Amen, to that . I concur with your emotions totally.Only, the fire needed to be tempered most times. They sacrificed far too much for family's sake.
Bigg Boss 19: daily Discussion Thread- 1st Sept 2025.
Mannat Har Khushi Paane Ki: Episode Discussion Thread - 26
Yeh Rishta Kya Kehlata Hai - 01 Sep 2025 EDT
Yeh Rishta Kya Kehlata Hai Sept 2, 2025 Episode Discussion Thread
UMAR KHAYID 1.9
ABHEERA IN JAIL 2.9
Bacha chor is such an incompetent lawyer🤦♀️
What’s the upcoming track??
Mrunal Thakur Called Mean Girl
In this gen Cliff wali legacy maut will not happen
I wanted Abheera’s fate for Akshara
Happy Birthday wat_up 🎂
Janhvi Kapoor In Talks For Chaalbaaz Remake
Jee Le Zaraa Is Happening
Celebs pictures during Ganesh Festival
Amen, to that . I concur with your emotions totally.Only, the fire needed to be tempered most times. They sacrificed far too much for family's sake.
Originally posted by: ltelidevaralak
I would definitely continue the remaining
Fairydust! Did you go through the continued update that I posted yesterday?I gave citations till the end of vanaparva.
Much obliged, Fairydust. It was a God-given privilege to weave gossamer around this precious pair.
Originally posted by: 1Rockstar1
Because they are obsessed about a 5,000 old mythology so called love story.. Best love story ever.. 😛
Even in a war ridden epic like Mbh Vyasa found enough reason to portray panchali's preference.To accept it or not accept it depends upon the mindset and perception.The verses that are cited are present in almost all versions.That much hints are given in vanaparva itself that substantiates the final statement. Pakshapato mahanasya...As per Draupadi's dependence on bheema yes Vyasa depicted the mutual trust and understanding. If not he would have narrated Draupadi's displeasure on his other marriages.Mahabharat is not a love story. It is not an ArDi story or even a Pandav-Panchali story. That being said - It's quite definitely not an ArSu story which was a political alliance brought about by Krishna using Arjun's attraction to Subhadra. Subhi was indifferent at best. Initial attraction is quite different from love and that goes for Arjun as well as the ladies. Arjun was quite clearly said to be attracted to both women at first sight but only Panchali was called his beloved.
Mahabharat is a story of individuals sacrificing for the betterment of the world around them. Panchali had quite a busy life and she quite clearly tells Satyabhama that she bears the burden of the Empire while the Pandavas 'pursue their virtue'. If she ran an Empire that extended from the Vindhyas to the Himalayas, from the Arabian sea to Pragjyotisha, then she had time freezing capabilities like ⭐️Krishna to stew about who else Arjun was 'pursuing his virtue' with.Also if Panchali actually said all those words about Arjun, in a book supposed to have increased from 8K to 24K verses that it was originally (according to Indologists) to the 100 K verses now, then she DID a lot of things which showed her reliance on Bheem. It's up to the reader I guess to decide which speaks louder for them, actions or words.But, IMHO, when we focus on who loved whom, the meaning of the epic is lost.
check the posts dear, I gave all the Sanskrit poems connected with the incidents.Today's update from virata Parva and udyoga Parva is on the way.Hey, waiting for today's update. 😊 Its such a pleasure reading your posts. Please do give Sanskrit verses alongside too.