Mahabharat Episode Discussion Thread # 10/ DT's Nt pg 121

First Previous

Page

118

Next Last

Frequent Posters

Ashwini_D

@Ashwini_D

Navigator

Posted: 11 years ago

#771

Originally posted by: Sabhayata

Just wait and watch what will happen when pandavs get to know the truth

We'll have five, nay six consecutive shots of tears rolling down 6 cheeks, coupled with a scream or two.

Edited by Ashwini_D - 11 years ago

Quote

Sabhayata

@Sabhayata

Sparkler

+ 4

Posted: 11 years ago

#772

Originally posted by: ...Diala...

How can Pandavas deny anything.. I was talking about Kunti ma.. He should have been considered a Pandava but if not also, that would have stopped him from joining Duryodhan.. something that gained him infamy and death..

he was considered son of pandu by krishna ji atleast that is what krishna ji tells him

Quote

Looks like you are new here. Register for free, learn and contribute.

Diala D

@...Diala...

Sparkler

+ 2

Posted: 11 years ago

#773

Sheena (Dr Model).. if that is your name.. It is news to me that you are open to quoting and direct replies.. I remember the very first convo we had you had asked me not to quote you.. possible dat you forgot..

Participating in swayamvar does not guarantee that all those woman would be their eternal dream girls.. And also was her portrait shared with everyone to say that the participation itself was for how beautiful she was?

Karna was offended by the words "I wont take a Suta for my Lord' Not by the words 'Draupadi does not like you'.. The later would prove you right.. btw am not even sure how long Karna carried that scar..

If her beauty can be taken a base for Karna's desire, Krishna's offer can be a base for POI.. What is wrong there is my question.. ok was my question..

Quote

charminggenie

@charminggenie

Stunner

+ 2

Posted: 11 years ago

#774

Originally posted by: ...Diala...

How can Pandavas deny anything.. I was talking about Kunti ma.. He should have been considered a Pandava but if not also, that would have stopped him from joining Duryodhan.. something that gained him infamy and death..

He couldn't be considered Pandu son ever, he was not acknowledged as son by Pandu nor was he associated with him. He was born to an unwed Kunti - who saved him the faith and humiliation that he could have faced , she in hindsight saved him , are we not aware of the circumstances then.

For rest, I would say perceptive , he made the issue of his parentage cloud his Karma and Dharma, underselling his talent and skills.

Quote

Diala D

@...Diala...

Sparkler

+ 2

Posted: 11 years ago

#775

Originally posted by: DrModel
@ Diala, was I speaking to you yesterday??i don't think so.

please see note above. its quite obvious whom you are referring to.

No yesterday but months back.. yes I know I made it obvious..

Quote

Diala D

@...Diala...

Sparkler

+ 2

Posted: 11 years ago

#776

Originally posted by: charminggenie

He couldn't be considered Pandu son ever, he was not acknowledged as son by Pandu nor was he associated with him. He was born to an unwed Kunti - who saved him the faith and humiliation that he could have faced , she in hindsight saved him , are we not aware of the circumstances then.

For rest, I would say perceptive , he made the issue of his parentage cloud his Karma and Dharma, underselling his talent and skills.

he was a Pandava.. Maiden born sons are considered sons of the woman's wedded husband.. Pandu, Krishna and Kunti all confirm this.. only difference Pandu dint know Kunti had one..

Quote

Diala D

@...Diala...

Sparkler

+ 2

Posted: 11 years ago

#777

Originally posted by: Sabhayata

Just wait and watch what will happen when pandavs get to know the truth

🤣🤣🤣

Yesterday atleast was just 2 faces.. this one will be too much of zoom zooms 😆

Quote

Sabhayata

@Sabhayata

Sparkler

+ 4

Posted: 11 years ago

#778

Originally posted by: charminggenie

He couldn't be considered Pandu son ever, he was not acknowledged as son by Pandu nor was he associated with him. He was born to an unwed Kunti - who saved him the faith and humiliation that he could have faced , she in hindsight saved him , are we not aware of the circumstances then.

For rest, I would say perceptive , he made the issue of his parentage cloud his Karma and Dharma, underselling his talent and skills.

as per the norms of that time any son born from the wife was husbands son so yes he was considered a pandav that is what krishna ji tells him and that is how he offers him the throne as well
"Vasudeva said, 'O son of Radha, thou hast worshipped many Brahmanas fully conversant with the Vedas. With concentrated attention and mind free from envy thou hast also (on many an occasion) enquired of them after truth. Thou knowest, therefore, O Karna, what the eternal saying of the Vedas are. Thou art also well-versed in all the subtle conclusions of the scriptures. It is said by those conversant with the scriptures that the two kinds of sons called Kanina and Sahoda that are born of a maiden, have him for their father who weddeth the maid. Thou, O Karna, hast been born in this way. Thou art, therefore, morally the son of Pandu