Originally posted by: Simi1711
Two things, quite categorically speaking here.
I don't understand how can people compare people's popularity based on their Instagram followers, when two accounts are bound to have different stats depending on when the person joined Instagram as well as how active they are (I am not even bringing the fact that social media agencies buy followers for their clients)My JD includes social media management, and gosh! Not even a fool would compare an Instagram account stats that began posting pictures actively from September 2016 with only 81 posts at present to an account that became active from April 2013 and has around 1,331 posts. 😆You cannot compare an account that seldom posts stuff to an account that posts at least 10 selfies consecutively in the same dress and same pose, just with different facial expression 😆So, MATHEMATICALLY, the account which is hardly 8 months old, with over 814k followers, is doing far well in terms of gaining active followers compared to the other one which is around FOUR YEARS old!Dude, I would aver again: DON'T compare apples to oranges just because they are both fruits. 🤣Coming to online popularity, et cetera.Such a SHAME!When the world is striving for equality, here is our TM, drawing demarcations, as if the international fans belong to the land of TIMBUKTU! 🤣Wake up call!Sanaya has a global fandom, courtesy her shows IPK and RR that are religiously and repeatedly broadcast in a plethora of international countries, and I don't see a reason why that doesn't count in her ''popularity''If it doesn't to you, I guess it's time to reiterate the definition of popularity, which nowhere says, ''it doesn't include digital/online fan following.''Chalo bye!
And I think you need to get the dictionary to find the meaning of debate and grace instead of going on farrago of breathless rant
I also haven't really named anyone while commenting on insta popularity so there was no need to assume things