Siya win but Big MISTAKE - Page 3

Originally posted by: rimitimi

So HAppy Siya is WIN...............😊. But Aamaji Haar ke vi Jeet gayi... COZ Siya ko 1st amaji ke paas jakar pranaam karna tha , amaji sas vi & bari vi........😡 But siya chuk gayi & Aamaji aage barkar apni gale ka haar pahna di & Aashirbaad vi di.............😲.. Siya RAjNITI me Aa to gayi & Mukhiya vi ban gayi------ Raghav, police,& village ki women's ke liye.............😉. Aage kya karogi coz Siya ghar ho or bahar shirf Bari- bari baat se nahi , Dil & dimaag se kaam karna parta hai .....😕. Jabki ushi samay tum chuk jati ho.....🥱. But chalo ghar wapas aane ki baat maankar thori akal dikhai but ghar me aakar vi tum aamaji ke aage pranaam nahi ki...................😡 This is siya's BIG EGO....................😳

It's not about Sia's ego; it's about self-respect. Why should Sia bow down before the woman who has constantly been responsible for making her miserable ever since she set foot in Veerpur?

Personally, I don't think being a mother-in-law automatically gives you the right to be treated with respect. It's a two way street - if Ammaji can misuse her status, then Sia should be allowed to cross the line every now and then. Just my opinion ...

Originally posted by: sarah1024

It's not about Sia's ego; it's about self-respect. Why should Sia bow down before the woman who has constantly been responsible for making her miserable ever since she set foot in Veerpur?

Personally, I don't think being a mother-in-law automatically gives you the right to be treated with respect. It's a two way street - if Ammaji can misuse her status, then Sia should be allowed to cross the line every now and then. Just my opinion ...

and moreover the whole scene looked too scepticle!i mean ammaji garlanding sia and praising her and all!sia being a straightforward girl wouldnt have understood as to why ammaji was behaving that way!she would have been too baffled for even the thought of taking ammaji'a ashirwaad to enter her head!lol! if sia were egoistic,why would she agree on returning to the havelli even when raghav was against it?!sia has never been against ammaji,she has only been against ammaji's views!its funny that people should feel sia is egoistic!

Originally posted by: tiny15

i don't know how ppl think ammaji win inspite of defeat in election & support her!!i m seeing this trend v.much present in colours shows of making -ve ckts so powerful that ppl actually liking them & +ve ckts r made so meek that ppl sumtimes even abused them prsnlly!!😲😲🤢🤢🥱 1st it happened in BV( wen earlier i used 2 watch it) where dadisa was v.popular, then UT where ppl r ga-ga over tapasya & now in NAIDL this ammaji is winning!!

wen"ll this trend of -vity end in the shows of colour!! wen they 1st launched the channel they said we brought new concepts but wheres it!!😡😡🥱

hey very well said!the thing is that the actors who get to play the negative character always have an advantage of showing off their acting skills.be it meghna malik or rashmi or menka or the actor who plays dadisa in balika vadhu.because of this,these actors are always more senior and experienced to the actors who play the positive character.because they have been in this industry for a long time,they become sophisticated and are capable of carrying themselves better and because they are senior artists and more experienced,the cameramen and the director and script writer give them all the meaty dialouges !as a result of which these people start overshadowing the people who play the positive character!

@harsha i agree they r not total -ve & in oder shows of oder channels 2 the condition is like this only but we generally talk a prsn as a gud or bad or -ve or +ve which is due 2 the dominance of the particular trait. e.g even Ravaan is considered bad & we celeberate by burning his effigy but he was known scholar of all scriptures, sciences etc. & even Lord Rama'd praised him & considered more brave than himself. and i heard on a news channel that sumwhere in middle India they don't burn his effigy & sumtimes worship him 2 just bcoz it. and his effigy is also not burned in 1 of the parts of my state i.e.Himachal & its a common thinking there that if they burn it then Lord Shiva won't like it as ravana constructed a temple in honour of him there😊😊!!

Originally posted by: tiny15

@harsha i agree they r not total -ve & in oder shows of oder channels 2 the condition is like this only but we generally talk a prsn as a gud or bad or -ve or +ve which is due 2 the dominance of the particular trait. e.g even Ravaan is considered bad & we celeberate by burning his effigy but he was known scholar of all scriptures, sciences etc. & even Lord Rama'd praised him & considered more brave than himself. and i heard on a news channel that sumwhere in middle India they don't burn his effigy & sumtimes worship him 2 just bcoz it. and his effigy is also not burned in 1 of the parts of my state i.e.Himachal & its a common thinking there that if they burn it then Lord Shiva won't like it as ravana constructed a temple in honour of him there😊😊!!

though they'd shown sum reason behind -vity but i don't think in reality 2 we"ll ever go by it as wen we saw a prsn behaving like ammaji or tapasya we don't think as sum reason behind it bcoz wat we see is prsns behaviour which may b shaped due 2 outer pressures like our grandparents who were raised as thinking gals not allowed 2b treated equally but they don't treat them like a dirt like ammaji or tapasya is doing. its only we ppl i.e wid +ve leanings who think like it but ask any -ve leaning prsn he/she won't say oh u may've gud qualities so i won't harm u.

@adinats u r rite ppl got easily influenced by -vity & then started defending their actions 2 !!! and i rem reading a saying that in life theres always 2 options 1 is rite & oder1 is easy. and i'd earlier told a saying read in sum book that we r not wat our capabilities r but its wat we chose 2 b!!👏👏so outside pressure works only wen we don't've will 2 do the rite.

we think like this because that is how v have been brought up.ammaji and tapasya think like the way they do because that is how they have been brought up!

Originally posted by: rimitimi

<font size="3"> <font color="#996600">So HAppy Siya is WIN...............😊. But Aamaji Haar ke vi Jeet gayi... COZ Siya ko 1st amaji ke paas jakar pranaam karna tha , amaji sas vi & bari vi........😡 But siya chuk gayi & Aamaji aage barkar apni gale ka haar pahna di & Aashirbaad vi di.............😲.. Siya RAjNITI me Aa to gayi & Mukhiya vi ban gayi------ Raghav, police,& village ki women's ke liye.............😉. Aage kya karogi coz Siya ghar ho or bahar shirf Bari- bari baat se nahi, Dil & dimaag se kaam karna parta hai .....😕. Jabki ushi samay tum chuk jati ho.....🥱. But chalo ghar wapas aane ki baat maankar thori akal dikhai but ghar me aakar vi tum aamaji ke aage pranaam nahi ki...................😡 This is siya's BIG EGO....................😳</font></font>

tumne yeh kya likha hai....mere kuch samaj nahi aaya....your hinglish is bad...lol 😉

[ we think like this because that is how v have been brought up.ammaji and tapasya think like the way they do because that is how they have been brought up!

please read my previous posts😊.i have answered each of your question to the best of my ability😊 ....i seriously am clueless as to why ammaji is brought up like that😊maybe it will be revealed in future episodes😊

Originally posted by: harshajkarthik

please read my previous posts😊.i have answered each of your question to the best of my ability😊 ....i seriously am clueless as to why ammaji is brought up like that😊maybe it will be revealed in future episodes😊

what you say is very true.but,my deep conviction is that people are not born bad,circumstances make them bad.ofcourse,this is no excuse for being bad,if someone commits a crime,they have to be punished.