Originally posted by: Rein123
By that logic even we can ask where is it written that Sheshnaag is undefeated? If the story says Vasuki is defeated and Sheshnaag was the one who killed some guy called Meghnath then it’s a fact, but if it’s a version that say it was Sheshnaag that was defeated and he reincarnated as lakshman for revenge then you have an issue?
You are free to disagree but I find it weird that you have a problem when another person including me disagree with you over Vasuki being undefeated? Why can’t Vasuki be the undefeated king? Is there a problem if he remains undefeated?
Even I find it weird that u have problem with my posts , it always start arguing with me without giving d proof . I had been noticing it continuously . First u argued in ur topic regarding Garuda being protector of amrit which is not d truth iska koi frictional version nhi hai lord Vishnu is protector of amrit & later he handed to devta , amrit comes under protection of devraj indra , Garuda protected amrit only from snakes later gave back to indra & got a boon from him .which u argued a lot if u remember.
Point out where did I said sheshnaag is undefeated infact I only informed his defeat from meghnath. Kissi se defeat hona koi gunaah nhi hai but u r busy painting Vasuki like he is so powerful that no one can defeat I agree there many version but none of version will say something which never happened .
Thank god vinnas informed it was shown in DKMD lord shiv & Vishnu started a fight after Garuda & Vasuki.
Vinata mother of Garuda & aruna asked a boon from her husband sage Kashyap that her 2 sons will be more powerful than kadru 1000 naags sons .
Sheshaag dint have any encounter with meghnath in his real form coz he dint reside in paatal , ye har jagah likha hai ki he resides in vaikuntha. He left paatalok & went vaikuntha after that Vasuki started ruling .
Meghnath was born in tretayug sheshnaag left paatalok & started residing in vaikuntha in satyug itself. It was wrongly written that's why I pointed out . Really sorry to inform u Meghnath can't enter vaikuntha till lord Vishnu grant him permission. I doubt any version will say Meghnath before his birth fought with sheshnaag
Vasuki no doubt is very powerful & great king but aisa nhi ki koi nhi hara sakta nor he has any such boon or getting defeated will make him less powerful.
U keep saying Vasuki passed his throne to takshak , yes it happened 4 sure but lord shiv asked him resume his duties as naagraj so he obeyed him , it's his dedication only that he is following lord shiv orders .
Vasuki is king of all naags takshak is king of sarps .
U kept on arguing Garuda having enimity with sheshnaag , & he tolerate sheshnaag coz of lord Vishnu when I told Garuda save sheshnaag u said it was compulsion, I mean really , I again proved why Garuda can't have enimity with sheshnaag & much to ur disappointment u can't argue further coz geeta don't have frictional versions .
Next u kept on arguing unlimited hoods things yes Vasuki had unlimited hoods 4 sure but not more than sheshnaag coz sheshnaag has no end that's why he is called adi anant sheshnaag. Initial or I say very first name of sheshnaag is naagraj anant . I was expecting to hear adi anant is used for Vasuki too.
When u argue anything related mytho then definitely u have to give d reference where it is written .
Yes we can agree to disagree but I dont think u follow this .
First u see urself then point finger on others .
Edited by deepikagupta9 - 4 years ago
Anupamaa
