married again.About Manav and his weakness of character, I never defended his character or the emotional blackmailing he did to Archu. He was just as wrong as Sulochana was. When I said that Sulochana and everyone in the Karanjkar family praise Manav and love on him when they need him and discard him when he is of no use anymore, this is exactly what I meant. She went to him to beg him to get her daughter to understand that she needed to remarry, so he did, then when he was in trouble and needed help, she supported her infuriatingly self-centered AND WRONG damaad Dharmesh. I wanted to get in there and slap Sulochana herself when she yelled at Archu for slapping Dharmesh.I've always hated Manav for stripping his wife of her rights to give those rights to his BROTHER's fiancee. I've never forgiven him for that, and I don't think I ever will. I don't think it was appropriate of him to value his word over the happiness and rights of his wife whom he loved dearly, especially when Shravani was willingly telling him to go to Archu. Having said that Archu is equally to blame. If she had told Manav that I don't WANT to give up my rights for Shravani, he would have probably changed his decision, but she didn't.I do NOT understand why they did what they did at that time, but I do know that if they were allowed to be friends and hang out from the beginning without being ridiculed and shamed, they would have gotten over each other a lot faster. Because absence makes the heart grow fonder right? The chase is more exciting than the catch a lot of times, and chasing is all these two have been doing.And finally, I agree, Manav IS very old fashioned with his idea of purity and all that junk.