The butchering of Bela as a character - Page 5

Originally posted by: VARUNI2014

Nothing wrong but it shows the character as whimsical and capricious and it gives others to bash on her and even suspect that type of characters will move on from their present new love also bcos basically no reason right so what's the guarantee

Originally posted by: MallikaDua

Those are silly people who think that a person should never move on unless some negative characteristic gets revealed. People want ki ek insaan ko lekar rote rahe bas poori zindgi. Old mentality stupid people.

Originally posted by: VARUNI2014

I agree with you . She gas right to move on ,same applies to mahir too .for suppose some one kidnaps him for 6 months and every one thinks him as dead ..then bela can move on from Mahir too ...

Originally posted by: MallikaDua

Yes why not?

Originally posted by: Anisaxena089

I have disagree a bit here coz sometimes the length of time doesn't matter it is the people the relationship u share with them that does there are times when you click with a person instantly nd sometimes they grow on u nd all relationship be it love or friendship work Almost in similar patterns. The intensity of love she has for mahir could be more than that for Vikrant nd also they talk of bliss of a new found love we r usually more involved in stuff intial than we r sometime later nd Vikrant absence gave Bela a reason rely on mahir what for me went wrong was them showing Vikrant to be such goody two shoe sacrificing his love nd all that

Originally posted by: VARUNI2014

For behir shippers it's ok .but for others no proper reason shown why she chose 100 days love over 100 saal luv.so her character is weak

Originally posted by: tejaswie

ok tell me , she moved on with mahir thinking vikrant is no more . she started developing feelings for mahir n accepted him as her soulmate . now that vikrant is in picture will it be wise of her to kill her feelings for mahir and go back to vikrant and thus cheat both men cuz apparantly she cannot love vikrant again like she did in past ... i dont understand why are u guys questioning her this decision ? do you want her to play along wid two men ?

Originally posted by: Atlas_Shrugged

Bela has her faults. But then that's her character. That's what those instances you quoted prove.

1. This part I agree that her involvement in the revenge is not much. She seemed to be relying too much on Vish. She has this problem of not checking before killing/revenge/confessions.

2. Here I don't agree that she looked foolish for having humanity. There was nothing foolish about saving Anu. This track I think highlihgted the difference between Bela and Vish as naagins. While Vish was happy to standby and watch Anu die, Bela risked being exposed to save her.

3. Rejecting Vikrant, without knowing his truth, was the best character development for bela in my opinion. She is someone's wife, and has fallen heads over heels with her husband. As for not reacting with happiness on Vikrant's return, Vikrant was not able to answer one of her questions straight, and on top of it she feels guilty for killing those boys, when Vikrant did not even die, forget die, there's not even a scratch / bullet mark on him.

Character butchering of Bela happened when

-she was not angry for the molestation attempt before declaring that those boys were innocent. That's where

-She allows Yuvi/Vikrant to get all touchy touchy with her in front of Mahir and whole family. That was so out of character.