Originally posted by: tina59
I am not happy with some of the things shown esp reg Krishna's manipulation and citing whatever drona, bheeshma and Karna have done as wrong.
for eg Lord Krishna says whatever drona did all his life was wrong when otherwise he was extremely supportive of the same when pandavas and drona were in the same side.
Excatly.. had Krishna pointed out about Ekalavya incident to Drona, things would have made more sensible..but his saying of Drona attacking Drupad is wrong, I don't agree as it was Drupad who insulted his best friend, forget not keeping his promise!!!
whenever Drona, Bheeshma and Karna were ready to fight square and fait in a battlefield, Krishna comes in between freezes everything and then somehow manipulates them into thinking that all they done in their entire life was wrong and only by dying they become mukth is just not acceptable to me.
trueee!!! its almost like hypnotizing them .. he will say something and at the end of it all will agree and readily wait for death...
in the case of karna, wheres the famous scene of Karna's greatness when Arjun's arrows turn into garlands where Krishna disguises into a saint and asks Karna to daan all his dharma's done so far, which he readily gives allowing Arjuna to finally kill him.
This was such a significant part showing Karna's goodness but they never showed that.
the whole of Epi i felt was.. the makers desperately wanted to give some "Gyaan" to Karna and had no idea of what to give and in vain cooked up the entire stupidity!!! š„±
I also refuse to accept the entire fault of draupadi's humiliation was duryodhana's fault, it was equally the pandavas who could have just walked away when they were losing instead they not only went ahead and played but also put their wife for gamble.
Totally agree! After all, it was the Pandavas who paved way for Duryodhan to do this! And had any of the Pandavas tried stopping their bro and gone against him and attacked the Kauravas instead of taking Vows to kill them later..Pandavas would have made sense!!!
it also looks like the pandavas entered the war only to take revenge for draupadi and not for righteousness .
agree!!! Vastraharan was only one among the many reason which lead to the war!!
for me god aside, Krishna and Shakuni were two sides of a coin. Both manipulated everyone around them to get what they want and never cared for right or wrong in the process.
The kauravas were not good people yes I agree but I place Pandavas in the same category as well, they too did a lot which i dont find fair. thats why I feel that placing them on a higher pedestal than the Kauravas was unacceptable to me. For me, both were the same.
Pandavas were no saints like they are been portrayed!! they too had flaws.. forget everything... their one mistake in the vastra haran part was gravest of all mistakes.. graver than that of any kaurava!!!