Originally posted by: smrth
" Karna wrathfully and insolently interrupted his words, and looking at Duryodhana said, 'There is no creature in the world, O Brahmana, who is not informed of all these facts. What is the good of repeating them again and again? On behalf of Duryodhana, Sakuni formerly won in game of dice. Yudhishthira, the son of Pandu went to the woods according to a stipulation. He is now paying no regard to that stipulation, but confident of aid from the Matsyas and Panchalas, he wisheth to get back his ancestral throne. O learned man, Duryodhana would not yield even a single foot of land..."
"And wending away from the court, the Kuru prince began to consult. And this was the resolution which Duryodhana and Karna and Suvala's son Sakuni, with Dussasana as their fourth, arrived at, 'This Janardana, quick in action, seeketh, with the king Dhritarashtra and Santanu's son, to seize us first. We, however, shall forcibly seize this tiger among men, Hrishikesa.."
To put the chaff from this Bhil Bharat/Karna Bharat in to its proper place- Barnyard of worst distortions. And for those few who'd care to know how actually it was in real MB.🤢
(Regarding Flips of today's episode where Great Greek supported ' the 'proposal of five village, as well 'opposed' the arrest)
Karna was involved in this one too?
Seriously?
I understand he was indebted to Duryodhan, but y was he so aggressive with the Pandavas?
All bcoz of what Arjun and Bhima had said to him during that competition?
I understand that he was unhappy that Arjun was always given more acknowledgement as a warrior, and he never got that bcoz of his caste.
And then that rejection at Draupadi's Swamvar made things worse.
But bcoz of that, he started plotting to kill the Pandavas along with their old mother at Lakshagriha, then instigating Draupadi's vastraharan, vowing to kill the Pandavas in the woods due to Duryodhan's insecurity, supporting Duryodhan in not returning kingdom...
I know that the Pandavas were no saints, but still.
I really don't understand what was the reason behind this intense hatred of Karna for the Pandavas.
Many people say that Karna did all this bcoz of his "friendship" with Duryodhan.
It is true that Karna died fighting for Duryodhan, in the war, without asking for any wealth, throne, etc in return. He did not have greed for any throne or wealth, which is y I respect him.
But then as a true "friend", he should have corrected Duryodhan, instead of supporting his mistakes. Isn't that what true friends do?
People say that Karna was righteous. Then y did he not realize that disrobing a woman publicly, in return for rejection in marriage or for any other reason is wrong? If he is so much blinded by friendship and revenge, then how come he is "righteous"?
He was a noble man, but these actions of his really confuse me, as to what kind of a person Karna really was.
