Daily Discussion Thread : 30th April - Page 10

hey all i am back on land..well the land of heat..good to be back home and of course i just couldn't resist coming on PR

Originally posted by: koolsadhu1000

How ? I have been hearing this fact stated in this thread for quite sometime now and I wud really like to know how the fact that Manav ' fully intends to pay ' makes him very noble or great . How does Manav intend to pay ? This in itself is a big question .

Originally posted by: Arien_03

Regarding Shravani's reaction when she finds out that Manav has borrowed money from her father for Varsh's wedding, it was justifiable for her to be mad at Manav if it was a normal love/arranged marriage between her and Manav. But how can she forget that Manav and Archana are doing a sacrifice for her that she cannot ever imagine of doing, she is fully aware by now that they both love each other and the only reason Manav is marrying her is coz of his promise. So must she show her pettiness over the borrowed money under these circumstances? She doesn't have right to behave as a normal fiancee would behave simply because her engagement to Manav was out of compassion due to her pregnancy. Has Manav or anyone else in Deshmukh s house ever told her that she committed a mistake and Manav and Archana are paying for her mistakes? Then why she is pointing out Manav's mistakes.

Originally posted by: koolsadhu1000

Regarding her 'small heart ' she did NOT display a small heart when the insurance money kept for her child was used up without even informing her for Vandus MIL"S demands

Originally posted by: Arien_03

Say Manav is unable to pay back the money, wouldn't it be a small price for Girishji to pay considering Manav took responsibility of his pregnant daughter and her child and giving up his own happiness and marriage for her sake. Is money so important, 3 lacs rupees matter and Manav, Archana's sacrifice for Shravani doesn't?

Originally posted by: koolsadhu1000

The importance that Archna is talking about .....is importance as a woman which Shravni never got from Manav . Savita treated her well partly coz she was rich , partly coz she was carrying their blood in her womb . But no one really bothered to see her as an individual in her own right or evaluate her that way .

Originally posted by: Arien_03

Shravani is not Sachin's widow, Manav has taken her and child's responsibility, while she is now claiming to be Manav's wife, why should she also claim insurance money from Sachin's death? Vandu is also Sachin's sister and hence was his responsibility too.

Originally posted by: koolsadhu1000

My dear , everyone has lost perspective of the story now .

I repeat ..........Manav is marrying Shravni with a goal .........he too wants Sachins blood in deshmukh family only . See Savita . She KNOWS Archna is good yet she wants the divorce .....why ? Coz she wants the baby .

What do u think Manav and Savita's reaction will be if Shravni wishes him best of luck with Archna and marries another guy ? Will he like to see Sachins baby growing up with different name and different family ?

It is my feeling that this fact holds far more importance to Manav than even Archna . So u see it is no great sacrifice on his part . Neither on Archus part as when this was decided she was divorcing Manav and came back much much later .

I think I have a new favorite character: MOHANRAO!! This guy is so jolly, I love it! He reminds of a chubby, fuzzy, Koala bear.

Originally posted by: koolsadhu1000

Disagree totally here . Sorry . Whether she was widow or not is immaterial ..........she was the legal nominee . Legally and morally she alone has claim over it as clearly in his lifetime SAchin Wished it himself . Why did Sachin not put Savitas or Vandus name then ? It was his wish which he put down in legal terms in black and white .

Moral responsibility factor can be agreed upon but again .......only if the legal nominee recognizes it with understanding .And That understanding Shravni very much displayed in plentitude .........and hence I did not see a 'small heart ' . I however saw a small heart everywhere in Manju's behaviour , who did not ever recognize Vinods ethical responsibilities as a traditional midle class guy towards his family too and always flaunted the Punni is ur responsibility factor .

Lets not talk about legalities and morals with regards to Shravani. Her father's insistance on engagement and her being engaged to Manav was not legal either while Manav was still married. Sachin didn't put Savita's name coz he knew hoe greedy Savita was and he chose to put Shravani's name coz he had expected her to be his wife. He didn't know he'll die so soon and his fiancee will move so swiftly into getting engaged to his elder brother.