Unrequited love: folly or nobility? - Page 2

Created

Last reply

Replies

13

Views

1.6k

Users

3

Likes

3

Frequent Posters

987873 thumbnail
Posted: 11 years ago
#11
They've certainly taken care of him, no one disputes this fact. But as I said when it came to their test they and their trust and love for the boy fell short. When your life's jolly good, all the promises and love is showered upon the people who have done good to you. (I remember The Hobbit book where Bilbo does so much for his companions and they love him very much and ask him to order anything as their generations will serve him but his one decision of avoiditing the conflict costs him his friendship with them. I was disappointed at their remarks but that may be the immaturity and lack of understanding of the text; I see same thing happening here too i.e. Ranveer did everything for them and they showered their love on him but when it came to them passing their tests they failed like Bilbo's friends. Bilbo's friends were forgiven because they asked for it while the Parekh's aren't going to do the same) when it will come to the trust, they will not trust him, as far as I can see. He'll be humiliated for a crime he never committed. It's not about how much they took care of him, but if they'll really trust him when he needs their support. For the love thing, that is what I want to know. It is becaue of the harmones and genes, and other biological, psychological stuff working in our body. But why can't someone start his or her own life without any association of their rejectors? Do you think Ranveer would have married someone else if Ishaani got married to Chirag and Chirag remained a positive person?
NBT-BV thumbnail
12th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail
Posted: 11 years ago
#12

Originally posted by: Elvish_Hobbit

Parekh's aren't going to do the same) when it will come to the trust, they will not trust him, as far as I can see. He'll be humiliated for a crime he never committed. It's not about how much they took care of him, but if they'll really trust him when he needs their support. For the love thing, that is what I want to know. It is becaue of the harmones and genes, and other biological, psychological stuff working in our body. But why can't someone start his or her own life without any association of their rejectors? Do you think Ranveer would have married someone else if Ishaani got married to Chirag and Chirag remained a positive person?

let me get from the beginning.
When Ranveer came as child to PF it was an act of charity / compassion which any person can feel for a servants son who has worked for some time In the family especially when PF is a rich family. Slowly they started loving him bcoz of his association with the family, his work and loyalty to the family. This love is by choice and not by chance (as the blood relation).
When the requirement of trust comes they fail to support and I don't see any thing wrong in it. Blood is thicker than water.
Now coming to ranveer ishani - the romantic love is hormones and chemicals. They get activated for the next step of genetic progression (extension of life felt by every living being) thru pro creation.
987873 thumbnail
Posted: 11 years ago
#13
Now, I agree with the part that their love for him wasn't by chance but choice. Absolutely true. Imagine yourself claiming for someone that you love that person very much. And there comes a time when you have to choose between your friend who you have known for years and other one who you have known only for 2 months. If you choose the later one for whatever reason, don't you think, you failed the test of your friendship? What made you go for the person who has just entered your life and not the one who has been with you, has been loyal to you for almost all his or her life? That's for the Chirag case. Now coming to Disha. For a well organized mind, only justice shall matter. Ishaani is not Harshad's blood but he still considers her his daughter and will never doubt her love or loyalty. Similarly, neither is Ranveer his blood but has been with them as long as it can be remembered. Harshad said he trusts Ranveer as much he trusts Ishaani, I don't get how is he going to contradict himself? Is it really appropriate to sacrifice such devoted person for the sake of immature blood relation?
NBT-BV thumbnail
12th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail
Posted: 11 years ago
#14

Originally posted by: Elvish_Hobbit

Now, I agree with the part that their love for him wasn't by chance but choice. Absolutely true. Imagine yourself claiming for someone that you love that person very much. And there comes a time when you have to choose between your friend who you have known for years and other one who you have known only for 2 months. If you choose the later one for whatever reason, don't you think, you failed the test of your friendship? What made you go for the person who has just entered your life and not the one who has been with you, has been loyal to you for almost all his or her life? That's for the Chirag case. Now coming to Disha. For a well organized mind, only justice shall matter. Ishaani is not Harshad's blood but he still considers her his daughter and will never doubt her love or loyalty. Similarly, neither is Ranveer his blood but has been with them as long as it can be remembered. Harshad said he trusts Ranveer as much he trusts Ishaani, I don't get how is he going to contradict himself? Is it really appropriate to sacrifice such devoted person for the sake of immature blood relation?

This is exactly I have been saying on the IF. To sacrifice your loved ones (amba ) just for the love of Ishani is not correct but this is the problem bcoz of the emotion of love itself. When you love a friend, bro, sis , parents its not bcoz of hormones and chemicals. This has more to do with the bonding you feel which is genetic (same genes) or similarity in the genetic characteristics (friends). When you meet your best friend you enjoy the closeness but not the physical touch. You never keep thinking about your friend all the time. exceptions are their if you feel anxiety for your friend in specific circumstances.
The communication with your friendly love is through vibes. (no chemical and wifi in nature harshad- ishani). On the other hand a romantic love is chemical and craves for contact. This particular feeling is stronger bcoz it is the natural survival instinct of a living being - this includes continuity of life (to have off spring so that your genes are carried forward). No instinct can surpass the survival instinct. This is the reason people leave even their parents / friends when in love/ for marriage.

Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".