Originally posted by: -JaZ-
she was killing everyone n not just targeting maahir coz whatever they did lead to vikrant's death...like vikrant said that time if they leave ruhi then he will not harm them... if vik was not dead or if bela had seen him alive before killing them then she may not have killed them n again it was adi who did not leave ruhi...n luckily ruhi was not raped so it was only rape attempt...don't care about other countries but in india death sentence will not be given for rape attempt...so for me killing them was unfair since it was shown bela the fl killing them, by comparing her to shivanya n shivangi on how fair their revenge was written n it is only my opinion others can have their own n i'm no more interested on continuing this debate...
Modern Indian laws based on British IPC won't apply for naag they have their own which are more stringent and insistent on revenge
Did u read garuda puranas and see the punishments there ..it is Indian mythology ..there killing is the punishment who try to play with women modesty and killing is punishment
Vik gave an offer to them to leave and go and they will be spared ..But they did not leave ruhi ..and killed vik he died is not us another issue ..it's attempt to murder
So even if vik alive ...attempt to murder and circumstances keading thatvwon't go away and those 6 will be punished
Edited by VARUNI2014 - 6 years ago