Kools Commentary : Sep 27 PR - Page 9

Thanks Nicki ..

Hai Kool di Nice commentary asusual. Enjoyed it.😊.

Serial still not get booted.Lagging some where.Hope archu finds out the thing going on Background soon.I couldn't get why they(archu and ajit) haven't started thinking or trying to know what prakash has done.They still doesn't decicded to go behind prakash.Ajit seems to fogot that the machines were heat that day.ok,even if he assumes,it was hot because those two died would have used it,then he should also know that management wasn't responsible for that and I have to confront the actual culprit.Why still they haven't thought on those lines.

Poor sathish.He has finally give up on emotional pressure.EVeryone in PR seems to do what is right from their point of you and what is right for them.

guys the day just started and already i am feeling sleepy😕

Originally posted by: vidyasu1

kool, GM, you have not asked one vital question. The reporter rightly asked why a lowly worker was being charged with murder. Manv was so lowly that the management sacked him in preference to Prakash who was shown to have not one redeeming quality.I said repeatedly we know nothing of the reasons why Manavs' expertise was not required when he was sacked.In a company,u need expertise.U tend to assumePrakash is not good at his work purely on what he was shown as personally.I simply dont.They havent yet shown one scene where Manav and Prakash hav been differentiated on basis of their work If Manav had to be sacked for indiscipline, Prakash needed to go even more. He almost killed Manav.Who knew about this?DId manav complain and most importantly,the whole brawl took place outside the company and Manav was not sacked for that.He was getting sacked for the previous brawl in the company premises.What happens outside the company ground is not managements' responsibility.Sorry I disagree.Manav was more lowly according to the management--Now,when did the management say he was more lowly?If u want to assume this as he was chose to be sacked for the simple reason that his expertise was not needed anymore,then pls say so., yet two days after sacking he becomes foundry incharge and is charged with negligence and murder -- murder, nothing less. The logic is so spurious. If he was good enough to be foundry incharge, he should not have been sacked. Period. And if he was lowly enough to be sacked, he cannot become foundry incharge two days later. I find the sympathy for Dharmu, simply because he is managment, as unacceptable as sympathy for workers simply because they are workers. Dharmu can save his butt -- he can say investyigate the robbery, we are not responsible -- but he had NO BUSINESSS, ABSOLUTELY NO BUSINESS, allowing an innocent man -- and he knows Manav is innocent -- to be charge with murder. Dharmesh pretending to be sympathetic and considerate towards the workers makes him even more hateable. Would any of you like to be charged with murder in return for some compensation being paid to your family? Can this ever be right and justified? How is this professionalism? Is professionalism only for poor workers? The management can do what it wants and get by calling it professionalism? THIS IS NOT ON.

Yes.Dharmesh is not responsible for robbery.The workers were.Management is not responsible.They plan to frame Manav,this is where they are wrong.Nothing can be justified.But then vidyasu how can u justify thousands same-poor-workers going jobless and their innocent families suffering bcoz Manav,the innocent-loyal worker had to be got out at any cost?I dont think justice for one innocent shud come at the cost of thousands.DHarmesh is trying to frame Manav.Correct.But he is not responsible for any of the mess ..nor is actually the culprit.He is not pretending to be sympathetic.He is sympathetic but when he has to choose btwn saving himself n another innocent guy,he was weak enuf to save himself.....he'll suffer frm his wrong choice but I cant hate him for saving is own INNOCENT butt.

GM, yesterday they were showing that episode in Canada where Archana tells Prabha that she will go and meet Manav in jail .

I think Archcna was very open about her feelings for Manav . The way she invited him at her enaggement and went up to him ...she is very open about what she feels for him ..

I go with u tanya..I didnt think she was rude.She was firm n refused politely.Everytime that lady prabha keeps telling what ehsaan she has done by accepting her with her past...isnt that being rude to Sulo?Who the hell was asking her to do ehsaan on Archu?Nah!!...she'll please her son by doing so and then go around throwing weight,saying she did so.

Agree with u tanya.Archana has been very honest about her feelings with Manav.

GM, if you remember , she had decided to stop talking to him ..She was totally ignoring him and standing beside Jaywant .

Originally posted by: Tanyaz

GM, if you remember , she had decided to stop talking to him ..She was totally ignoring him and standing beside Jaywant .

But now this terrible thing has happened and that is why she has changed .

She will never leave him in this time ...never ...

I wonder how he will behave when she will be in the jail ....

I will give him a big fat thappad if he does not help her out. And make him sit on a donkey and take him round his chawl.😈