Nothing wrong in deeming the Pandavas guilty...except that Krishna himself deems them guilty, but he is on their side...Does it mean Krishna himself is on the side which committed adharma?
🏏 Asia Cup 2025: Sri Lanka vs Bangladesh, Super Four, Match 1 Dubai🏏
Bigg Boss 19 - Daily Discussion Topic - 21st Sep 2025 - WKV
🏏India vs Pakistan, Asia Cup-Super Four, Match 14 (A1 v A2) Dubai🏏
HONEYMOON🏩 20th and 21.9
Downfall is Real! No one even cares for SPA pics this year
Star Parivaar Ki Favourite Saas
Yeh Rishta Kya Kehlata Hai Sept 21, 2025 Episode Discussion Thread
Baseer’s Accent
Akshay Kumar Is Back To Giving Hits
H-1B Visa Crisis: Families Forced to Return, Futures at Stake
👻😈😈😈Mask Of Zorro😈😈😈👻
Saiyaaara spoof
Happy Birthday Kareena Kapoor 💐🎊
Jobless Poddars
Let's Discuss Abhir
Chunkey Panday happiest for Ahaan’s success (Saiyaara)
24 years of Ajnabee
Tabu likes a reel shading Deepika on Instagram
Nothing wrong in deeming the Pandavas guilty...except that Krishna himself deems them guilty, but he is on their side...Does it mean Krishna himself is on the side which committed adharma?
I am not saying anything which states Arjuna is wrong ...Definitely in the entire episode only his dialogues were minutely resembling Arjuna Vishaada hoga...I seriously didnot understand why starKrishna was confusing him??? Wasnt that demoralising him even more.Why cant they just keep it simple as in the epic on Arjuna's request placed Arjunas chariot amidst the two armies and Why is Sanjaya not describing all this ??? as it is Duryodhana was supposed to march ahead and give a breifing regarding armies which is not shown .There is no mention of Yuyutsu ,Satyaki ...Kritiverma and Susharma atleast ...If not all of them ...Originally posted by: Arijit007
ok, frappie, i think in the epic, krishna cause arjuna's emotional breakdown by showing the kaurava maharathis and maharathis of pandava side. here the starbhaarat cv's used a direct aproch and introduced aditional drama by showing flashback of baarnavart and dyut sabha, and about arjun geting maliened, his emotional breakdown did not brought shame and here too, he is clean.
Originally posted by: Nandiniraizaada
There guilt was that they blindly followed their brother. And their brothers guilt was that he stuck to what he perceived as Dharma
But they didn't poison a little boy or burn a house down with live people in it or used underhanded ways to win a dice game or insulted a woman publicly. Pandavas were human they couldn't have Dharma to the last hilt but there Sins was much less in comparisonAnd I guess we can even say what Pandavas did were mistakes not adharma
Well I think Dury was bent upon proving that they were way stronger than Paandavaas ...but I guess he did mention the strength of Paandava army aswell .In my Point of veiw it was important as it proves that he was overconfident and also " vinash kaale veepreet buddhi " concept...Hey Krishna please save us from star CVs...Originally posted by: Arijit007
by not showing that, the cv's did a great job, i think at that time when duri was telling bhishma about the names and strength of kurupaksh, he was scared, realy hate the fact that before the words of krishna he was mentioned, because dhrit had to mentioned his sonsad "mamaka".
Today's episode was decent...