Posted:
Hai Kool Di. Nice,Excellent commentary asusual.Enjoyed reading it. Oh that throwing tomatoes and about pets was so good di.😆😆.
I too wish as TB wished,Manohar would be ther.Then his expressions are to be watched and Your take on it will be super fabulous.....I would have been doing non-stop😆😆😆.......
I think all three of them(Dharmu,Rasika, and manav) had flaws,though dharmu with being lesser flaws.Just now I posted my view on it in Tanya Di's thread.
Dharmu was 100% right professionally and as a Bussiness man.When the employee has the right to switch their job for their future prosperity by giving intimation before a certain period ,then same goes for employer too. if employess doesn't satisfy with the job(when they needs more),they changes to other one, so in same way,when employer doesn't need or not satisfied with the emloyee then he too can dismiss them adhering to rules and regulations.
By saying this,DHarmu was legally correct,but where he would have done better is,he would have explained the same norms (and his plight and comapny needs)to workers before asking his supervisior to read the names.
We know it as he said to sathish he would be giving time and compensation but workers didn't know.And some may be illetrate to know the conditions and norms.so if is explainesd to them they will be less emotional and angered .
Manav anger at archu is so wrong.It will not be justified by any means.
Okk. by all these fights,how it will be solved before sunday special epi.😕
I too wish as TB wished,Manohar would be ther.Then his expressions are to be watched and Your take on it will be super fabulous.....I would have been doing non-stop😆😆😆.......
I think all three of them(Dharmu,Rasika, and manav) had flaws,though dharmu with being lesser flaws.Just now I posted my view on it in Tanya Di's thread.
Dharmu was 100% right professionally and as a Bussiness man.When the employee has the right to switch their job for their future prosperity by giving intimation before a certain period ,then same goes for employer too. if employess doesn't satisfy with the job(when they needs more),they changes to other one, so in same way,when employer doesn't need or not satisfied with the emloyee then he too can dismiss them adhering to rules and regulations.
By saying this,DHarmu was legally correct,but where he would have done better is,he would have explained the same norms (and his plight and comapny needs)to workers before asking his supervisior to read the names.
We know it as he said to sathish he would be giving time and compensation but workers didn't know.And some may be illetrate to know the conditions and norms.so if is explainesd to them they will be less emotional and angered .
Manav anger at archu is so wrong.It will not be justified by any means.
Okk. by all these fights,how it will be solved before sunday special epi.😕
Jhanak
