I don't understand..!!! - Page 2

Created

Last reply

Replies

256

Views

14.1k

Users

19

Likes

205

Frequent Posters

448368 thumbnail
Posted: 15 years ago
#11
@nikita
there's a big diff betn getting engaged nd being married isn't it? All I want is Manav to protect Archu frm any kind of humiliation atleast as long as she is in his house.....that's his duty.
Once they r legally divorced he can do as many puja nd rituals wid Shravni as he nd his mom wants no one wld complain.
nikitagmc thumbnail
16th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 15 years ago
#12

@piya: I am not saying Manav was right in agreeing to sit with shravani. He was wrong. Shravani is not his wife and only a married couple can sit in the pooja.

But consider the situation at that time. He had said that he would do the pooja with shravani, suddenly everyone says do the pooja with archu since shravani is not available... arey wah, iska kya matlab hai? At that time no one was thinkign that Archu is Manav's wife so she should sit... everyone thought Shravani is not there so archu should sit. Is Archu shravani's replacement or something.
We all know very well that Manav didn't want to sit with Shravani. He was so sad in the earlier scene. He was hurt and we all know it. Still he says.. we shud wait for shravani.. why???
Coz he knows it is wrong that Shravani should sit in the pooja... but it is even more wrong that Archu should be taken for granted this way... horribly wrong!
And humiliation? You know what was the humiliating thing? In front of Archu' s parents, Savita said shravani is not there so you can sit in the puja... what the heck??? Is she a tissue paper or something???? Sulochana should have shouted out just then that why should my daughter sit and follow these trsditions of marriage when your son didn't follow them? He got engaged in front of her eyes.
But she didn't say it. Not Sulochana, not Manohar, not Damodar. The only person who realised this was unfair was her husband Manav. And when he protested, albeit in a different way... not by saying.. no Archu can't sit with me (which would have been far toooo humiliating) but by quetly saying lets wait for shravani... he gets stones and sticks in return.
Not fair!!!
nikitagmc thumbnail
16th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 15 years ago
#13
All I'm trying to point out is that Manav is wrong in agreeing to sit with shravani, but he wasn't wrong in refusing to sit with Archana, especially when she was being asked to sit only as a replacement for shravani.
gaurimisha thumbnail
19th Anniversary Thumbnail Visit Streak 180 Thumbnail + 5
Posted: 15 years ago
#14
Atleast wait for two months...
His getting engaged was very wrong...but still their marriage holds more credibility n in a pooja,engagement doesnt stand infront of a marraige.The best thing was he shud hav refused to sit with either.
Tanyaz thumbnail
15th Anniversary Thumbnail Trailblazer Thumbnail + 5
Posted: 15 years ago
#15
I think the Karanjskar do not wish to interfere with their daughter's life any more . they feel guilty thatthey have wronged her and then it was that satish fiasco where Archana was angry with her mother to do something behind her back . And of course Archana clearly telling sal that manav is the most important person in her life . What can they do now .
I feel sorry for the, They are being so nice, they were even nice to Shravani ...
And yes , big difference between a wife or a fiance . Manav should told his mother in the begining only tha t as long as Archana is in this house , we will not do anything to humiliate her whatsoever .
Like he did , right in front of her parents ...
Edited by Tanyaz - 15 years ago
sensodyne thumbnail
15th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 15 years ago
#16
Niki i completely agree with u..
but i just want Manav to protect Archu from his aayi as I'm sure Savita will blame Archu only for sitting with Manav for pooja.
448368 thumbnail
Posted: 15 years ago
#17
@ nicky
I understand yr POV nd u r ryt bt such subtle hints r lost on Savita nd the Karanjkars as well maybe even to Archu....did u see her xpression she ws heart broken Archu still believes that she is his wife nd wants to sit fr the puja......which in a way bugs me coz she is bringing it on herself (humiliation) wat I wld hve liked is Archu to in a nice bt straight manner telling every one present there that since Shravni is going to be Manav's wife in days to cme nd everyone including Manav wants her to sit in the puja....then that's the way it shld be done....we all shld wait fr Shravni.
Spartacus thumbnail
18th Anniversary Thumbnail Stunner Thumbnail
Posted: 15 years ago
#18
One word which summarize's the whole concept!
Relationship status - Its complicated.
Sachin---->Shravani------>Manav------->Archu------>??????
Sachin<----->Shravani<----->Manav<------Archu<-----??????

The bottom line i am also confused....................>
Edited by Akashspartan - 15 years ago
koolsadhu1000 thumbnail
17th Anniversary Thumbnail Stunner Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 15 years ago
#19
I agree with Ismita.

There is no earthly compulsion for only Manav to sit in a Satyanarayan pooja ...........Damodar and Savita could sit too . This shud ideally have been suggested by Manav , who shud have said I cannot do religious sacrilege like this , so AAi Baba u both sit . It depends on what vow Archu took .......that if Damodar returned alive she wud have a Satyanarain pooja offered or if she herself wud do the Satyanarain pooja . I doubt the latter coz being a traditional Marathi lady she knows that for that a couple has to sit and currently all that wud only lead to controversy and hurt .

I second Nikita in being committed to Shravni thing ..........it wud be the decent thing to do . If he has given commitment to shravni he has to stick to it and not lead her on . If he waited for Shravni that was really nice . He has categorically told Archana that they cannot get back together that he has committed himself to a higher cause .....the baby . Fine . Now the decent thing to do wud be to stay totally committed as any other move wud be unfair to a woman ........Shravni . My respect for him wud increase if he stays committed to her .

Archana seems to have reconciled to the two wives situation .........she doesnt seem to have any mind of her own or any self respect at all . When told not to sit she doesnt sit , when told to sit , she sits ! I mean where the hell is she as a woman in all this ? Letting Savita use her this shamelessly , is this rubbish doormat attitude 'unconditional love ' for Manav ?

Archna shud have REFUSED to sit for the Satyanarayan . I wONT SIT shud have been the attitude with a blunt SORRY to DAMODAR .

Manav shud have gone a step further and not just waited for Shravni but got up and walked away saying AAI BABA u both sit anyway since pooja is in Babas honour it befits more if u both sit .

Shravni is perfectly right in feeling hurt or disappointed upon seeing Manav Archu doing pooja..........see her face . It is the face of a normal woman having normal feelings . Savita first used her to get 7 lacs , then used Archna to get pooja done and save face . Then she will take seven lacs and evilly put poison in Shravnis mind that archu took advantage of situation when u were gone ..........and go scot free , getting the seven lacs and also becoming Shravnis well wisher .

The evil woman needs a public flogging if u ask me . Neither does she have respect for the Satyanarayan , nor genuine grief for son , nor love for Shravni . The money wasnt running away she cud easily have picked it next week by letting Shravni do the pooja .

Archna needs to sincerely stop being this involved in the Deshmukh scenario simply for the sake of having 'lovely memories' to take home [ What bloody memories yaar , r these any memories] and understand the meaning and spelling of self respect . She also needs a serious lesson in understanding that unconditional love doesnt mean loss of self respect .



LotusPetals thumbnail
16th Anniversary Thumbnail Stunner Thumbnail + 4
Posted: 15 years ago
#20

Exactly Tasnime... I dont blame anyone who is angry with Manav, be angry with him... even I'm angry, but why accuse him from both sides.
Like I was angry with him yesterday that he said ok to do the puja with shravani coz shravani is not married to him and had no right to do the puja with him... he should have pointed it out to his Mom, but I'm happy that he did not say no Archu will do the puja with me since she is my wife. If he had said so, I would have got in and given him a slap saying what wife... you got engaged in front of her... ab yaad aa raha hai that she is your wife?

True .. if they do wanna be angry with him, then be .. jst like you, I don't blame anyone, this is their right and if they think he's wrong, then be .. but why blame him once he does wht u all wanted him to do ( ie .. stay committed to his honewale patni ) ..
I'm sure no one would have liked it if he had agreed to sit with Archu .. but now, why to blame him because he refused to sit with her ?
First, he doesn't have the right to do the pooja with Shravni as technically they aren't married yet .. if ppl think that because he put the sindoor on her, why creatives bothered to show the engagement thn ? that clearly means that he's NOT married to her and he will never marry her as well ! Besides, a pregnant lady can't marry and take the pheras or do any pooja except the one for the pregant lady nd expecting baby for their well being .. so how could she anyways perform the pooja even if she was there ? Manav is a good spiritual boy, so he should have pointed this out ..
but I was personally happy that he did perform the pooja with Archu in front of the churail ..
Shravani has no right to do the puja with him, agreed. But Manav also has no right to make Archu sit with him and do the puja with him since he got engaged in front of her. He cannot do kabhi Archu kabhi shravani according to his whims and fancies. Today when everyone said shamelessly that Archu you do the pooja (despite getting Manav engaged to shravani in front of everyone) he clearly said we better wait for Shravani. I was happy that he did not use Archu like tissue paper unlike his aai and gave respect to her.

That is what "shocked" me .. 😆 .. coz we knw Savita is greedy for money right .. but she also has the same hatred towards Archu, nd she's also a religious person, so how on earth can she agree that Manav should perform the pooja with Archu ?? And are Sulohar dumb and shameless ? they should have pointed out to Savita that Archu isn't a doll ( well beauty wise, she is 😆 ) and that she just can't use her like this !! Their daughter is being humiliated and they just stand and watch it .. Had it been my parents, savita would have been dead by now or n my feet 😆.. Like you said, I think Manav should just have walked out but I think he didn't as it was Archu's promise to God, nd he cant' play with his father's life .. ( I knw jst an excuse to exonerate him 😆 ) ..

Unfortunately it seems everyone is thinking only about the romantic aspect as of now.

Well All I have to say is that romance only won't make a couple's life happy .. and in real life, couples aren't romancing 24/7 .. every couple has problems, sometimes due to circumstances which eventually leads to divorce declared ..

Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".