THIS WEEK, pdptrp used data from channel flyers and were transparent about it.
In PREVIOUS weeks (and years), they have used a consistent metric and the data would come from Medialogic itself, not the channel flyers.
Where the formula matched the one in the channel flyer, they were of course identical. When ary used same metric, the numbers were same, and when geo used same metric, numbers matched too. hum tv has been using a completely different metric, excluding some centers and age groups. that's why their #s do not match. Green whenever they have published trp have been off their rockers when slicing and dicing the data (once they only showed trp for one city and only one center in there).
People are now making unfounded claims about data manipulation, data source, applying same random coefficient to change trps. Pdptrp lists have been posted on IF since 2 years but it is so interesting to note that all the naysayers and those undermining pdptrp lists in favour of channel flyers, only popped up since May. What a curious co-incidence. Where were the naysayers when we discussed TRPs using pdptrps before May? Or did pdptrp only started fudging #s after May?
1.2k